Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-23 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
Thanks. But I think we can simplify that for now, since lua53 isn't available (neither in the official tree or the lua overlay) and =lua-5.2 is hardmasked. Anyway, I think, we need my default patch for luajit support here (which, actually, I'd suggest to apply on all packages in the tree,

Re: DKIM [gentoo-dev] Hello Everyone

2015-02-23 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 02/22/15 12:08, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: * Fun is lost for a long time. George Boole was wrong. Boolean values live on a continuum. Most of your statements were false. This is is extremely false. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail:

Re: DKIM [gentoo-dev] Hello Everyone

2015-02-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 02/22/15 12:08, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: * Fun is lost for a long time. This is is extremely false. It's a very subjective matter. I don't doubt that Gentoo is fun for some or many or even all developers. I also have no doubt that the process of becoming a developer

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/chef and its dependencies

2015-02-23 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (23 Feb 2015) # Mask chef and its dependencies for removal in 60 days. # This package lacks a maintainer and the version currently # in the tree is very much out-of-date. Several calls for a # new maintainer have gone unanswered. The version of chef # in the

Re: DKIM [gentoo-dev] Hello Everyone

2015-02-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 02/22/15 12:08, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: * Fun is lost for a long time. This is is extremely false. It's a very subjective matter. I don't doubt that Gentoo is fun for some or many or even all

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 92 bugs

2015-02-23 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 92 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2015-02-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hi! Please excuse bringing up a topic as old as this, again. Only bringing up half, actually. On 05.05.2011 07:36, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 05/01/2011 06:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Could you bisect Blender to find out why it doesn't work with the new version? I tried a few more

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2015-02-23 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 23 February 2015 at 22:11, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: I have streamlined those into ebuilds and a dedicated overlay Thanks! So whoever needs to render Blender files from 2003 again at some point should find working ebuilds to do that. Feel free to join keeping them in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2

2015-02-23 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 02/23/2015 02:29 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 23 February 2015 at 22:11, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org mailto:sp...@gentoo.org wrote: I have streamlined those into ebuilds and a dedicated overlay Thanks! So whoever needs to render Blender files from 2003 again

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-23 Thread Ben de Groot
On 23 February 2015 at 14:17, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov m...@mva.name wrote: I'd also say: neovim: CDEPEND=dev-lang/luajit ... dev-lua/LuaBitOp 1) I'm not sure luajit:1 fits the dep 2) LuaJIT:2 has it's own bit modules and is unneded LuaBitOp Thanks! I don't know that much about

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] man/portage.5: document sets.conf (bug 541188)

2015-02-23 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:14:50 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: This documents /etc/portage/sets.conf, /usr/portage/sets.conf, and /usr/share/portage/config/sets. It refers to Package Set Configuration section of the html documentation for more information. X-Gentoo-Bug: 541188

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] use_reduce: support non-string token_class (bug 541198)

2015-02-23 Thread Zac Medico
Do not assume that token_class returns a basestring. X-Gentoo-Bug: 541198 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541198 --- pym/portage/dep/__init__.py | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pym/portage/dep/__init__.py