On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:20:08PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:07:48PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > ssmtp has been quiet project for quite a while, where as msmtp is
> > maintained one.
> >
> > sure, ssmtp might be just mature, but msmtp is equally small and h
# Christian Birchinger (11 Sep 2010)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't work
# with recent Audacious and the included ghosd
# plugin is a perfect replacment.
media-plugins/audacious-xosd
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:07:10PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Christian Birchinger wrote:
>> Hello
>> Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates?
>> Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting
>> for it's now mandatory debugger.
Hello
Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates?
Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting
for it's now mandatory debugger.
I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really want to install
stuff like Orbit and GConf etc.
My patch to have GConf optional was rejected by
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of
> that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed
> t
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:23:49PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> If you read what you are quoting:
>
> >> Mozilla will drop support for that series from 24 April 2007 onwards.
That's still almost a month + the time no security issues
appear. This would be still better.
Christian
--
gentoo-dev@ge
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 05:03:37PM +0100, Raúl Porcel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The mozilla team has decided that the
>www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
>from now (18 Mar 2007), that is 1 April 2007. And will be removed after
>two weeks from that date, which will be 15 Apr
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:24:15PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:43 -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 21:31 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > Andrej Kacian wrote:
> > > > It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1. Themes
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:13:41AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Personally, I'd say 686 is the lowest reasonable to support at this point.
> Below that, try an appropriate binary distribution and save the days/weeks
> of compiling. Of course, Gentoo is highly customizable, and folks could
> try it on 38
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote:
> Unfortunatelly this is something different. xmm-pipe lets you control
> running xmms from commandline (thus binding these commands to
> keys). It allows control volume, skipping in current track (fast
> forward), do some playlist a
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>
> "svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application";
> "emerge application"
>
As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their
support files), i think it's really helpfull.
It's exactly the same
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote:
> > Then you remove the profile just like you would remove any piece
> > of software where the license is unacceptable.
>
> Please look a
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> That's not the point as i wasn't talking about single developers but
> Gentoo as an organisation. Paludis is not in any way under Gentoo's
> control. If the paludi
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:54:36PM +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote:
> > Not realistic. It means that any new package manager can't do anything
> > new. I'd also like to point out that you can't upgrade to a new Portage
> > version, install some things, downgrade to an older Portage version and
> >
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:42:53AM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> OK, since several people have asked what is going to be in this profile
> if it gets added, i had in mind something like the following (all
> filenames relative to gentoo-x86/profiles/):
>
> paludis/deprecated:
> # DO NOT USE THIS
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:54:51PM +0100, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:51:25 +
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The attached GLEP is a draft proposal for the emerge --news thing that's
> > been under discussion. There are still some TODO items. These are calls
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:18:07PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> As an aside, my preference would be to install them by default, but
> allow a nologrotate equivalent to "nodoc", "noinfo", or "noman". That
> would require hacking portage, though, which seems silly for something
> so trivial. Does
17 matches
Mail list logo
