Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-05 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > Fabio Rossi wrote: >> >> I'm proposing to reorganize the files related to Gentoo inside /var/lib. >> Currently we have this situation (at least on my system): >> >> /var/lib/eselect >> /var/lib/gentoo/enews >> /var/lib/herdstat/ >> /var/lib/mod

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-05 Thread Luca Barbato
Fabio Rossi wrote: I'm proposing to reorganize the files related to Gentoo inside /var/lib. Currently we have this situation (at least on my system): /var/lib/eselect /var/lib/gentoo/enews /var/lib/herdstat/ /var/lib/module-rebuild /var/lib/portage The main dir should be something like /var/lib

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:28:52 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Thursday 01 of January 2009 23:15:20 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:07:08 +0100 > > > So.. why not blindly use Unix layout everywhere instead (for > > > Gentoo news as well) > > > We do. > > /var/lib/gentoo/news ..

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Thursday 01 of January 2009 23:15:20 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:07:08 +0100 > > So.. why not blindly use Unix layout everywhere instead (for Gentoo > > news as well) > We do. /var/lib/gentoo/news > Seriously, find something useful to change. I realise it's hard around > he

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:07:08 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Thursday 01 of January 2009 22:03:55 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > No, FHS is not the most commonly used layout. The traditional Unix > > layout is the most commonly used layout. > > So.. why not blindly use Unix layout everywhere instea

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Thursday 01 of January 2009 22:03:55 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > No, FHS is not the most commonly used layout. The traditional Unix > layout is the most commonly used layout. So.. why not blindly use Unix layout everywhere instead (for Gentoo news as well) On Thursday 01 of January 2009 22:37:28

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Alistair Bush
Maciej Mrozowski wrote: On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 17:28:09 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: You could use the same argument to say "Gentoo must switch to RPM because LSB says so". No, I would be invalid argumentation - I know it - you know it, so let's not continue with discussion of this kind

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:55:13 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > That being said I'd rather propose to force Gentoo news to comply to > FHS as FHS is the most commonly used file/directory layout in Gentoo. No, FHS is not the most commonly used layout. The traditional Unix layout is the most commonly u

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2009-01-01 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 17:28:09 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:21:45 +0100 > > Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 16:57:12 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Gentoo does not comply with the FHS. It was established a long time > > > ago that FHS is con

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:21:45 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 16:57:12 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Gentoo does not comply with the FHS. It was established a long time > > ago that FHS is considered silly and any compliance is merely > > because the FHS people somehow

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 16:57:12 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Gentoo does not comply with the FHS. It was established a long time ago > that FHS is considered silly and any compliance is merely because the > FHS people somehow managed to avoid screwing that particular area up. Well, we're not

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:53:27 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 15:33:14 Fabio Rossi wrote: > > Ok, but at the end we have an exception in the tree > > (/var/lib/gentoo/news/) which is not justified (looking at the > > current discussion). My proposal has arisen after

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 15:33:14 Fabio Rossi wrote: > Ok, but at the end we have an exception in the tree (/var/lib/gentoo/news/) > which is not justified (looking at the current discussion). My proposal has > arisen after having seen the /var/lib/gentoo/news/ hierarchy. Then it seems wa

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread schism
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:00:35PM +0100, Fabio Rossi wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > The same could be said about /var/lib/init.d, /var/lib/dhcp, > > /var/lib/iptables or several other packages that aren't hosted by > > Gentoo. In the other direction, if the pack

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Santiago M. Mola
El mié, 31-12-2008 a las 15:33 +0100, Fabio Rossi escribió: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > Well, the impact is about the same wether you want to change one or the > > other (btw, what about other admin tools on Gentoo, e.g. > > paludis/pkgcore, by your definition they'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Fabio Rossi
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > Well, the impact is about the same wether you want to change one or the > other (btw, what about other admin tools on Gentoo, e.g. > paludis/pkgcore, by your definition they'd also have to go > into /var/lib/gentoo, right?) Yes. So you don't th

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:00:35 +0100 Fabio Rossi wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > The same could be said about /var/lib/init.d, /var/lib/dhcp, > > /var/lib/iptables or several other packages that aren't hosted by > > Gentoo. In the other direction, if the packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Fabio Rossi
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > The same could be said about /var/lib/init.d, /var/lib/dhcp, > /var/lib/iptables or several other packages that aren't hosted by > Gentoo. In the other direction, if the packages are eventually used on > other distributions/systems, should they

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:55:39 +0100 Fabio Rossi wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > Any reason for that? Aesthetics aren't a very compelling argument > > IMO, and the FHS also seems to favor the current layout (in my > > interpretation at least, as we're not really t

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Fabio Rossi
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Philip Webb wrote: > > /var/lib/eselect -- here > > /var/lib/gentoo/enews > > /var/lib/herdstat/ > > /var/lib/module-rebuild -- here > > /var/lib/portage -- here > > It looks neater & simpler to understand in the long run, > provided it doesn't break

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-31 Thread Fabio Rossi
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: > Any reason for that? Aesthetics aren't a very compelling argument IMO, > and the FHS also seems to favor the current layout (in my > interpretation at least, as we're not really talking about > "inter-related applications" in technical terms).

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-30 Thread Philip Webb
081231 Fabio Rossi wrote: > I'm proposing to reorganize the files related to Gentoo inside /var/lib. > Currently we have this situation (at least on my system): > /var/lib/eselect -- here > /var/lib/gentoo/enews > /var/lib/herdstat/ > /var/lib/module-rebuild -- here > /var/lib/portage

RE: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-30 Thread Sylvain Alain
Hi, this possible reorganization will impact how many packages and which one ? Thanks :P > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:31:12 +0100 > From: gen...@gentoo.org > To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files > > On W

Re: [gentoo-dev] reorganization of /var/lib gentoo-related files

2008-12-30 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:12:23 +0100 Fabio Rossi wrote: > I'm proposing to reorganize the files related to Gentoo > inside /var/lib. Currently we have this situation (at least on my > system): > > /var/lib/eselect > /var/lib/gentoo/enews > /var/lib/herdstat/ > /var/lib/module-rebuild > /var/lib/po