On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> >
> > "svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application";
> > "emerge application"
> >
>
> As long as it's made for pulling single ebu
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>
> "svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application";
> "emerge application"
>
As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their
support files), i think it's really helpfull.
It's exactly the same
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 14:04 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > You should at least make it visible in bold letters on the overlay.g.o
> > front page, what the conditions of each overlay are and which [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]
> > address bugs have to be assigned to.
>
>
> Pl
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
> And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or
> maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not
> supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that
> they can cause any damage to applicat
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
> And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or
> maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not
> supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that
> they can cause any damage to applicat
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
> And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or
> maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not
> supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that
> they can cause any damage to applicat
On Friday 09 June 2006 14:04, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Please, do not assume our users being stupid. They know that they are using
> an ebuild from the sunrise overlay with zero support. They deliberately
> typed
You have said stupid, not me. Some won't care enough, I'm quite sure about
that. We
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> You should at least make it visible in bold letters on the overlay.g.o
> front page, what the conditions of each overlay are and which [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> address bugs have to be assigned to.
Please, do not assume our users being stupid. They know that they are using
a
