think of another way to solve it.
Ricardo Loureiro
- --
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6B7C0EC0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDvWNBJePPaWt8DsARAuxdAJ0U9kw5qSbjuoR53T26JIinAweaowCghdnU
otQzvVuLPrc/eMoClHr+Zm0=
=zJ0+
-END PGP
/daapd:mpeg4 - Enable AAC metadata support
If I encounter such situations should I create a bug or report them
here?
Ricardo Loureiro
- --
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6B7C0EC0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux
of the arch itself,
nothing very useful to me. Also the latest news go back almost 2
years. Is there a place with more information on what portage-ng
should be?
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6B7C0EC0
pgpV7ARwSYQ0z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
using as much as possible the actual python
libs created for portage.
When I start the project itself (September 1st) I'm gonna start to
write and organize all the ideas, but you all have been a great help
so far.
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6B7C0EC0
for this
discussion.
Did already, thanks for your help already.
Ricardo Loureiro
--
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6B7C0EC0
pgpdiIpQMZHcF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
time to the forums?
That's just my 2 cents as a local moderator.
Ricardo Loureiro
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:09:41 +0200
Haas Wernfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With reference to the recent thread about this GLEP's draft [1]
we're resurrecting the discussion and would like keep you updated
Hi again,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:47:42 +0100
twofourtysix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/06/05, Ricardo Loureiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I truly doubt that any moderator would refuse to be
considered a Gentoo staff or anything gentoo related, otherwise
why choose to give their free
of valid technical support from the gentoo staff
moderators.
Ricardo Loureiro
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:45:40 +0100
Tom Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After the discussion today about the forums GLEP [1], we've made
some changes:
All the current global moderators and admins who aren't