On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 20:51 +0200, Kévin GASPARD DE RENEFORT wrote:
> > Thanks for clarifying that, it wasn't clear to me when I read the
> > earlier e-mail.
> >
> > Personally I think the long term solution is to identify critical code
> > bases that have a low bus factor before the bad actors
Thanks for clarifying that, it wasn't clear to me when I read the
earlier e-mail.
Personally I think the long term solution is to identify critical code
bases that have a low bus factor before the bad actors do and make a
concentrated community effort to help audit and maintain these code
bases.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:01:13 -0400
Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> On 24/04/01 08:40AM, orbea wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400
> > Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> >
> > > On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > > > Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > > > > On 3/29/24 11:07 PM, Eddie
On 24/04/01 08:40AM, orbea wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400
> Kenton Groombridge wrote:
>
> > On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > > Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > > > On 3/29/24 11:07 PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0400
Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > > On 3/29/24 11:07 PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> > >
> > >> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities,
> > >> you could forgive a paranoid
On 24/03/31 12:13PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > On 3/29/24 11:07 PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >
> >> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities, you could
> >> forgive a paranoid person for seriously considering getting rid
> >> entirely of them from their
сб, 30 мар. 2024 г. в 06:07, Eddie Chapman :
>
> Given what we've learnt in the last 24hrs about xz utilities, you could
> forgive a paranoid person for seriously considering getting rid entirely
> of them from their systems, especially since there are suitable
> alternatives available. Some
On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 08:57 +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> I stand by and reiterate my view that there is far too much of a cavalier
> attitude towards the matter in general out there including here in Gentoo.
> But not in particular here, it is everywhere where this is being discussed
> at the
On 4/1/24 3:57 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> No, I don't need to do that. I don't appreciate suggestions to "just calm
> down", especially when I'm not being hysterical. Your comment to me just
> reinforces what I mean when I say there is far too much of a cavalier
> attitude.
I think you're
Matt Jolly wrote:
> Hi Eddie,
>
> On 31/3/24 21:13, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
>> At the moment there is far too much of
>> a cavalier attitude about the whole thing being shown by too many,
>> including here I'm sad to see.
>
> It's obvious that this is something that you are very worried about, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
