Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Petteri Räty
On 08.07.2011 01:21, Dane Smith wrote: All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' respectively? Sounds good. One thing we could

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:52:36 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08.07.2011 01:21, Dane Smith wrote: All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote: In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' respectively? Sounds good. One thing we could

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Petteri Räty
On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote: In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has'

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 12:09 ??, Petteri Räty wrote: On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote: In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:20:43 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I believe that make them die wont improve anything but instead this will bring more frustration to our users. If you make them die you transfer the problem to the users,

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: And what would be the advantage of removing these functions? They have zero maintenance cost (as already stated previously, see below). Making sure people don't use them and through that removing the need to know what the two functions do from new

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 12:33 ??, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:20:43 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I believe that make them die wont improve anything but instead this will bring more frustration to our users. If you

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:16:02 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Uhm, no. The make them die would be done on an EAPI bump, so users won't be affected. You *do* test things before committing, right? I wouldn't expect this answer

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 01:19 μμ, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:16:02 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Uhm, no. The make them die would be done on an EAPI bump, so users won't be affected. You *do* test things before

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote: All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' respectively? Regards, I've just ensured

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2011 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote: All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has'

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/11 07:40, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 07/08/2011 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote: All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2011 03:12 PM, Dane Smith wrote: profiles/arch/x86/profile.bashrc:if hasq profile ${IUSE} useq profile \ profiles/arch/x86/profile.bashrc: hasq -fomit-frame-pointer ${CFLAGS} ${CXXFLAGS} sys-libs/glibc/files/eblits/src_install.eblit: local pthread=$(hasq

[gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-07 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' respectively? Regards, - -- Dane Smith

[gentoo-dev] useq and hasq -- link

2011-07-07 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sorry for the extra spam. I was missing the link: [1] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/function-reference/query-functions/index.html - -- Dane Smith (c1pher) Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 RSA Key: