On Sunday 07 March 2010 04:30:55 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
What I wonder now is:
- Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla?
The security team uses (or at least has used in the past) flags on Gentoo
Bugzilla.
- Can certain flag states be required when searching?
It looks like you need
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:09:28 +
David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
This sounds like the sort of thing
On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and
for supplementary information Status Whiteboard could be used.
I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient,
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs. Otherwise it will be a real
trouble for us to sort things out. If adding more than one keywords
breaks anything, then I can tell you now it is already broken.
The only thing that
On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's flags mechanism is for.
Now that's what I wanted. Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:09 PM, David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
This
On 03/06/10 20:09, David Leverton wrote:
This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's flags mechanism is for.
http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/flags-overview.html
Good idea!
What I wonder now is:
- Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla?
- Can certain flag states be required
On 03/02/10 02:09, Duncan wrote:
... And here I'm proposing three:
BUGDAY(nomination)
BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate)
NOBUGDAY (or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...)
The latter would be for nominated bugs that were declined as
On 03/02/10 02:32, Alec Warner wrote:
BUGDAY (nomination)
BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate)
NOBUGDAY(or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...)
I think the last one is over-engineering a bit; bugzilla keywords are
not permanent
How are they not
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
To make naming a bit more consistent, how about:
- BUGDAY-CANDIDATE
- BUGDAY-ACCEPTED
- BUGDAY-REFUSED
They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled
down to stuff like BDYES, BDNO and BDMAYBE.
This looks like overkill to
On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
To make naming a bit more consistent, how about:
- BUGDAY-CANDIDATE
- BUGDAY-ACCEPTED
- BUGDAY-REFUSED
They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled
down
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for
supplementary information Status Whiteboard could be used.
I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and
more information can be provided elsewhere in the
On 02/03/10 13:39, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for
supplementary information Status Whiteboard could be used.
I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:02:05 +0100 as excerpted:
Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis aslani...@gmail.com:
I would prefer to keep the keyword for Bugday Members to administer.
I don't think that sending mails
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:18:39 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to mark
bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not
exist? Would it be hard to set up?
I would use it. I honestly didn't know
15 matches
Mail list logo
