Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/13/2016 10:47 AM, Christopher Head wrote: > On December 9, 2016 10:12:54 PM PST, "A. Wilcox" > wrote: >> I think James has perhaps spoken ambiguously, or at least I hope that >> you have misunderstood his proposal. (If you haven't, then he's >> misunderstood

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On December 9, 2016 10:12:54 PM PST, "A. Wilcox" wrote: >I think James has perhaps spoken ambiguously, or at least I hope that >you have misunderstood his proposal. (If you haven't, then he's >misunderstood mine.) > >The point of making it easier to fork is not only for

[gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto posted on Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:36:20 + as excerpted: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > > >> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules and >> I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. > > I've got confirmation that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/10/2016 01:12 AM, A. Wilcox wrote: > > So for one example, at Adélie we are focusing hard on the musl libc. > At some point in the future, when we have things looking good, we can > contribute that back to the official Gentoo musl overlay. Ideally, > that would be the main Gentoo package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/11/2016 10:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> >> >> >>> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules >>> and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/09/2016 09:46 PM, Christopher Head wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:15:06 -0500 > james wrote: > >> Being able to use stage-4 or stage-5 (G. forums) installs to rapidly >> provision a collection of bare-metal systems [BGO-593218] into a wide >> variety of hardened

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > > >> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules >> and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. > > I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/12/16 23:46, Christopher Head wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:15:06 -0500 james > wrote: > >> Gentoo-proper is has too much political baggage to encourage >> folks to innovate, imho. So, I really hope the gentoo dev >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:15:06 -0500 james wrote: > Being able to use stage-4 or stage-5 (G. forums) installs to rapidly > provision a collection of bare-metal systems [BGO-593218] into a wide > variety of hardened clusters is my passion. Unikernels as stage 4 > packages can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/07/2016 02:44 AM, Duncan wrote: james posted on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:10:16 -0500 as excerpted: Really, for someone like me, it is just best to avoid irc. FWIW, some 12 years ago now, in 2004, I started using gentoo, with the intent of contributing and potentially eventually becoming a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so irc is not mandatory. I hope this clears any misunderstandings and puts an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Duncan wrote: james posted on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:10:16 -0500 as excerpted: Really, for someone like me, it is just best to avoid irc. FWIW, some 12 years ago now, in 2004, I started using gentoo, with the intent of contributing and potentially eventually becoming a dev.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

james posted on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:10:16 -0500 as excerpted: > Really, for someone like me, it is just best to avoid irc. FWIW, some 12 years ago now, in 2004, I started using gentoo, with the intent of contributing and potentially eventually becoming a dev. Somewhere along the line but