[gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

2014-06-04 Thread Duncan
Tom Wijsman posted on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 02:24:31 +0200 as excerpted: On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:55:50 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: The only step missing is: Mask the new version on all non-systemd profiles so that portage doesn't try to install it (I wonder why systemd and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

2014-06-04 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:44:45 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 06/04/2014 08:24 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:55:50 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 06/03/2014 07:25 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 03/06/14 14:40, J. Roeleveld wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:29:17 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/06/14 07:11, Samuli Suominen wrote: I'm just expecting more from our users. I don't think the news items were ever designed for simplistic things like this. As in, GLEP 42 Critical News Item != Learning

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

2014-06-04 Thread Olav Vitters
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:20:51PM -0400, Greg Woodbury wrote: Then, they steal a general kernel command line parameter (debug) that makes booting impossible in certain cases. (Linus had to put his foot down on that one.) Almost your entire statement here is incorrect. Systemd still looks at

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, it *is* a simple matter of running one easy command. Portage does that for you with trivial ease. But portage doesn't tell you *which* is the one easy command. A news item does that. That is the real challenge

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:29:17 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/06/14 07:11, Samuli Suominen wrote: I'm just expecting more from our users. I don't think the news items were ever designed for simplistic things like this. As in, GLEP 42 Critical News Item != Learning

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:41:23 -0400 as excerpted: On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, it *is* a simple matter of running one easy command. Portage does that for you with trivial ease. But portage doesn't tell you *which* is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/06/14 19:21, Duncan wrote: Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:41:23 -0400 as excerpted: On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, it *is* a simple matter of running one easy command. Portage does that for you with trivial ease. But

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Ben Kohler
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Wrong. I'm always using the -t (--tree) flag with Portage and I would have seen upower being the culprit immediately, and second command would have been `eix upower` to see available versions, at which point I

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-04 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
Due to a mix of not currently using them, not much time available and Upstreams has a completely different concept of packaging, the following packages have been marked maintainer-needed and are up for grabs: net-libs/ptlib net-libs/opal net-voip/ekiga app-admin/chef app-admin/chef-expander

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Dale
Ben Kohler wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org mailto:ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Wrong. I'm always using the -t (--tree) flag with Portage and I would have seen upower being the culprit immediately, and second command would have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-04 Thread Matthew Thode
On 06/04/2014 12:44 PM, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote: Due to a mix of not currently using them, not much time available and Upstreams has a completely different concept of packaging, the following packages have been marked maintainer-needed and are up for grabs: net-libs/ptlib

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/06/2014 06:11, Samuli Suominen wrote: As in, don't you think I've considered, as a active GLEP 42 user, if there was a need for one this time? I weighted my options for 3 months before acting, and people actually agreed with me it wasn't necessary at this time. I'm really suprised about

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-helpers/xattr/install: use install-xattr

2014-06-04 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 06/02/14 12:13, Alec Warner wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:36 PM, bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote: From: Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org Currently bin/ebuild-helpers/xattr/install uses ${PORTAGE_BIN_PATH}/install.py as a wrapper to coreutils' install to preserve a file's extended