Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Here's the second version. I committed this version to gx86. All packages providing systemd units are free to use it now, yet I'm still open to comments. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-04 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Mike Gilbert floppymas...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc. See

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:09:03 +0300 Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe we should add a new USE flag that will install just the libraries. (USE=justlibs) Then you'd have to update nearly every package that deps upon GCC to have a [-justlibs] dependency. Arguably not so bad for GCC, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-05-04 Thread Henry Gebhardt
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Here's the second version. I think the inherit multilib line is no longer needed. I committed this version to gx86. All packages providing systemd units

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git migration?

2011-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Mittwoch 04 Mai 2011, 00:18:08 schrieb Alec Warner: ask on the gentoo-scm list? -A I'd say this is of enough general interest, and the relevant people are for sure also subscribed here... -A -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex dilfri...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git migration?

2011-05-04 Thread Matthew Summers
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Mittwoch 04 Mai 2011, 00:18:08 schrieb Alec Warner: ask on the gentoo-scm list? -A I'd say this is of enough general interest, and the relevant people are for sure also subscribed here... -A -- Andreas

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-kernel/git-sources: ChangeLog git-sources-2.6.39_rc6.ebuild

2011-05-04 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Wed, 4 May 2011 15:13:18 + (UTC), Mike Pagano (mpagano) wrote: mpagano 11/05/04 15:13:18 Modified: ChangeLog Added:git-sources-2.6.39_rc6.ebuild Log: Version bump snip K_EXTRAEINFO=This kernel is not supported by Gentoo due to its unstable and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass

2011-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 4 May 2011 15:56:32 +0200 Henry Gebhardt hsggebha...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Here's the second version. I think the inherit multilib line is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2011-05-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 05/01/2011 06:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Could you bisect Blender to find out why it doesn't work with the new version? If 2.26 still produced good results, 2.37a already does not. Bisecting involves fixing compilation for each version. I stopped getting 2.30 to compile because it seemed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2011-05-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 05/01/2011 08:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Isn't it possible to create a better SVG then? It may be. Of the three variants trying to match the Blender version that I have seen so far, none is a replacement of equal quality on the bling scale to my impression. They feel like tradeoffs, not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2011-05-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 05/01/2011 06:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Could you bisect Blender to find out why it doesn't work with the new version? I tried a few more versions now. While Blender 2.31a still applies the reflection texture, Blender 2.32 does not anymore. At least on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2011-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 05 May 2011 04:31:10 +0200 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: I think such a variant would be much more portable and reproducible than blender files. What I dislike about the idea of moving to a new logo is that we would give up part of our culture just because we were