Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Lars Wendler
Am Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:17:27 -0500 schrieb Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org: On 11/8/2013 7:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: Hi, I see nobody seems to take care of nagios packages anymore. There are numerous bugs (and many of them are pending version bumps). Is the sysadmin@ herd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 9. November 2013, 02:19:32 schrieb Ben de Groot: On 8 November 2013 08:55, Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote: Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 10:44 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit : in short: if a package requires version X then the ebuild should require version X; it can be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Alex Alexander
On 9 Nov 2013 12:16, Lars Wendler polynomia...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:17:27 -0500 schrieb Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org: On 11/8/2013 7:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: Hi, I see nobody seems to take care of nagios packages anymore. There are numerous bugs (and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Seems like I forgot to select reply all earlier. I'm going to look into that next week. I failed to resetup my monitoring after I left my previous customer and I've reinstalled icinga just this week. I don't understand people's insistence with a single product herd given we don't have enough

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.euwrote: I don't understand people's insistence with a single product herd given we don't have enough manpower yet and I don't want to have an explosion of aliases I need to subscribe to, the spam is enough as it is.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: I don't understand people's insistence with a single product herd given we don't have enough manpower yet and I don't want to have an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: But I don't see the point in saying well, nobody cares about nagios but two people, so we're moving it to a nagios herd. Might as well just use the two maintainers there, then. ++ Aliases and herds make sense

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Samstag, 9. November 2013, 02:19:32 schrieb Ben de Groot: On 8 November 2013 08:55, Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote: Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 10:44 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit : in short: if a package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 9. November 2013, 18:02:50 schrieb Matt Turner: (I also learnt as a recruit that versionless dependency is fine if all versions in the portage tree fulfill it. As a consequence I have been regularly dropping version dependencies from ebuilds for simplification if the excluded

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 17:30:43 +0200 Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: Herds are definitely not the solution for everything, but they make sense when you have multiple people interested in maintaining large sets of ebuilds. For multiple packages, yes; but I don't see any gain for a single

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed

2013-11-09 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.euwrote: On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: I don't understand people's insistence with a single

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sci-geosciences/osgearth

2013-11-09 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
# Pawel Hajdan jr phajdan...@gentoo.org (09 Nov 2013) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Depends on vulnerable # version of dev-lang/v8, bug #484786. Also see # http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/88811 . sci-geosciences/osgearth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature