Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-07 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/07/2015 05:56 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/07/2015 07:28 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 09/06/2015 02:00 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: >>> Hi, >> >>> On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-07 Thread Jauhien Piatlicki
Hi, On 09/07/2015 07:28 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 09/06/2015 02:00 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: >> Hi, > >> On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > I think cargo should probably go in dev-util with other rust libraries an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-06 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/06/2015 02:00 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > >>> I think cargo should probably go in dev-util with other rust >>> libraries and programs

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-06 Thread Jauhien Piatlicki
Hi, On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> I think cargo should probably go in dev-util with other rust >> libraries and programs going into dev-rust as needed, but that's >> just me :D > > Agreed. dev-util until it grows in size (isn't t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-05 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 09/05/2015 02:21 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have plans to split ?/cargo-bin [1] package from the >> dev-lang/rust-bin one. We have already dev-rust/cargo package in >> the rust overl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-05 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/05/2015 02:21 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: > Hi, > > I have plans to split ?/cargo-bin [1] package from the dev-lang/rust-bin > one. We have already dev-rust/cargo package in the rust overlay[2]. > > It would be logical to have dev-rust/cargo-bin package then. But there > is a problem: it w

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category

2015-09-05 Thread Jauhien Piatlicki
Hi, I have plans to split ?/cargo-bin [1] package from the dev-lang/rust-bin one. We have already dev-rust/cargo package in the rust overlay[2]. It would be logical to have dev-rust/cargo-bin package then. But there is a problem: it will be the only package in this category in the tree and it is