Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > == > > My current idea would be pretty much that: > > 1. a new dedicated Gentoo bug would be automatically created

[gentoo-dev] Re: What is the status of phone/tablet support?

Richard Yao posted on Sat, 12 Sep 2015 17:24:41 + as excerpted: > I asked in #gentoo-embedded on freenode, but I would like to pose this > question to a wider auidence through the list. > > What is the status of phone/tablet support? In specific, I am curious > about: > > * Modern hardware

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > == I just noticed this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1308105 it appears to mirror

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 13 września 2015 11:48:54 CEST, Jason Zaman napisał(a): >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration >> == >> >> My current idea

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like > github issue tracker and github pull requests. > It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who refuse to collaborate on github PRs can still collaborate on bugzilla.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 20:56:07 Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least > > suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:27:32 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 20:56:07 > Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > > Hello, everyone. > > > > > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introduce ppc64le architecture into gentoo ! please share your comments

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Leno Hou wrote: > Which version of grub suitable for ppc64le ? Is there any patches to > ppc64le grub ? There appears to be at least partial support on the master branch upstream. Also, take a look at the grub-devel mailing list archives;

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like > > github issue tracker and github pull requests. > > > > It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like > > > github issue tracker and github pull

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least > suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort from the few > developers contributing there, and the progress is often stalled by > package

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 19:27:17 Jason Zaman napisał(a): > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > > == > > I just noticed this:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-09-13 23:59 UTC

Removals: app-misc/jdictionary 2015-09-13 17:06:11 monsieurp 6ab5fac app-text/jing 2015-09-13 17:05:05 monsieurp f16b411 dev-java/base642015-09-13 17:10:11 monsieurp b387cc8 dev-java/httpunit 2015-09-13 17:09:29

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/13/2015 11:19 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is > free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract: > > https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html > > "However, Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michał Górny schrieb: > I don't know if you didn't read the proposal, or if you are unable to > understand it. You are seriously *offending* me and the few other > developers who are trying *really hard*. > > So let me make this clear: I am trying

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure. Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a slave to whatever's hosted on gentoo. That way if anything gets screwed up on github gentoo could always

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 2015-09-14, o godz. 00:19:38 Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 > > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > > >

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-09-13 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-09-13 23:59 UTC. Removals: Additions: -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: > I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should > be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure. > > Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a > slave to whatever's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage.

On 14 September 2015 at 16:35, konsolebox wrote: > Many times we need to match packages like this: something-1.0.2a.* > > But that expression is not allowed with ~ (only targets revisions) and > neither with * (.*) is invalid. What does =cat/pkg-something-1.0.2a* do? (

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage.

> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, konsolebox wrote: > Many times we need to match packages like this: something-1.0.2a.* > But that expression is not allowed with ~ (only targets revisions) > and neither with * (.*) is invalid. > `So my suggestion is to add ~> as another operator. With it we can >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/13/2015 09:35 PM, konsolebox wrote: > Many times we need to match packages like this: something-1.0.2a.* > > But that expression is not allowed with ~ (only targets revisions) > and neither with * (.*) is invalid. > > So my suggestion is to