On 17/09/2013 15:58, Duncan wrote:
Note that it wasn't JUST punctuation/capitalization that changed in the
given example, but the version number, 1.2.3 => 1.7.3, as well. Is that
still a trivial change?
Altho I'm not sure whether kensington changed the version number in his
example deliberately
Jeroen Roovers posted on Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:03:28 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:50:06 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Michael Palimaka
>> wrote:
>> > At what point do we draw the line? Today my mailbox is full of email
>> > with changes like
Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 15:47:56 schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Palimaka
wrote:
> > That is a useful tool, but many people get a lot of their bugmail through
> > an alias.
>
> There's a trick where you can route all email from Bugzilla to the
> alias t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/09/13 01:14 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 15:47:56 schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman:
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Palimaka
>>
> wrote:
>>> That is a useful tool, but many people get a lot of their
>>> bug
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:33:21 +0200
Alex Legler wrote:
> On 16.09.2013 15:19, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Additionally, can anybody who knows more about bugzilla comment on
> > how easy it would be to have some way to mark modifications as
> > trivial, and take this into account in the bugspam? Eithe
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:19:47 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Michael Palimaka
> wrote:
> > At what point do we draw the line? Today my mailbox is full of
> > email with changes like "app-foo/bar-1.2.3: version bump" ->
> > "app-foo/bar-1.7.3 - Version bump.", changin
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:50:06 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Michael Palimaka
> wrote:
> > At what point do we draw the line? Today my mailbox is full of
> > email with changes like "app-foo/bar-1.2.3: version bump" ->
> > "app-foo/bar-1.7.3 - Version bump.", chan
On 16.09.2013 15:47, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Palimaka
> wrote:
>> That is a useful tool, but many people get a lot of their bugmail through an
>> alias.
>
> There's a trick where you can route all email from Bugzilla to the
> alias to /dev/null and "watc
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:19:47 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> Jer - can you comment on how these changes are getting made? Is this
> some kind of script, or are you manually making these changes?
It's a thing called "editing" and it is still usually done by humans
(with a broad exception for modern
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> At what point do we draw the line? Today my mailbox is full of email with
> changes like "app-foo/bar-1.2.3: version bump" -> "app-foo/bar-1.7.3 -
> Version bump.", changing keywords on years-old bugs etc.
So who's doing that? IMO that's
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> That is a useful tool, but many people get a lot of their bugmail through an
> alias.
There's a trick where you can route all email from Bugzilla to the
alias to /dev/null and "watch" the alias on Bugzilla, thereby applying
your own email
On 16/09/2013 23:33, Alex Legler wrote:
On 16.09.2013 15:19, Rich Freeman wrote:
Additionally, can anybody who knows more about bugzilla comment on how
easy it would be to have some way to mark modifications as trivial,
and take this into account in the bugspam? Either make it
configurable as t
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:41:12 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Please stop pointless bugspam.
Nice one. I'm all for it. I'm not sure how it applies to me, though.
You could prevent getting mail like that 1) by sending comments like the
above to /dev/null or 2) by writing proper bug summaries
On 16.09.2013 15:19, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Additionally, can anybody who knows more about bugzilla comment on how
> easy it would be to have some way to mark modifications as trivial,
> and take this into account in the bugspam? Either make it
> configurable as to whether users get trivial bugspam
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> At what point do we draw the line? Today my mailbox is full of email with
> changes like "app-foo/bar-1.2.3: version bump" -> "app-foo/bar-1.7.3 -
> Version bump.", changing keywords on years-old bugs etc.
Jer - can you comment on how the
On 16/09/2013 23:01, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 16 September 2013 13:41, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Please stop pointless bugspam.
Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 14:20:51 schrieben Sie:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
whose email is mentioned below. To com
On 16 September 2013 13:41, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Please stop pointless bugspam.
>
> Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 14:20:51 schrieben Sie:
>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
>> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
>>
>>
Please stop pointless bugspam.
Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 14:20:51 schrieben Sie:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483274
>
> Jeroen Roo
18 matches
Mail list logo
