On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:16:10AM +0100, Grobian wrote:
Unless somebody else wants to do it, I am about to step in here to keep
GNUstep in the tree. I already did some research on it, and it seems it
needs an update, and the previous maintainer masked a few of the CVS
ebuilds, so that eases
Unless somebody else wants to do it, I am about to step in here to keep
GNUstep in the tree. I already did some research on it, and it seems it
needs an update, and the previous maintainer masked a few of the CVS
ebuilds, so that eases things a bit. Seems many of the packages can use
an upgrade,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 11:05:15PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Are they all in package.mask?
No, not all of them - but Halcy0n has agreed to take a look at it.
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpjpq5MVfmAS.pgp
In December last year Savannah changed their CVS from anonymous SSH to
pserver, causing quite a few of our live CVS ebuilds to need changes.
Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and
mostly all, except the GNUStep ebuilds, have now been updated for this
change.
However,
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In December last year Savannah changed their CVS from anonymous SSH to
pserver, causing quite a few of our live CVS ebuilds to need changes.
Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and
mostly all, except the GNUStep ebuilds,
Hi Devs,
On 2006-03-18 12:53:09 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
However, since the GNUStep herd is void, no one has stepped up to fix
those ebuilds - meaning we have a bunch of useless, non-functional,
live CVS ebuilds laying around in portage, see the list below.
Did
