Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-11 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application; emerge application As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their support files), i think it's really helpfull. It's exactly the same as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application; emerge application As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and

[gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Carsten Lohrke wrote: You should at least make it visible in bold letters on the overlay.g.o front page, what the conditions of each overlay are and which [EMAIL PROTECTED] address bugs have to be assigned to. Please, do not assume our users being stupid. They know that they are using an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Friday 09 June 2006 14:04, Stefan Schweizer wrote: Please, do not assume our users being stupid. They know that they are using an ebuild from the sunrise overlay with zero support. They deliberately typed You have said stupid, not me. Some won't care enough, I'm quite sure about that. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Danny van Dyk
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer: And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that they can cause any damage to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Danny van Dyk
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer: And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that they can cause any damage to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Danny van Dyk
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 14:04 schrieb Stefan Schweizer: And also there are only applications from maintainer-wanted or maintainer-needed allowed in the overlay. Because packages are not supposed to overwrite files from other ebuilds it is unlikely that they can cause any damage to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 14:04 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: Carsten Lohrke wrote: You should at least make it visible in bold letters on the overlay.g.o front page, what the conditions of each overlay are and which [EMAIL PROTECTED] address bugs have to be assigned to. Please, do