On 09/25/2013 03:07 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote:
(unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits
which is a worrying argument on its own)
11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me
tl;dr: We should use EAPI5 features
I've noticed some libraries (e.g. poppler) having (almost) all their
consumers migrated to eapi5 subslots.
So upgrading those is now really neato.
Other libraries are still a bit less optimal. So there's lots of
revdep-rebuild / emerge @preserved-rebuild
Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 15:15:38
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Thus I suggest declaring a policy:
Any library bump that would trigger revdep-rebuild should be done with
the affected library package.mask'ed until all its consumers have been
properly bumped to subslot-aware
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:51:26 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
There isn't a 100% perfect solution currently, and I agree that
hurrying people will simply move us from not enough rebuilds to
too many rebuilds.
This is still a huge improvement.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
On 26/09/2013 20:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:51:26 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
There isn't a 100% perfect solution currently, and I agree that
hurrying people will simply move us from not enough rebuilds to
too many rebuilds.
This is still a huge
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:14:11 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 26/09/2013 20:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:51:26 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
There isn't a 100% perfect solution currently, and I agree that
hurrying people
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more of poppler-like issues to occur.
Can you give a an example package which:
-
This should be the final version of the news item. If no one has any
issues, I will push it on 27-Sep utc.
Thanks,
William
Title: Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs
Author: William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2013-09-27
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 06:51 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 26/09/2013 17:53, Michał Górny wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm
afraid forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt
will only cause more of
On 27/09/2013 00:12, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 06:51 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 26/09/2013 17:53, Michał Górny wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm
afraid forcing such a policy and/or hurrying
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Ian Delaney (idella4)
idel...@gentoo.org wrote:
idella4 13/09/26 09:52:25
Modified: ChangeLog package.use.stable.mask
Log:
Delete temp. entry of =app-emulation/xen-tools-4.2.1-r3 wrt Bug #484524
Revision ChangesPath
1.23
Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2013, 16:04:22 schrieb Kent Fredric:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more of
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 11:05 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Ian Delaney (idella4)
idel...@gentoo.org wrote:
idella4 13/09/26 09:52:25
Modified: ChangeLog package.use.stable.mask Log:
Delete temp. entry of
All,
I missed a message on this thread some how, thanks to tomwij for
pointing this out.
Here is the final version of the news item.
Let me know if you have any issues. Otherwise this will be pushed on
27-Sep.
Thanks,
William
Title: Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs
Author: William
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 11:44 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 26/09/13 11:05 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Ian: Why did you add an entry to package.use.stable.mask with my
name attached to it? An entry that I removed several weeks ago,
no less.
Heh, oops!
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:05:54 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Ian Delaney (idella4)
idel...@gentoo.org wrote:
idella4 13/09/26 09:52:25
Modified: ChangeLog package.use.stable.mask
Log:
Delete temp. entry of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 11:24 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric
kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple
William Hubbs posted on Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:10:49 -0500 as excerpted:
If you have / and /usr on separate file systems and you are not
currently using an initramfs, you must set one up before this date.
Otherwise, at some point on or after this date, upgrading packages will
make your system
please, not this again...
please spend your time on something useful:
fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think better
for fixing the problems those bugs describe.
subslots are far from perfect atm
On 27 September 2013 03:10, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
app-text/poppler
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462020
Reading this bug re-fuels my wish for virtuals to un-happen. Maintaining a
virtual with a massive list of || ( ) conditions is so so painful,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
please spend your time on something useful:
fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think better
for fixing the problems those bugs describe.
Those are both an awful lot of work for a very minimal
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:00:01 +1200
Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
( virtual/perl-* is a maintenance nightmare )
virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:53:14 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
please spend your time on something useful:
fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think
better for
On 27 September 2013 06:00, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
ie: every time there is a new iteration of Foo, one must iterate all the
virtuals that relate to it, and vet their need to be updated, and every
single update you do is just something thats easy to get wrong, when it
On 27 September 2013 05:57, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.comwrote:
virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted.
How would you recommend it?
Like for instance, we really do need virtuals ( or equivalent ) for many
things in there, because those things may stop being part of dev-lang/perl
at
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:06:44 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:53:14 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
please spend your time on something useful:
Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 September 2013 05:57, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.comwrote:
virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted.
How would you recommend it?
For those which are provided by perl itself, you could have
a corresponding useflag of dev-lang/perl and
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:03 AM, JD Horelick jdho...@gmail.com wrote:
My only issue here is that I feel like we should give users a bit longer
than one month (34 days, close enough) to make this change. In some cases,
it may require a large, architectural change which may take a while to be
On 11:03 Thu 26 Sep , JD Horelick wrote:
My only issue here is that I feel like we should give users a bit longer
than one month (34 days, close enough) to make this change. In some cases,
it may require a large, architectural change which may take a while to be
engineered and organized.
2013-09-26 17:04 Michael Palimaka napisał(a):
What about when the subslot of boost was equal to ${PV}? Was it really a
good idea to make everyone rebuild half their system for a bugfix
release, without even checking if the ABI changed?
It is wrong example due to 2 reasons:
1. Subslot of
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:39:44PM +, Duncan wrote:
William Hubbs posted on Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:10:49 -0500 as excerpted:
If you have / and /usr on separate file systems and you are not
currently using an initramfs, you must set one up before this date.
Otherwise, at some point on or
# Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org (27 Sep 2013)
# Mask further ruby-1.8 only packages
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/heckle
dev-ruby/main
dev-ruby/rcov
dev-ruby/rqr
dev-ruby/ruby-svg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org (27 Sep 2013)
# Mask further ruby-1.8 only packages
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-office/tpp
dev-ruby/ncurses-ruby
net-news/raggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
34 matches
Mail list logo
