On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 09:36:02PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > for bug 373219 [1], we are working on providing a functions.sh that does
> > not rely on OpenRc so that people who are not using OpenRc can
> > completely remove i
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> for bug 373219 [1], we are working on providing a functions.sh that does
> not rely on OpenRc so that people who are not using OpenRc can
> completely remove it from their systems.
>
> I can now report that gentoo-functions has been
Dnia 2014-03-13, o godz. 07:59:55
Patrick Lauer napisał(a):
> On 03/13/2014 12:52 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> >>> No, I don't think gentoo-functions should take over the symbolic
> >>> link in /etc/init.d/functions.sh; that needs to stay with OpenRc.
> >>> My plan there is to work that into a s
On 03/12/2014 7:59 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 12:52 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
No, I don't think gentoo-functions should take over the symbolic
link in /etc/init.d/functions.sh; that needs to stay with OpenRc.
My plan there is to work that into a script that prints a w
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:59:55 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 12:52 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Why deprecate it?
>
> I'm getting really irritated with the current trend of randomly
> renaming and movearounding things. All it does is confuse people,
> break existing setups and make d
On 03/13/2014 12:52 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> No, I don't think gentoo-functions should take over the symbolic
>>> link in /etc/init.d/functions.sh; that needs to stay with OpenRc.
>>> My plan there is to work that into a script that prints a warning
>>> message. It will stay that way until ope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/03/14 03:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> thinking about this further,
>
> There may not be a need to remove /etc/init.d/functions.sh as long
> as it is understood that this is part of OpenRc, not the gentoo
> base.
>
> In other words,
All,
thinking about this further,
There may not be a need to remove /etc/init.d/functions.sh as long as it
is understood that this is part of OpenRc, not the gentoo base.
In other words, tools that must work when OpenRc is not present should
source /lib/gentoo/functions.sh, NOT /etc/init.d/funct
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:02:13PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/03/14 07:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > The quickest way to find things that will need this fix is to rm
> > /etc/init.d/functions.sh and file bugs against things that
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:02:13 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/03/14 07:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > The quickest way to find things that will need this fix is to rm
> > /etc/init.d/functions.sh and file bugs against things that break
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:08:43PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:14:58AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> ...why not? As you've said yourself, nothing related to openrc uses
> >> /etc/init.d/functions.sh; if e
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:14:58AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> ...why not? As you've said yourself, nothing related to openrc uses
>> /etc/init.d/functions.sh; if everything else in the tree is going to
>> use the new gentoo-functions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/03/14 12:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> The relevance is that /etc/init.d/functions.sh is currently part
> of OpenRc's public API, and semantic versioning has a very
> specific description of how to deprecate functionality.
>
> If Gentoo nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/03/14 07:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> The quickest way to find things that will need this fix is to rm
> /etc/init.d/functions.sh and file bugs against things that break
> and make them block the tracker.
..is there a tracker bug currently?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:14:58AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> yeah.. I scanned that bug, saw his arguments, but didn't see anything
> afterwards that seemed to address his arguments (nor anything that
> specifically addressed the removal of /etc/init.d/functions.sh as the
> de-facto location)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/03/14 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:10:42AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 10/03/14 07:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> for bug 373219 [1],
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/03/14 02:24 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny
> > wrote:
> >> Dnia 2014-03-10, o godz. 18:30:29 William Hubbs
> >> napisał(a):
>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:10:42AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/03/14 07:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > for bug 373219 [1], we are working on providing a functions.sh that
> > does not rely on OpenRc so that people who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/03/14 02:24 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>> Dnia 2014-03-10, o godz. 18:30:29 William Hubbs
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Also, do not add hard dependencies to your packages on
>>> gentoo-functions
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-03-10, o godz. 18:30:29
> William Hubbs napisał(a):
>
>> Also, do not add hard dependencies to your packages on gentoo-functions.
>> The goal is to add gentoo-functions to @system once it is stable.
>
> Why? I'm pretty sure we were
Dnia 2014-03-10, o godz. 18:30:29
William Hubbs napisał(a):
> Also, do not add hard dependencies to your packages on gentoo-functions.
> The goal is to add gentoo-functions to @system once it is stable.
Why? I'm pretty sure we were working on having more explicit deps
and less @system magic. Thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/03/14 07:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> for bug 373219 [1], we are working on providing a functions.sh that
> does not rely on OpenRc so that people who are not using OpenRc
> can completely remove it from their systems.
>
> I can now
All,
for bug 373219 [1], we are working on providing a functions.sh that does
not rely on OpenRc so that people who are not using OpenRc can
completely remove it from their systems.
I can now report that gentoo-functions has been added to the tree. Also,
I have opened a tracker [2] that explains
23 matches
Mail list logo
