Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Dale wrote: >> That is why a link was posted for me to use github instead. I >> do realize and understand that git and github are two different things >> but it seems they can work together as well. It ended up that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Matt Turner schrieb: The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo I'd like to point out that some stuff that has previously been done in a single commit is now

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:56:29 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > As has been pointed out in the thread so far, gcc-5 only supports > go-1.4. dev-lang/go is at 1.5, so really the only thing that should be > built with gccgo is dev-lang/go. Also, the golang eclasses are > designed to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On 11/03/2015 04:04 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Matt Turner schrieb: >> The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively >> improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per >> month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo > > I'd like to point out

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] distfiles in overlays?

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:29:01 + Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Sometimes I have to move files from my layman overlays distfiles to > /usr/portage/distfiles > in orders to rebuild older stuff not in gentoo anymore. > > Should not emerge search in distfiles where the

[gentoo-portage-dev] distfiles in overlays?

Sometimes I have to move files from my layman overlays distfiles to /usr/portage/distfiles in orders to rebuild older stuff not in gentoo anymore. Should not emerge search in distfiles where the ebuild resides? What about eclass? What is the search order here? If I got a customized user.eclass

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

On 03/11/15 06:24, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a >> good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review >> platform as it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Tho I get Dale's somewhat confused and now belabored point as well. For > people who don't know how to do git on their own, as clearly he doesn't, > the official signaling of what the stopgap changelog alternatives were >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Apparently my complaining finally re-triggered some action, so sadly > this looks like the currently best strategy. You could have simply made a simple post pointing out that changelog generation appears to be broken and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Matt Turner schrieb: >> >> The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively >> improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per month: >>

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] distfiles in overlays?

On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:29:01 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Sometimes I have to move files from my layman overlays distfiles to > /usr/portage/distfiles in orders to rebuild older stuff not in gentoo > anymore. Wouldn't it be better to fix the ebuilds in the overlay to point at a current

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] distfiles in overlays?

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:51:53 -0600 Alex Brandt wrote: > On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:29:01 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Sometimes I have to move files from my layman overlays distfiles to > > /usr/portage/distfiles in orders to rebuild older stuff not in > > gentoo

[gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

Hello, In the last meeting, the Council has decided that the solution to various problems with herds, projects etc. can't be achieved via ad-hoc voting. Instead, a full proposal was to be proposed in form of a GLEP. I have collected the most important points raised during the meeting, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On 11/02/2015 09:17 AM, Leno Hou wrote: > -DEPEND=">=dev-lang/go-1.4:= > +DEPEND="|| ( > + >=dev-lang/go-1.4:= > + >=sys-devel/gcc-5.1.0:=[go] > + ) Note that the council has recently decided that the := operator is explicitly forbidden inside || ( ) constructs. The

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] AbstractEbuildProcess: validate cgroup release agent

Since commit e6be71af3f67ea274db455e9c24d5f84bd372c39, the release agent can refer to a temporary file if it was set while portage was updating itself. Fix it to reset the release agent when necessary. Fixes: e6be71af3f67 ("AbstractEbuildProcess: remove cgroup with release_agent (bug 561264)")

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

El dom, 01-11-2015 a las 14:25 +0100, Patrick Lauer escribió: > > On 11/01/2015 01:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим > > wrote: > > > And why don't just only generate them on rsync mirrors, but > > > remove them from git repo

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] AbstractEbuildProcess: validate cgroup release agent

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:13:03 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > Since commit e6be71af3f67ea274db455e9c24d5f84bd372c39, the release > agent can refer to a temporary file if it was set while portage was > updating itself. Fix it to reset the release agent when necessary. > > Fixes:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Justin (jlec) wrote: > On 02/11/15 23:38, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi William, > > but instead of adding > > DEPEND="||·( > >=dev-lang/go-1.4 > >=sys-devel/gcc-5.1.0:=[go] > > to ebuilds, you could create a virtual/go with that

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:45:00AM +0100, Justin (jlec) wrote: > On 02/11/15 23:38, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> How about a virtual here? > > > > I don't see that

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

On 2015-11-03 05:24, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:17:18 -0500 > "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote: > > > Vadim, please don't top post. > > But do quote some forty lines from the message you reply to. It > really helps in case someone lost the original, right? :-)

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] distfiles in overlays?

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 13:38 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:29:01 + > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Sometimes I have to move files from my layman overlays distfiles to > > /usr/portage/distfiles > > in orders to rebuild older stuff not in