On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
channel. Could someone clear me up on this?
Thanks,
Donnie
Sorry, but I must second this, especially
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
channel.
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 19:05 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
All-
We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
overlays, this will be the
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
All-
We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
overlays, this will be the defining method of
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
channel. Could someone clear me up on this?
Thanks,
Donnie
Sorry, but I
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 09:58 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
With respects to Gentoo trademarks. That is a foundation issue and
would have to be raised with them.
Well, if it doesn't follow the guidelines[1], then it is improper usage
and would either need to adhere to the guidelines or quit using our
Mike Doty wrote:
It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I
did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is
willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put
forth yesterday.
I agree that it is devrel's place to help people
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I
did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is
willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put
forth yesterday.
I agree that it is
I've been thinking about Solar's email. I believe Solar is actually
very correct in his assessment.
I think I'll recant my initial statement about devrel. To KingTaco and
the gang: my apologies, you guys did the right thing at the time.
Thanks,
Seemant
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
All-
We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them.
There will be a summary
Mike Doty wrote:
All-
We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them.
11 matches
Mail list logo