On 01/04/2013 05:31 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 02:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 02/01/13 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote:
last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap
either. there is no circular deps either.
>>>
>>> check glib deps iirc some non-glib
On 01/03/2013 02:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/01/13 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap
>>> either. there is no circular deps either.
>>
>> check glib deps iirc some non-glibc platforms have few problems with it.
>
> not if
On 02/01/13 17:28, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default
implementation from freedesktop.org.
pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the
switch from bundled
On 02/01/13 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote:
last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap
either. there is no circular deps either.
check glib deps iirc some non-glibc platforms have few problems with it.
not if you enable USE=internal-glib. i've added the USE flag on requ
Rich Freeman schrieb:
> Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implementation is
> what matters, so much as what works best for our users (and ourselves)
> in practice.
I don't think the "original" matters either. But I wouldn't mind having
libusb over libusbx, jpeg over libjpeg-turb
On 1 January 2013 16:46, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 22:29, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
>> That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there
>> likely isn't much to hold you back. As non-contentious topics sometimes
>> end up with no replies at all... consider
Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the
> >> default implementation from freedesktop.org.
> >
> > That's one awful double standard. :\
>
> Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implementation is
> what matters, so much as what work
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the
>> default implementation from freedesktop.org.
>
> That's one awful double standard. :\
Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implemen
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the
> default implementation from freedesktop.org.
That's one awful double standard. :\
dev-libs/libusb is the default implementation from libusb.org, yet
you are astonishingly eager to *avoid* that it is the
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default
> implementation from freedesktop.org.
> pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the
> switch from bundled glib1 to glib2 allowed dropping
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in
>> virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default
>> choice for new installations.
>>
>> dev-util/pkgconf has less
On 02/01/13 13:11, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote:
>> I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in
>> virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default
>> choice for new installations.
>>
>> dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependen
On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote:
I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in
virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default
choice for new installations.
dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is
faster than dev-util/pkgconfig w
On Tuesday 01 January 2013 16:46:49 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 22:29, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> > That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there
> > likely isn't much to hold you back. As non-contentious topics sometimes
> > end up with no replies at all
On 01/01/2013 22:29, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there
> likely isn't much to hold you back. As non-contentious topics sometimes
> end up with no replies at all... consider 48 hours of radio silence an
> implicit yes.
It didn't s
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 16:01 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is
> faster than dev-util/pkgconfig while being now 100% compatible
That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there
likely isn't much to hold you back.
I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in
virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default
choice for new installations.
dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is
faster than dev-util/pkgconfig while being now 100% compatible
This switc
17 matches
Mail list logo
