Ingo Bormuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
> >
> > This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
> > probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
> > be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
> > The bottom links
On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
>
> This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
> probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
> be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
> The bottom links which are hard to see or notice (cause they're at th
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:56:14PM +, kang wrote:
> Harald van Dijk wrote:
> >Even with its bugs, it's one of best browsers for MacOS 8.1, which I
> >still use. But if you can suggest a better one, please do.
> >
> >
> You might want to try iCab or opera. Well, I'd suggest you to run linux
> o
Harald van Dijk wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +, kang wrote:
>
>
>>Curtis Napier wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
>>>render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
>>>the mac is still a valid browser a
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +, kang wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote:
>
> > gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
> > render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
> > the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
> > p
Patrick Lauer wrote:
>Some usability issues:
>The top right textlinks are too dark and quite small. They aren't easily
>readable and don't present themselves as clickable items (especially
>with the dotted line below them they look like "random" text)
>
>
Hm, the "don't present themselves as cli
On 25-11-2005 12:14:53 +, kang wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote:
>
> > gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
> > render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
> > the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
> > possible.
> >
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:14 +, kang wrote:
> Now people can also use NCSA Mosaic. It's valid as long as you can run
> it. But a browser with vulns, unsupported by the vendor, with a broken
> CSS, I think you do not have to support it. Well of course, if you like
> it just do it ;)
Hmmm.. I thin
Curtis Napier wrote:
> gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
> render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
> the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
> possible.
>
IE5 for mac contains unfixed security issues which won'
Flammie Pirinen wrote:
2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong.
Not really.
So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to
Aarons's reference. [...] Check out
25.11.2005, 8:06:51, Flammie Pirinen wrote:
> 2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
>> So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to
>> Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in the meantime.
> Uh-oh. The usability regression from what the site was yesterd
2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
> I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
> accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong.
Not really.
> So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to
> Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in
I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong. Aaron was gone for months
and months and months so I was listening to the feedback from others and
trying to please everyone. I think I forgot that I took on this project
to implement A
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Like I said before, I rather like the infinity sign. The trustees have had a
> discussion on this part too. Their decision was that we need a "strong,
> compelling case for not using it since it is something the community has
> voted
On Thursday 24 November 2005 06:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge
> > > > discussion will be held on this.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion
> > > will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the
> > > development though.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion
> > will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the
> > development though...
>
> And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it'
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:49:47 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of
| > voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinity was just a
| > mi
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of
> voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinity was just a
> minor detail and not part of the design itself.
Yes, I remember that - I just can't locate i
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:40:45 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| The artwork is all part of the winning design. Any issues with the
| infinity symbol should have been addressed a year ago.
I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of
voting too. Back then, it w
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 01:40 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Accessibilty guidelines say that all text links should be underlined. I
> made an exception for the grey menu bar for aesthetic purposes but will
> not make an exception for any other links.
Given the above shouldn't the text links b
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:40:45AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
> If there are no more outstanding issues reported I will submit this
> current layout for approval.
the links in the footbars still dont have 'on mouse over' behavior
like all the other links
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:40:45AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
> If there are no more outstanding issues reported I will submit this
> current layout for approval.
there's still a ton of wasted space in the purple bar ... if that was
tightened up, more news could be displayed ... having the last
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:40, Curtis Napier wrote:
ps. I also found two graphical glitches:
- There is a misterious white bar just below the overview bar (see
ws1.png)
- The corners of the jump pads do not have the proper background color
(see ws2.png)
Fixed. In
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:40, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Aarons design uses a smaller default font, that is not acceptable from
> an accessibility POV. The main font is at 1em and all cursory fonts
> multipliers of 1em. The main font will remain at 1em which is the
> standard for the accessibili
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Napier wrote:
| The contents of the uppermost menu are to sites that are outside the
| www.gentoo.org website. They will stay in this location. They are green
| to contrast with the purple background to ensure that colorblind and
| other visual
First of all, thank you everyone for all the feedback. Your input is
important and greatly appreciated.
I should have said that the last update was not complete as far as
design was concerned. I was mainly looking for accessibility and
rendering issues on as many browsers/OS's as possible. I g
27 matches
Mail list logo
