On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Tho I get Dale's somewhat confused and now belabored point as well. For > people who don't know how to do git on their own, as clearly he doesn't, > the official signaling of what the stopgap changelog alternatives were > until the scripts were running to regenerate them from git, simply wasn't > there. Without that, confusion reigned, and blaming the user for > confusion in the absence of official signaling really doesn't help the > situation, either. >
Fair enough. If we had outright decided to get rid of changelogs we'd probably have published a news item with clear instructions on how to just obtain this info from git. Instead we opted to keep them, but they broke, so there was no news. -- Rich
