Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-21 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/20/14 5:15 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:36:32 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Exherbo is already running a more modular approach, I'd be interested what they have to say about this or which problems they were facing. Well the big thing is that unlike

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: [...] Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it, it may be actually useful to commit such an eclass. Otherwise people will keep thinking games.eclass is the way to go. Why isn't games.eclass deprecated

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 11:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: [...] Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it, it may be actually useful to commit such an eclass. Otherwise people will keep thinking

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread hasufell
On 11/21/2014 11:04 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 11:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: [...] Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it, it may be actually useful to commit such an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Tim Harder
On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the permission stuff in the eclass whether you like it or not. Changing the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 10:10 -0500, Tim Harder escribió: On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread hasufell
On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote: On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the permission stuff in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Tim Harder
On 2014-11-21 10:31, hasufell wrote: Are you serious? Instead of creating random competing concepts in one repository we should rather enhance configuration options, so that the USER can choose what he likes instead of the developer. I think this is a very bad idea. If we all decide to

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-21 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Before I reply with a simple four letter words let me restate one thing and than that will be it, and my next move unless council/devrel stops this for good my time will be spent better: playing Baldur's Gate. The problem is not that I don't know python. Because I do know python (now). The

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:31 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote: On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. The main

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-21 Thread hasufell
On 11/21/2014 10:08 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:31 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote: On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it as well, so I don't see a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-21 Thread Piotr Szymaniak
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:07:36PM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote: http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-checks/ updated per cron job, split by category. Much easier to handle :) Feel free to work on fixing things - there's enough issues that you won't run out of work this decade.

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-21 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-11-20, o godz. 08:06:05 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 11/20/14 04:37, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-11-19, o godz. 17:41:53 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu napisał(a): On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-21 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 11/21/14 18:05, Michał Górny wrote: And yes, I'm waiting for some free time to redo the toolchain. That I will help you with. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG

[gentoo-dev] Re: Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-21 Thread Duncan
Piotr Szymaniak posted on Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:06:30 +0100 as excerpted: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:07:36PM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote: http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-checks/ updated per cron job, split by category. Much easier to handle :) Feel free to work on fixing

[gentoo-dev] Re: more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-21 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:05:09 +0100 as excerpted: Dnia 2014-11-20, o godz. 08:06:05 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 11/20/14 04:37, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-11-19, o godz. 17:41:53 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu napisał(a): On

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/21/2014 05:06 PM, Piotr Szymaniak wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:07:36PM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote: http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-checks/ updated per cron job, split by category. Much easier to handle :) Feel free to work on fixing things - there's enough issues

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] install-qa-check.d/90world-writable: fix usage of missing function

2014-11-21 Thread Michael Palimaka
Fixes: 6dafdc288976 (Remove __eqalog __eqawarnlog) --- bin/install-qa-check.d/90world-writable | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/install-qa-check.d/90world-writable b/bin/install-qa-check.d/90world-writable index 2b435ac..1fb2a8f 100644 ---