On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application;
emerge application
As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their
support files), i think it's really helpfull.
It's exactly the same as
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application;
emerge application
As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
You should at least make it visible in bold letters on the overlay.g.o
front page, what the conditions of each overlay are and which [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
address bugs have to be assigned to.
Please, do not assume our users being stupid. They know that they are using
an
On Friday 09 June 2006 14:04, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Please, do not assume our users being stupid. They know that they are using
an ebuild from the sunrise overlay with zero support. They deliberately
typed
You have said stupid, not me. Some won't care enough, I'm quite sure about
that. We
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or
maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not
supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that
they can cause any damage to
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or
maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not
supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that
they can cause any damage to
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or
maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not
supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that
they can cause any damage to
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 14:04 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
You should at least make it visible in bold letters on the overlay.g.o
front page, what the conditions of each overlay are and which [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
address bugs have to be assigned to.
Please, do