Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: x11-drivers/ati-drivers, x11-libs/amd-adl-sdk, x11-libs/xvba-video

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Matt Turner posted on Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:16:12 -0800 as excerpted: > >> # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (26 Jan 2017) >> # Dead and replaced by media-libs/mesa[video_cards_radeonsi] >&

Re: [gentoo-dev] berkdb and gdbm in global USE defaults

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> Then there is no need to think about what is enabled globally or not. >> Point being, use REQUIRED_USE sparingly, and rarely a good idea to >>

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-drivers/ati-drivers, x11-libs/amd-adl-sdk, x11-libs/xvba-video

# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (26 Jan 2017) # Dead and replaced by media-libs/mesa[video_cards_radeonsi] # (or the proprietary amdgpu-pro, which is not in tree). # Masked for removal in 30 days. # Bug #582406 x11-drivers/ati-drivers x11-libs/amd-adl-sdk x11-libs/xvba-video signatu

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/x11rdp and net-misc/xrdp

# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (24 Jan 2017) # Depends on xorg-server-1.16, which is going away. Unresolved security bug # #602764. Maintainer no longer interested in package. Masked for removal in 30 # days. net-misc/x11rdp net-misc/xrdp signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > dev-lang/gnat-gcc Something I've wondered about since I used gnat-gcc for assignments as an undergrad -- why is gnat-gcc a separate package from gcc? Isn't the Ada frontend just part of gcc? Why not just a gcc[ada] USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi all! > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > my understanding of them): > > 1) git atomic commits [1]: > each logical change should be a separate commit. > > 2) revision bump policy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-11-13 23:59 UTC

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > from the tree, for the week ending 2016-11-13 23:59 UTC. > > Removals: > app-editors/mlview20161109-10:57 pacho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:35 AM, David Seifert wrote: > On Sa, 2016-10-08 at 13:57 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> # Pacho Ramos (08 Oct 2016) >> # Uses get_libdir at global scope (#593382). Dead for ages. Removal >> in >> a >> # month. >> app-cdr/nero > > I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > I personally tend to favor a mandatory DCO (we absolutely need to know > the copyright status of our code), and a voluntary FLA (which I tend > to prefer to outright assignment as I think it lines up well with our >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> You cannot currently commit anythi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > You cannot currently commit anything with a different copyright notice > to gentoo.git According to whom or what?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> In order to contribute to GNU projects, one must sign a copyright >> assignment statement. >> >> Gentoo does

[gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

In order to contribute to GNU projects, one must sign a copyright assignment statement. Gentoo doesn't have anything similar as far as I'm aware, which makes me question the legitimacy of "Gentoo Foundation" copyrights. What is the story? (I thought my other thread "Contributed ebuilds and

[gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

A former co-worker of mine is now at Google and wants to contribute ebuilds he wrote for ChromeOS to Gentoo. They add packages necessary for Vulkan (new 3D graphics API). For instance:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Kent Fredric wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:45:05 -0500 >> Matthew Thode wrote: > >>> Does pram allow you to pass options to git >>> am (signedoffby for instance)? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 11:27 AM, james wrote: > be able to offer guidance, hence, I have filed no bugs on Vulcan. I'm not The API is Vulkan with a k. Vulcan is where Spock is from.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Augmenting the CPU_FLAGS_X86 list and creating CPU_FLAGS_PPC + CPU_FLAGS_ARM

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David Seifert wrote: > Dear friends, > while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86 > list could be expanded a bit: > > avx512 - introduced with Skylake and Knights Landing > > I also propose creating a CPU_FLAGS_PPC variable

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Official support for migrating ebuilds out of games.eclass

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for > decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that > want games on other media (such as an SSD or separate HDD), or wish to >

[gentoo-dev] app-portage/tatt: completely broken?

Is tatt usable for anyone? Both the 0.3 and versions seem to hang after printing the Bugnumber: # tatt -b 576112 Bugnumber: 576112 CTRL+C gives this traceback: ^CTraceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python-exec/python3.4/tatt", line 135, in bugraw =

Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some > devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they > already maintain? No, you've misunderstood. He's saying people add new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> "doing your job" >> >> Remember that everyone is a volunteer. > > I am referring to arch testing as a job, because it only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> The solution is to have people with an actual interest in a specific >> architecture determine whether stabilising a package is viable, and >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 5 lutego 2016 07:38:44 CET, Jason Zaman > napisał(a): >>On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:35:44PM -0600, Gordon Pettey wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Kent Fredric

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:16:01AM +, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> commit: 37c1ec7ef31a51206421f03a2df489ec7d7ca244 >> Author: Doug Goldstein gentoo org> >> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 7 05:14:50 2015 + >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Dale wrote: > hasufell wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: >>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 Dale wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: die if ninja is enabled but not installed

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:22:48 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> On 16/10/15 03:04, Michał Górny wrote: >> > >> > >> > Dnia 15 października 2015 17:44:47 CEST, Michael Palimaka >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:23 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/12/2015 04:12 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:47:19 +0200 >> hasufell wrote: >> >>> On 10/12/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: Not sure how to read this. The whole idea

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wraeth wrote: > I am one of the users who spoke to idella4 about this, but I wanted to > repeat this publicly in order to highlight the point of view of > contributing user as opposed to a developer. > > Firstly I would like to say that I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > I'm not sure if this is what Ian is referring to, but between the sheer > quantity (flooding) and the way I perceived some of the messages to be > formulated, it all seemed rather abrasive in nature. Of course this > was

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ian Delaney <idel...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:56:28 -0700 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wraeth <wra...@wraeth.id.au> wrote: > >> > >&g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:44 PM, wraeth <wra...@wraeth.id.au> wrote: > I'm not trying to escalate the argument but you seem to have > misinterpreted my initial message. > > On 12/10/15 03:56, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wraeth <wra...@wraeth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sys-fs/zfs-kmod/

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:20:58PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2015-10-09, o godz. 15:40:32 >> "Richard Yao" napisał(a): >> >> > commit: 050bf38afc93a98c5176c95b3c4ffc01212bf46b >> > Author:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 83 bugs

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > Our bug queue has 83 bugs! > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 I suspect you used bit.ly to shorten a long bugzilla link, but it

[gentoo-dev] Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream?

In April I closed out ~100 bugs assigned to x11@ that the X11 team never had any realistic ability to fix ourselves (see most bugs about x11-drivers/ati-drivers). Most of these were fleeting driver bugs affecting a particular piece of hardware and a (often now old) particular version of the driver

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: x11-libs/libXevie

# Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org (28 Aug 2015) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 482304 x11-libs/libXevie

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-base/nouveau-drm

# Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org (22 Aug 2015) # nouveau has been in the kernel since 2.6.33 # Masked for removal in 30 days. x11-base/nouveau-drm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is the $Id$ line in our ebuilds still useful?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Tyler Pohl tylerap...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please tell me how to get off this mailing list? Please please please Well first you don't reply to an unrelated topic... But the instructions are here:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is pretty clear: reference the bug only in the summary: 1 don't make any of this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:42:00 +0200 hasufell wrote: On 08/09/2015 08:25 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: commit: 3fd6580a947db519cb60a4c2a05ec380ceb681d8 Author: Agostino Sarubbo ago AT gentoo DOT org AuthorDate:

Re: [gentoo-dev] (semi) last rites: several unused perl-core packages

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: # Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (13 June 2016) s/2016/2015/

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib and different CFLAGS for 32 and 64bit ABIs

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there! I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160). Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because -march=native did choose instructions that valgrind does not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Andreas K. Huettel wrote: 0. What names for the tree/repository. gentoo IMO this is the only really accurate name. I completely agree (with everything else in this email as well).

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Make seccomp USE flag global

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 02:44:54 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: Hello, at this moment 8 packages uses seccomp flag: app-admin/clsync app-emulation/qemu app-emulation/lxc net-dns/bind net-misc/tlsdate net-misc/tor

Re: [gentoo-dev] CPU_FLAGS_X86 gentoo repository migration complete

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/01/2015 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. app-emulation/bochs got local USE=3dnow and USE=avx since the flag control support of emulating the two

Re: [gentoo-dev] CPU_FLAGS_X86 gentoo repository migration complete

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. app-emulation/bochs got local USE=3dnow and USE=avx since the flag control support of emulating the two instruction sets rather than using host CPU instruction sets. Wouldn't it be simpler to use CPU_FLAGS_X86 for these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-01-18, o godz. 15:15:22 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, I would like to commit the following flags

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:00 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: * Stage3 archives are too fat See

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites -- long list

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote: 150106 William Hubbs wrote: This one is perfectly safe on a single-user system : please leave it there. I'm not opposed to it staying in the tree under one of

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/22/14 16:37, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 18:24:32 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: Well the side effect of this is that arcane and unmaintainable bandworms like toolchain.eclass are

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote: 0) This reduces code reusability. The eclass is used by sys-devel/kgcc64 in the tree and (at least) the hardened-dev::musl overlay outside. Yes, but while your claim that it reduces reusability is true, I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel a...@alectenharmsel.com wrote: * So many (~3MB output) warnings, especially upstream parallel compilation bug... thought autoconf handled this, but I guess not You still have to specify dependencies with automake, and it's pretty easy to forget

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependency

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/11/14 09:05 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 11/13/2014 05:30 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: Suggested policy to get the ball rolling: In general, a package must

[gentoo-dev] Maintainer request: sys-apps/kmscon

alexxy added it more than a year ago to the tree as part of the x11 herd, of which he isn't a maintainer. It hasn't been really seen any attention and is broken with current versions of Mesa. I've pinged him multiple times to see if he's planning to handle any of the outstanding bugs. Someone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes?

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, Some time ago we've got bug #510780 [1] asking us to bump subslot on LLVM even though the new version was ABI-compatible with previous one. It was because it introduced new APIs which applications could make use of.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LTO use in the tree

One thing I forgot to mention - LTO can also have detrimental effect on certain architectures. On some (eg. ppc), performance can actually be degraded due to increased register pressure. On others like alpha it's questionable if it'll even work at all... Worked for me on alpha, at least

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm strongly considering reverting these changes in the packages I maintain. I'm tired of having to deal time and again with multilib breakage. Either that, or someone else can take over primary maintainership. I'd be

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals for libudev and libgudev

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: Projects like the Council, ComRel and QA are there to protect Gentoo; and yes, people are (or should be) lining up to protect Gentoo. ... from QA. You don't seem to understand what Samuli is saying. QA is being used as an

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals for libudev and libgudev

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:18 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Tom... I am not sure if you know that, but your posts are difficult to read. You split up posts horribly and I am often unable to follow what you mean... at all. If I am the only one, then it's probably my fault. Definitely

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Patch set for git-r3 enabling full mirroring of upstream repo

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:18 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Why do you send RFC out when you ignore comments? I didn't see any comments suggesting any changes.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Patch set for git-r3 enabling full mirroring of upstream repo

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Why do you send RFC out when you ignore comments? I didn't see any comments suggesting any changes. There were 2. I don't think there were. But I'll play along with your trolling. A recap of the thread: 1) I asked what the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Patch set for git-r3 enabling full mirroring of upstream repo

After these patches, what are the differences between git-2 and git-r3? I thought the reason for git-r3's existence was shallow clones.

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: new global USE flag gtk3

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: I find it sad the QA team has been taken over by some of the new and semi-new developers who don't completely understand the implications of this decision yet since they haven't lived through the older

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org wrote: On 2/12/2014 3:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-02-11, o godz. 19:33:06 Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org napisał(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/11/2014 06:13 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Steev Klimaszewski st...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600 Steev Klimaszewski st...@gentoo.org wrote: Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up. Instead of having something working

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: +Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst Display-If-Installed: =dev-util/catalyst-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: my plan was to show this to anyone using catalyst. I believe this news item is relevant and interesting for anyone using catalyst, but if others disagree, I can restrict it to only those using

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:02 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: Sorry for following up myself, On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: OK, let's be conservative. Python and Perl scripts may break on some arches (I'd say it's a rare exception, perhaps 1%, but still). But what about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: While I'm adding USE defaults to toolchain.eclass and moving them out of the profiles, I thought now would be a good time to review a couple default flag settings. mudflap: This is currently enabled by default but I'd

[gentoo-dev] Re: New global use flags: 3dnowext, mmxext, ssse3, sse4_1, avx, avx2

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: I'll make these changes in a few days. Committed. Feel free to remove the local descriptions from your packages.

[gentoo-dev] New global use flags: 3dnowext, mmxext, ssse3, sse4_1, avx, avx2

And at the same time, clean up the descriptions of the other flags. The existing descriptions were clearly copy-and-pasted and contained things like faster floating point optimization for SSSE3 capable chips when SSSE3 didn't add any floating point instructions. 3dnow: Use the 3DNow! instruction

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flags: 3dnowext, mmxext, ssse3, sse4_1, avx, avx2

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2013, 00:34:13 schrieb Matt Turner: 3dnow: Use the 3DNow! instruction set 3dnowext: Use the Enhanced 3DNow! instruction set mmx: Use the MMX instruction set mmxext: Use the Extended MMX

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:56:32 -0800 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: Attempting to merge =x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1 results in: x11-proto/kbproto:0 (x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:56:32 -0800 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: There's a single problem. It can't enable abi_x86_32. Why didn't it just say that? As per the full output, it does: !!! Enabling --newuse

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:25:47 -0800 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: Imagine I had simply forgotten to unmask the abi_x86_32 USE flag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:21:53 -0800 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:25:47 -0800 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Martin Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: The new features use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask have turned maintaining systems with mixed ARCH and ~ARCH keywords into a nightmare: I agree. I have helped two friends convert to Gentoo recently

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Samstag, 9. November 2013, 02:19:32 schrieb Ben de Groot: On 8 November 2013 08:55, Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote: Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 10:44 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit : in short: if a package

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: converting /etc/mtab to a symlink

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1]. Are there any remaining concerns about doing this? If not, it seems like it would be pretty easy to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Martin Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: I was not suggesting inlining the list into the dependency but only inlining the USE-flag into the (single) perl ebuild. Currently if I have a package which needs e.g. Term-ANSI-Color, but not in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: FEATURES=binchecks strip for plain file packages e.g. latex, perl, python

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Justin (jlec) j...@gentoo.org wrote: what is your opinion to set FEATURES=binchecks strip for all those packages which purely install files. For example python package only installing scripts, or perl packages or latex. There might be more. It may help to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Minor arches (was: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10)

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Rich Freeman wrote: I didn't really get any response to this one way or another. At the last council meeting a majority of the votes were in favor of delaying taking action, so this is back on the

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: The license contains nasty clauses like this: If you are a European Consumer you must not export Software outside the country in which you download it without our prior written permission. I.e., if you install the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, It's time of year again to consider moving a few arches to dev-only status. I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords - s390 - sh - ia64 - alpha - m68k - sparc I want some level between

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: The proposal is to drop stable keywords on arches that cannot keep up. Do you feel this is not the case on alpha? I'm not sure if that's my claim. I'm worried because I think it might be a disaster for alpha (and perhaps

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Is there an alternative? afaik a profile can be either stable,dev or exp. I can't see how we can implement something between stable and dev. And what would that represent? It may or may not be stable? If this is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote: And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general progress

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd team consensus?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote: Le dimanche 11 août 2013 à 22:09 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: It doesn't help to keep so aggressively pushing it. Neither does so aggressively pushing against it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib conversion: Please keep building binaries for all target ABIs

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: ...so, allowing for the ability of 32bit userland with 64bit toolchain (via, say, setting ABI_X86=32 in make.conf) using the eclasses is just outright not ever going to happen? Never mind not supporting it, but essentially

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:04:56 -0700 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: I committed it last night before your email. # Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior discussion # on gentoo-dev. n32 n64

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2013-07-29, o godz. 17:21:15 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Any objections to me adding an ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND variable so that I can take advantage of the multilib work on mips? But please sent

[gentoo-dev] media-tv/xmltv bugs

All versions of xmltv in the tree are EAPI=0. It needs a version bump (bug 288927), an updated home page (bug 325437), and to be ported to EAPI=5 and stabilized (bug 479056). Anyone use it and want to handle these bugs?

[gentoo-dev] Adding ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND

Hi, Any objections to me adding an ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND variable so that I can take advantage of the multilib work on mips? Thanks, Matt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:28 PM, yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly. Doesn't it actually require them built statically, or simply that the necessary libraries are also in the initramfs? I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: go ahead -- note that some packages have broken multilib deps though Thanks! ah, and it wont work if you dont add support to multilib-build.eclass also. Of course :)

[gentoo-dev] Autobuilds go to /experimental and to /releases only when someone actually tests them

(I sent this to gentoo-releng@. Resending to gentoo-dev@ for a wider audience) Can we make autobuilds go to /experimental and then only move them to /releases when someone actually tests them? Looking at bugzilla and listening in #gentoo-releng, it's kind of embarrassing how often someone

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5, EAPI=5 would be useful for both the mips team (for bug 477956) and for catalyst builders (for subslot dependencies when dealing with binary

Re: [gentoo-dev] new category: games-adventure/

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Diego, hasufell wrote: I would object... 10 games are wa too few for a new category and especially pkg moves.. 1 app-antivirus/ 3 net-zope/ 5 x11-base/ 7 gpe-utils/ 8 app-officeext/ 11

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/10/2013 10:03 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:27:46PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: The other thing we needed to do was completely remove the use of or building of binpkgs during the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >