On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
track it I'm lagging behind on this) I would like to express that I really
don't like the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
track it I'm lagging behind on
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ?
USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me.
NOT
Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
track it I'm
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:28:04PM +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be
Jakub Moc wrote:
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ?
USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of
On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Andrea Barisani wrote:
Yeah it could be treated as a bug, I'd rather fix that by patching wget
(--dont-be-a-pain-with-self-signed-certs yes) or anyway at *that* layer and
not by adding ca-certificates as a DEPEND since it has other implications
that we already
