On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 02:56:17 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the
masked package, but once
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de:
On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not
revbump the masked package, but once it was
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:36:15 +
Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the
masked
package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at that point.
Gotcha.
Is
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the masked
package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at that point.
Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to
toolchain packages which are not
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the
masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at
that point.
Is there somewhere which tells
On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the
masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at
that
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:47:57AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
Why not?
Yeah why not? do you inform users of this?
Users unmasking toolchain packages
В Вск, 21/11/2010 в 01:47 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
Why not?
Yeah why not? do you inform users of this?
Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:47:57 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
Why not?
Yeah why not? do you inform users of this?
Users unmasking
On 11/21/10 08:47, Ryan Hill wrote:
toolchain revbumps are expensive
How expansive? More than a rebuild of GCC itself?
Best,
Sebastian
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:54:19 +0200
Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:47:57AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
Why not?
On 11/21/2010 08:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:54:19 +0200
Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:47:57AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bushali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:59:25 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be paying close attention
to what's going on behind the scenes. They're in the tree for people
who know what they're doing to test. Even unmasked, toolchain
revbumps are
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 21:57:21 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend
everyone who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has been some important
patches added recently (see ChangeLog).
revbump?
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has been some
important
patches added
On 11/21/2010 04:57 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has
On 11/21/2010 04:57 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend
everyone who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
Why not?
Yeah why not? do you inform users of this?
Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be paying close attention to
what's going on behind the
19 matches
Mail list logo
