On 06/09/2011 03:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
do we need some kind of policy around membership on special
project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might
be another.
in my eyes we do. too much power to be unregulated.
what does it take to get this rolling?
sebastian
Questions:
- What does reviving mean in detail?
A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
Getting back to maintaining the current code?
Why did you choose how you did?
- Have you spoken to Andreas Nüsslein who worked on a
re-write in context of an earlier GSoC?
Best,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/11 07:44, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 06/09/2011 03:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
do we need some kind of policy around membership on special
project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might
be another.
in my eyes
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Questions:
- What does reviving mean in detail?
A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
Getting back to maintaining the current code?
Why did you choose how you did?
- Have you spoken to Andreas
I was thinking of writting this in private, but I bet it will do more
good if I do it public.
I'm 22 (most of you could call me a kid) and a reasonably recent new
developer and I'm sad having to ask you, am I the only one seeing
childishness on your actions, and this yours implies at least
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Questions:
- What does reviving mean in detail?
A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
I am not necessarily interested in a complete re-write unless its
really warranted due to support for new features.
El 10/06/11 17:33, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
* Diego, Berlusconi a way better reason to be outraged I think.
Small clarification here: I'm not comparing Diego with Berlusconi AFAIK
he isn't a corrupt underage fucking politician, I'm pointing him
Berlusconi ruling Italy
On 06/10/2011 05:38 PM, Matthew Summers wrote:
Why did you choose how you did?
I do not understand this sentence,
I intended to write as you did, sorry. If that's still bad English: I
wanted to hear about your rationale, which you have explained by now.
Thanks.
[..] this tool has an
On 09-06-2011 18:06:02 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
If typos matter then they matter to everybody, and if they don't then
we should not care. QA in Gentoo should be a consistent experience.
while the last sentence is true, the first is not. if a minority of
people care about
On 09-06-2011 21:39:43 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
Perhaps you can generalise the discussion into when you do consider a
changelog entry to (still) be relevant?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Dane Smith c1p...@gentoo.org wrote:
Perhaps do council appointments if the lead steps down / if the team
calls for a re-appointment (there would need to be rules for this part.
I don't want to see a new appointee merely because the lead upset one
person.
On 06/08/2011 04:36 PM, Vikraman wrote:
* Repository, Keyword, Useflags (plus,minus,unset), Counter, Size,
and Build time for each installed package
How many operations do you expect for a submissions with 1000 packages
on SQL level? Will that be around 1000 inserts?
Best,
Sebastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/2011 08:54 PM, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
On 9 June 2011 15:44, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the lead is held responsible for the behaviour of the team's
member in respect to the QA work, I don't think it is
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:10:36AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 06/08/2011 04:36 PM, Vikraman wrote:
* Repository, Keyword, Useflags (plus,minus,unset), Counter, Size,
and Build time for each installed package
How many operations do you expect for a submissions with 1000 packages
Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 01.48 +0100, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
I am sorry but this is not a way for a leader to treat the members of
his team. I am retiring myself from QA as well. Do note that 4 members
have already gone from QA. This cannot be a coincidence.
For those who
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I like the idea of appointed leads instead of holding elections, it
fits into my big picture of less bureaucracy and more meritocracy
(see my email re running for council on -project). Appointments
would be made by the next level up from the lead.
16 matches
Mail list logo
