2011/9/8 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Done. Also, added an example. If nobody has further objections, I'll
commit this today.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Dunno but shouldn't there be two fields one for AUTHOR and one for MAINTAINER,
Also in the code do not use the autotols-utils...
On 09/07/2011 20:35, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org wrote:
Never once have I had any issues
with separate / and /usr, and none of them use an initramfs.
Ditto here, but that doesn't mean that problems don't exist. Right now the
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:52:02 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
2011/9/8 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Done. Also, added an example. If nobody has further objections, I'll
commit this today.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Dunno but shouldn't there be two fields
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:19:32 -0400
Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 09/07/2011 20:35, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Never once have I had any issues
with separate / and /usr, and none of them use an initramfs.
On 2011-09-08 11:19 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Whoever said we had to do what everyone else did? We're Gentoo, not a
pack of lemmings. If we have to, we should be able to create an
entirely new solution, never thought of before, that fixes the problem
for all parties involved, yet allows us to
On 09/06/2011 11:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-09-2011 20:24:54 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog
Removed: libffi-3.0.10_rc8.ebuild libffi-3.0.9.ebuild
Log:
[This is a placeholder. Please ignore.]
Considering that you seem to do this on a regular basis:
Please
Samuli Suominen posted on Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:54:24 +0300 as excerpted:
On 09/06/2011 11:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-09-2011 20:24:54 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog
Removed: libffi-3.0.10_rc8.ebuild libffi-3.0.9.ebuild Log:
[This is a placeholder. Please ignore.]
On 08-09-2011 14:54:24 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 09/06/2011 11:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-09-2011 20:24:54 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog
Removed: libffi-3.0.10_rc8.ebuild libffi-3.0.9.ebuild
Log:
[This is a placeholder. Please ignore.]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/09/2011 04:07 μμ, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 08-09-2011 14:54:24 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 09/06/2011 11:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-09-2011 20:24:54 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog Removed:
On 08-09-2011 16:16:36 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
The changelog entry message is irrelevant in this case since the
changelog already lists which files were removed ( -foo-1 -foo-2 ) so
please don't make us restart the old discussion about changelogs which
will lead us again to nasty and
On 8.9.2011 16.16, Markos Chandras wrote:
(Consider my refusal to reply any more messages in this thread as
an polite attempt of avoiding escalation and flame.)
Consider my email as a friendly and polite request to please change
your ChangeLog behaviour from now on.
The changelog
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd rather say we should do the work on real issues rather than
imaginate 'separate /usr' problem. Honestly, most of 'advantages' of
separate /usr are just hacks avoiding other problems.
I guess the irony in my case was
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:52:55 +0300
Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 2011-09-08 11:19 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Whoever said we had to do what everyone else did? We're Gentoo,
not a pack of lemmings. If we have to, we should be able to create
an entirely new solution, never thought of
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:16:36 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The changelog entry message is irrelevant in this case since the
changelog already lists which files were removed ( -foo-1 -foo-2 ) so
please don't make us restart the old discussion about changelogs which
will lead
Hello,
As new bash-completion-r1 eclass is in the tree now, a quick migration
guide follows.
The new eclass is simpler and more consistent. It doesn't enforce
USE=bash-completion or put any bash-completion-specific deps on
packages. If any package _really_ needs that, it should put out
the
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
3) dobashcompletion foo
- dobashcomp foo || die
Isn't that rather:
newbashcomp foo ${PN} || die
Ulrich
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:46:01 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
3) dobashcompletion foo
- dobashcomp foo || die
Isn't that rather:
newbashcomp foo ${PN} || die
Ah, sorry, you're right.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
1) USE-flag based support to cross-compile packages (mostly implemented in
multilib-portage)
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python, ruby or
php)
3) (internal) USE-flag based support to re-install packages
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
1) USE-flag based support to cross-compile packages (mostly implemented in
multilib-portage)
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:03:56 +0200, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python,
ruby or php)
The second one is already done in some eclasses, afaik php and ruby, but
2011-09-08 19:03:56 Thomas Sachau napisał(a):
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python, ruby
or php)
The second one is already done in some eclasses, afaik php and ruby, but it
might be a good idea
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:10:23 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2011-09-08 19:03:56 Thomas Sachau napisał(a):
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g.
python, ruby or
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:35:48 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
PM needs to provide us with a nice ability to handle all that.
I've yet to see a complete, detailed, accurate description of what all
that really is. It's a bit hard to come up with an EAPI solution when
we don't know what
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:33:03 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:35:48 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
PM needs to provide us with a nice ability to handle all that.
I've yet to see a complete, detailed, accurate description of what
On 2011-09-08 6:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Could you stick to facts rather than pointless accusations?
It is not an accusation and it is not pointless. For the last time:
Seperate /usr without initramfs used to work. Now it doesn't. What you
are proposing is going to make it well neigh
On 09/08/2011 10:35, Rich Freeman wrote:
It may have changed, but at least in the past you couldn't have root on a
raid5 without an initramfs - you definitely couldn't have it on LVM. So, if
you wanted to run LVM on raid5, you had to have a separate root that was
raid1 with the older
On 09/08/2011 16:02, Eray Aslan wrote:
Seperate /usr without initramfs used to work. Now it doesn't. What you
are proposing is going to make it well neigh impossible to correct later
on. We could have done a proper fix instead of going with the flow.
But I am not the one doing the coding
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 03:20:01 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
please stop committing packages that is not possible to fetch right away.
You can pick from three options:
a) stop using mirrors://gentoo/ and put it on dev.gentoo.org to your
public_html like most of us do
b) mask the package
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 05:27:05 Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:17:21 +0300 Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Moving things as openrc to /usr/libexec will effectevely barake old
systems with separtae / and /usr. So it isnt good idea
Old systems should migrate to initramfs, like
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 18:15:21 Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 09/08/2011 16:02, Eray Aslan wrote:
Seperate /usr without initramfs used to work. Now it doesn't. What you
are proposing is going to make it well neigh impossible to correct later
on. We could have done a proper fix instead
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 14:10:23 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2011-09-08 19:03:56 Thomas Sachau napisał(a):
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python,
ruby or php)
The
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
We have actually 3 polkit agent implementations in Portage:
gnome-extra/polkit-gnome
lxde-base/lxpolkit
sys-auth/polkit-kde-agent
There's one more: gnome-base/gnome-shell
GNOME Shell has its own polkit-agent
On 2011-09-09 1:15 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Under what setup does it not work now? I would very much like to know
if some recent OpenRC thing just hosed something. I'm dealing with
torrential rain here, thunderstorms, and I cannot predict when my next
power outage will be. Last thing I need
33 matches
Mail list logo
