Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 03:19:17 schrieb Peter Stuge:
Again, I guess you have to make Mike go away now.
I never said that so please just stop it.
You threatened to preempt me if I wanted to become a developer and
found his practise OK - meaning that the behavior is unacceptable.
If
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:39:42 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
The wrapper is already in a seperate package [1], the currently active
and tested version (1.0) is in bash, also there is a (currently
masked) version 2.0 written by binki in C doing the same natively. So
you even have a
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do?
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:39:16 -0600
Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
doing with my
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Starting as a developer or aspiring to become one with that
attitude is not acceptable.
That doesn't make sense to me.
If the reason is good, surely it does not matter who is doing the breaking?
//Peter
pgpvkacjjiVYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Starting as a developer or aspiring to become one with that
attitude is not acceptable.
That doesn't make sense to me.
If the reason is good, surely it does not matter who is doing the breaking?
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote
I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
for all your hard work keeping this usable.
I'm not a C programmer, let alone a
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
I'm not a C programmer, let alone a developer, so this may be a stupid
question, but here goes... has anyone ever tried doing a HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) to present a reasonably stable interface to binary
video
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:28 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote
I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
for all your hard work keeping
On 03/03/13 16:42, hasufell wrote:
On 03/03/2013 08:11 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
There was a big ole' chat on #gentoo-dev regarding this. My
understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
Kernels 3.4 are not
On 03/03/13 19:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
Yet that is exactly what IUSE=vanilla is designed for... ;-)
Walter Dnes posted on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:28:50 -0500 as excerpted:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:07PM -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote
I am sorry that this package has been such a headache for you,
unfortunately binary drivers (especially) are often like that. Thanks
for all your hard
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we need that wrapper for? What does
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:25:03 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:21:36 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:02:40 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
you are called with ABI=sth argv[0] = your name
I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers
goes MIA so
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:44:33PM -0100, Carlos Silva wrote
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
I'm not a C programmer, let alone a developer, so this may be a stupid
question, but here goes... has anyone ever tried doing a HAL (Hardware
Abstraction
18 matches
Mail list logo
