On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 1:33 AM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
>
> Richard Yao schrieb:
>
> >> To make code behave differently it needs substantial amount of code
> >> to provide you an example. You need to him O2<->O3 behaviour delta
> >> after all. But I will try (for a different warning,
On Friday, September 21, 2018 3:59:26 PM PDT Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Alexander Tsoy schrieb:
> >> + sign_binary_path="${KV_OUT_DIR}/scripts/sign-file"
> >
> > Yet another way to screw up modules building. It relies on some binary
> > in the kernel build dir that may break after
On Friday, September 21, 2018 5:58:00 AM PDT Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> В Чт, 20/09/2018 в 22:13 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev пишет:
> > ->%---
> > @@ -144,13 +158,16 @@ esac
> >
> > 0) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported with
> >
> > MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE_IUSE_DEFAULT
Alexander Tsoy schrieb:
+ sign_binary_path="${KV_OUT_DIR}/scripts/sign-file"
Yet another way to screw up modules building. It relies on some binary
in the kernel build dir that may break after openssl update (e.g.
soname change).
Maybe the sign-file application could be packaged, for
Mike Auty schrieb:
Installation will proceed, but the user will get a big fat warning that
the sys-fs/zfs package is potentially broken.
This seems like a sure-fire way to make users paranoid and/or
desensitized? People will learn to ignore warnings if we make them big
red and flashing but
Richard Yao schrieb:
To make code behave differently it needs substantial amount of code
to provide you an example. You need to him O2<->O3 behaviour delta
after all. But I will try (for a different warning, it should not matter
much).
Thanks. I had been incorrect about -O3 giving not us some
All three of these patches are now in the tree :)
-- Jason
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:38:15PM +0800, Jason Zaman wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Zaman
> ---
> eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 18:51 +0300, Victor Kustov wrote:
> [1] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9533#discussion_r211739558
>
> This patch add parameters to compile and install phases in waf-utils
> eclass. Need to solve [1]
>
> ---
> eclass/waf-utils.eclass | 8
> 1 file changed, 4
[1] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9533#discussion_r211739558
This patch add parameters to compile and install phases in waf-utils
eclass. Need to solve [1]
---
eclass/waf-utils.eclass | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/waf-utils.eclass
В Чт, 20/09/2018 в 22:13 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev пишет:
> ->%---
> @@ -144,13 +158,16 @@ esac
> 0) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported with
> MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE_IUSE_DEFAULT due to lack of IUSE defaults" ;;
> esac
>
> -IUSE="kernel_linux
>
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 16:31:23 CEST Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:24:48AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> > I don't understand what a potential solution would be.
> >
> > The various projects use -std=c++XXX because that's what their code
> > requires. -std=c++XXX can't
11 matches
Mail list logo
