Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 22:48 -0700 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò:
On 30/10/2012 22:44, Tiziano Müller wrote:
I agree. It really doesn't make sense to keep unbuildable stuff in the
tree. The point of slotting it in the first place was also to force a
rebuild of reverse dependencies to
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:45:27 -0700 as excerpted:
On 30/10/2012 17:42, Duncan wrote:
icu-49.1.2 seems to build just fine against glibc-2.16.0, here. I just
rebuilt to be sure. (With gcc-4.7.2.)
I said 1.50+, I'm referring to Boost.
Thanks. Makes MUCH more
On 30-10-2012 23:22:01 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So exactly what is (your) problem with the current eclass now?
Your eclass pretends to support Prefix, but it is broken in that
respect, and because some other eclass does it the same way (your
claim), you refuse to fix it.
--
Fabian
On 31/10/12 03:03, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 30/10/2012 17:49, Ryan Hill wrote:
And I had to argue to get 1.48 fixed. I'm not sure why we have to keep so
many unbuildable versions in the tree.
Because as mgorny explained earlier he's expecting some fairy to make it
possible to _always_
On 31/10/12 09:50, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 23:22:01 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So exactly what is (your) problem with the current eclass now?
Your eclass pretends to support Prefix, but it is broken in that
respect, and because some other eclass does it the same way (your
On 31-10-2012 09:51:51 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't do prefix and I'm _always_ expecting a patch from prefix@ for
prefix issues.
In that case, please don't invent prefix things yourself. Thanks.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Hi all,
In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2]
into the devmanual[3].
As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of
development information. I believe consolidation of this information
into a single point will make everyone's (especially new
Simply look at the metadata.xml files which can be found in each
package directory.
Though if you don't know these kinds of basics, I'm not sure you
should be doing *any* (semi- or not) automated bug filing.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Marco Poletti poletti.ma...@gmail.com
2012/10/31 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org:
That's rather unsurprising...
If you're going to file bugs in a semi-automated manner, might as
well try to assign to the correct maintainer?
Yep he should've assign them, but anyway the annoying elog messages
are an issue. And quite few packages
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you're going to file bugs in a semi-automated manner, might as
well try to assign to the correct maintainer?
How about a policy - no automated bugs may be logged to the bug
wranglers without their prior approval/review.
The php herd is the maintainer, so you should php-b...@gentoo.org (the
herd-to-email mapping can probably be found elsewhere).
Still, please get more of a feeling for how the Portage tree is put
together before doing more automated bug filing, please.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at
Maybe you should remember that non-devs simply /aren't allowed/ to
assign bugs correctly...
And if you look closer into these bugs, you might discover that jer
instructed this guy to file separate bugs. (see #440178)
aranea
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Some of the packages want to access that directory (lxml for example),
and they have to do globbing to guess the suffix. Since we use
per-implementation build dirs anyway, let's just use a simple '/lib'
there.
I'm doing this for out-of-source builds only since we don't set
--build-base for
This may help a few test suites and shouldn't hurt much of the others
(which weren't broken already).
Done only for out-of-source builds as that's where we control the build
directories.
---
gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
31.10.2012 16:39, Michael Palimaka пишет:
Hi all,
In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2]
into the devmanual[3].
As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of
development information. I believe consolidation of this information
into a single
29.10.2012 18:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2
by default? It seems pretty safe and I've done dozens of full system
builds etc.
Why not just make it an option to start, advertise it by
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, li...@aixah.de wrote:
Maybe you should remember that non-devs simply /aren't allowed/ to
assign bugs correctly...
And if you look closer into these bugs, you might discover that jer
instructed this guy to file separate bugs. (see #440178)
Fair points, and
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking.
A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not the
exception, meaning the argument 'I do not want to diverge from
$other eclass' is
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:22:01 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
One of the commits was before anything was said to ML (the EAPI
change), the comment was later but the commenter didn't notice it
just got fixed minutes before that.
I didn't ignore anything, but pointed
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking.
A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/2012 08:52 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
2012/10/31 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org:
That's rather unsurprising...
If you're going to file bugs in a semi-automated manner, might
as well try to assign to the correct maintainer?
Yep he
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do you think?
+1 love it. The split is pretty annoying, it would be great to have
everything in one place.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
The file is pointless if not everyone is using it. I've offered to
remove the file before, and I'm reoffering to do so now.
It's pointy enough for most uses. Let's keep it that way.
I would like to know what
On 31/10/2012 05:39, Michael Palimaka wrote:
In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2]
into the devmanual[3].
+1 it was on my TODO list for over two years at this point.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: [...]
The file is pointless if not everyone is using it. I've
offered to remove the file before, and I'm reoffering to do so
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: [...]
The file is pointless if not everyone is
On 31/10/12 17:09, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking.
A bit aggressive but its rather
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:49:37 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
Though if you don't know these kinds of basics, I'm not sure you
should be doing *any* (semi- or not) automated bug filing.
What if you don't have the privilege to assign bugs, but are willing to
do the work of filing
On 10/31/2012 10:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, li...@aixah.de wrote:
Maybe you should remember that non-devs simply /aren't allowed/ to
assign bugs correctly...
And if you look closer into these bugs, you might discover that jer
instructed this guy to file
On 31/10/12 10:56, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 31-10-2012 09:51:51 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't do prefix and I'm _always_ expecting a patch from prefix@ for
prefix issues.
In that case, please don't invent prefix things yourself. Thanks.
Thank you for reviewing the eclass. The
On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: [...]
The
Le mercredi 31 octobre 2012 à 18:08 +0200, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
On 31/10/12 10:56, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 31-10-2012 09:51:51 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't do prefix and I'm _always_ expecting a patch from prefix@ for
prefix issues.
In that case, please don't invent
On 31/10/12 17:04, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:22:01 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
One of the commits was before anything was said to ML (the EAPI
change), the comment was later but the commenter didn't notice it
just got fixed minutes before that.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2] into
the devmanual[3].
As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of
development information. I believe
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:14 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:14 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I agree, that'd make the whole thing easier. But until repoman can
commit in eclass/ it shouldn't be that hard to just run echangelog ,
as inefficient as that may be. :)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390651
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
eclass/ handling should go to repoman and the automated ChangeLog process,
should be rather straight forward for knowing person.
Perhaps, but right now the policy is to update it, so do it. The
policy is also to post
On 31/10/12 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
eclass/ handling should go to repoman and the automated ChangeLog process,
should be rather straight forward for knowing person.
Perhaps, but right now the policy is to update
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:32:25 + (UTC)
Diego Petteno (flameeyes) flamee...@gentoo.org wrote:
flameeyes12/10/31 16:32:25
Modified: boost-1.46.1-r1.ebuild metadata.xml
boost-1.49.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
Added:boost-1.51.0-r1.ebuild
On 31/10/2012 11:49, Michał Górny wrote:
In other words, you have thrown a big, destructive change to live,
stable systems without prior testing (and don't say you were able to
test it thoroughly in one day's time) and you have left them for other
people to maintain and fix.
I am really
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:38 +0100
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote:
+1 and btw move the devmanual in the wiki :D
That would rather go against the original idea behind the devmanual,
which was that it was supposed to be high quality and authoritative.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:18:42pm +0100, li...@aixah.de wrote:
maybe you should remember that non-devs simply /aren't allowed/ to
assign bugs correctly...
That is not correct. I am no dev and i do have edit-bugs privileges.
They were given to me on request by a developer from a project i am
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:38 +0100
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote:
+1 and btw move the devmanual in the wiki :D
That would rather go against the original idea behind the devmanual,
which
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 31/10/12 17:09, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Don't even try
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:38 +0100
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote:
+1 and btw move the devmanual in the wiki :D
That would rather go against the original idea behind the devmanual,
which was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org (31 Oct 2012)
# Build and runtime issues, bugs #340883, #369385, #435444.
# If you require a graphical monitor configuration tool and your desktop
# environment doesn't provide any, try
Quoting Chris Reffett (2012-10-31 16:17:20)
Yep he should've assign them, but anyway the annoying elog messages
are an issue. And quite few packages suffer from it :-)
It would actually be hard to find useful message which place is in elog
showing up every install. Why not move such thing on
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:39:14 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 11:35 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
The problem with ICU is worse than you expect. For once, with version
50, it changes ABI (but not soname as far as I can tell) depending on
which
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you're going to file bugs in a semi-automated manner, might as
well try to assign to the correct maintainer?
How about a policy - no automated bugs
50 matches
Mail list logo
