On Thursday 24 May 2012 00:19:45 Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/23/2012 09:06 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Sometimes people wrap long lines in their ebuilds to make it easier to
read, but this causes us issues when doing line-by-line checking. So
automatically unroll those lines before passing
and missing based on the checks.
URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/417159
URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/417231
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
v2
- fix optimization aspects
bin/repoman |6 +-
pym/repoman/checks.py | 161
Sometimes people wrap long lines in their ebuilds to make it easier to
read, but this causes us issues when doing line-by-line checking. So
automatically unroll those lines before passing the full content down
to our checkers.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
v3
- use
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 20:16:12 hasufell wrote:
Thanks, I'v implemented most of that, but your proposal about
non-duplicated list in case) has multiple problems. The only cases
that actually work with that snippet are:
16x16|22x22|24x24|32x32|36x36|48x48|64x64|72x72|96x96|scalable.
All
and missing based on the checks.
URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/417159
URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/417231
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
bin/repoman |6 +-
pym/repoman/checks.py | 143 -
pym/repoman/errors.py |1 -
3
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 15:21:51 Mike Frysinger wrote:
+ self._inherit_re = re.compile(r'^\s*inherit\s(.*\s)?%s(\s|$)' %
in scanning the whole tree, this seems to cause some issues (not new) with
extended constructs and not detecting this ebuilds inherits an eclass
directly. some
On Monday 21 May 2012 12:08:21 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:36 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2012 02:41:18 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call
On Monday 21 May 2012 02:41:18 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 06:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the
package uses gettext. the configure check might seem naïve, but this is
how autoreconf itself does
On Monday 21 May 2012 15:04:44 Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.
eclass?r1=1.133r2=1.134
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
of nowhere. I don't believe this
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
remove eutils from
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote:
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing
On Monday 21 May 2012 15:58:24 hasufell wrote:
On 05/21/2012 07:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell wrote:
I want support for installing icons into the appropriate
directories which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just
pixmaps.
proposal
On Sunday 20 May 2012 19:24:13 hasufell wrote:
case ${2} in
please use $1/$2/etc... with positional variables when possible
16|22|24|32|36|48|64|72|96|128|192|256)
size=${2}x${2};;
i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the package
uses gettext. the configure check might seem naïve, but this is how autoreconf
itself does it. this hopefully shouldn't break any packages (at least, none
that weren't already broken), but if you guys start seeing
any complaints ?
-mike
Index: profiles/base/packages
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -p -r1.62 packages
--- profiles/base/packages 12 Mar 2012 09:13:37 -
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 07:29:36 Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
howtos) how to handle Werror.
As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
-Werror to be short-sighted
On Monday 14 May 2012 03:53:53 Walter Dnes wrote:
My question... is this API stable or deprecated? I.e. can I count on
it being around for a while? I figure this question is a developer type
question rather than ordinary user type.
if userspace is relying on stuff in /sys, then it's part
On Monday 14 May 2012 11:44:17 hasufell wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260867
However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
howtos) how to handle Werror.
Is there a common opinion on that. And shouldn't we add that to the
documentation then?
the common
On Monday 14 May 2012 03:33:58 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On 05/11/2012 06:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
+multijob_child_init() {
+ trap 'echo ${BASHPID} $? '${mj_control_fd} EXIT
+ trap 'exit 1' INT TERM
+}
Just wondering why $! in parent isn't used anywhere, even not for some
On Monday 14 May 2012 13:37:40 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2012 04:44:12 Zac Medico wrote:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=b4fb
a3 e9fa2e285244de491f57700978158c1838
should really fix it to make the code parallel safe rather than disabling
On Monday 14 May 2012 18:42:07 Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/14/2012 01:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2012 15:08:32 Zac Medico wrote:
Actually, the inode_var_name thing will not work unless it's all in
one process.
hmm, true, but that's the level we currently parallelize
On Friday 11 May 2012 13:32:46 Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/11/2012 09:39 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
+multijob_finish() {
+ local ret=0
+ while [[ ${mj_num_jobs} -gt 0 ]] ; do
+ multijob_finish_one
+ : $(( ret += $? ))
+ done
+ # Let bash clean up its internal
On Thursday 10 May 2012 15:01:06 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 09.05.2012 15:47, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL
being required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9
in the ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16
our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL being
required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9 in the
ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16 isn't a stretch.
the driving force here is that glibc upstream is looking to set the min kernel
version
if you're not using arm, or you're using softfp, then feel free to stop
reading
i've backported the patches from upstream gcc/glibc to use the new ldso paths
for arm hardfp targets. atm, this is in glibc-2.15 and gcc-4.5.3 and
gcc-4.6.3. so if you have one of these systems where you're
On Sunday 06 May 2012 17:56:41 Michael Sterrett wrote:
I prefer it right after IUSE which is where it currently is in skel.ebuild.
this
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 05 May 2012 13:10:10 Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more users
On Friday 04 May 2012 05:30:31 Jeff Horelick wrote:
If anyone would like to help me converting random packages/categories,
it would be GREATLY appreciated. This is difficult work and it has
literally taken up almost all of my free time for the past 2 days or
so, but I have well over half the
On Friday 04 May 2012 12:36:20 Steven J Long wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
- this is why /etc/localtime is no longer a symlink to
/usr/share/zoneinfo/
- don't think that makes any difference to rescue situation.
no, but that isn't the driving factor here. programs get executed before /usr
On Friday 04 May 2012 05:43:55 Samuli Suominen wrote:
=dev-util/pkgconfig- with USE=internal-glib in Portage. I'm
hoping this will render the pkg-config-lite useless so we can drop it.
I'm very much intrested in knowing if this matches the requirements for
doing so, so I can decide
On Friday 04 May 2012 15:25:58 David Leverton wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
On 03/05/12 16:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you need to think bigger. Chromium supports joystick inputs (which come
and go) for playing games in the browser, so udev makes sense.
So is it using libudev to get
On Friday 04 May 2012 21:06:52 Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:58:24PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Remember, you are passing the complexity of insisting that you do not
want these things to the people managing the packages and trying to
support the system in so many different
On Thursday 03 May 2012 17:39:30 Walter Dnes wrote:
I think Chromium's problem is that it's based on Chrome.
you've got that wrong. Chrome is based on Chromium.
And Google is pulling an AOL by trying to turn Chrome into an OS for its
Chromebooks.
ChromeOS and Chrome are run as
On Thursday 03 May 2012 20:49:25 Luca Barbato wrote:
On 03/05/12 16:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2012 17:39:30 Walter Dnes wrote:
I fail to understand why a *WEB BROWSER* needs elfutils and dbus and
udev as hard-coded dependancies.
you need to think bigger. Chromium
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:11:58 Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
we've got an implementation in perl (i'm not interested in), but there is
also pkg-config-lite and pkgconf. they should be compatible with the
canonical pkg
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:04:57 Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Oops, something went wrong here. Please fix your terminal/editor encoding
to unicode.
I have two questions:
1. Was this a repoman or echangelog generated entry?
repoman can't
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 16:49:21 Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:04:57 Mike Gilbert wrote:
2. If so, do these tools need to be fixed to always generate UTF-8?
i don't think either of these tools
On Thursday 03 May 2012 00:25:25 Naohiro Aota wrote:
Mike Gilbert writes:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Oops, something went wrong here. Please fix your terminal/editor
encoding to unicode.
I have two questions:
1. Was this a repoman or echangelog
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state is
what i'm whining about, not that udev requires devtmpfs.
So why did you decide to whine instead
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:45:01 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state
is what i'm whining about, not that udev
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 12:51:55 William Hubbs wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:45:01AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
we already have examples of the init scripts modifying
On Monday 30 April 2012 01:28:58 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:48:55AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it leaves your system in a hard to recover state because you happened to
forget to check a filesystem option (which ironically isn't under
Filesystems in the kernel). it's
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:34:18 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox
paths symlink to that so there's no overhead). this new
On Monday 30 April 2012 06:35:20 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 05:00, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is all in busybox-1.20.0 which is now in the tree. if people want
to try it out before i unmask it, that'd be great.
If you insist on calling other applets from C instead
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:16:40 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
I'd just like to say, i'm also an Atheme project member and I have
authorisation from nenolod (the primary pkgconf developer
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source
and distribute a favored binary-only derivative.
err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:14:19 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:34:18 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:32:35 Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff
On Monday 30 April 2012 13:16:52 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 19:03, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i don't know what you mean by OS functions, but the whole point is that
this code *cannot* execute *any* external program by default.
I meant calling mount(2) directly instead
On Monday 30 April 2012 15:42:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/30/2012 10:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee
On Monday 30 April 2012 14:27:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
+1 for creating the virtual and migrating the tree to use
virtual/pkgconfig. although, on the otherhand, you could just use
package.provided for thesetype of unsupported experiments (like i'm
doing with pkgconfig-openbsd)
ok, with no one
On Monday 30 April 2012 22:57:29 Walter Dnes wrote:
The one thing I'm leary of is moving the actual app from /bin/busybox
to /ginit. IANACP (I Am Not A C Programmer), let alone a developer, so
I may be missing something. Is there an overwhelming reason to depart
from the standard location
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:03:48 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 06:35:20 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
there is still no need to mount /proc and parse
/proc/mounts in order to find out whether a directory is a mount
point, since Busybox has a mountpoint applet (and of course, one
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a
lighter alternative for embedded/alternative systems. as such, i'd like to
introduce a
On Friday 27 April 2012 13:29:54 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Since I've been configuring a couple of systems lately for remote
access, which include configuring the serial console, I'm wondering if
it would be a good idea to change our inittab so that the default
(commented out) definition of
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this will install
a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox paths symlink to that
so there's no overhead). this new applet has a hand written set of commands
to automatically mount /dev /proc /sys /usr and seed /dev, and
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't
On Monday 30 April 2012 00:31:52 William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:00:26PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
finally, since the recent udev-mount init.d script is completely brain
dead and refuses to execute unless devtmpfs is enabled, this code will
also automatically mount+seed
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 12:10:05 Steven J Long wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
Another issue to consider is binaries that want to access things in
/usr/share/*. If a binary in /{bin,sbin} needs to access something in
/usr/share/*, you have two choices. move the binary to /usr or move the
On Friday 27 April 2012 03:30:43 Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/26/2012 11:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/26/2012 11:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
I'd like to suggest we introduce
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:43:15 Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 04/26/2012 06:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
I'd like to suggest we introduce the following very useful
feature, as soon as possible (which likely means in the next
EAPI?):
* two new files in profile directories supported,
On Thursday 26 April 2012 18:03:54 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
* two new files in profile directories supported, package.use.stable.mask
and package.use.stable.force
* syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
* meaning is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force,
On Wednesday 25 April 2012 05:27:10 Fabio Erculiani wrote:
Like it happened with gtk-pixbuf-query-loaders, gtk-query-immodules is
used in an unsafe way as well.
There are several reasons that could make gtk-query-immodules fail at
runtime (SIG*, missing sonames, etc).
Using it this way is
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three
days if there are no objections. But I'd like some feedback for the
move of the file in /var. Opinions?
considering the server generates it and the end user never does,
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:45:22 Paul Varner wrote:
On 04/24/12 11:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:11:44PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
log from #gentoo-portage: tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would
it make sence to generate local.use.desc in /var/cache, or
On Monday 23 April 2012 15:19:31 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
# emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
How about mentioning revdep-rebuild in the instructions?
no
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but
sometimes users have patches which touch
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:18:59 Michał Górny wrote:
It's simply better just to assume: if user wants user patches, he/she
needs to have necessary deps installed.
if the package doesn't ever run autotools itself, i think this assumption is
fine. set AUTOTOOLS_AUTO_DEPEND=no before inherting
On Sunday 22 April 2012 00:44:11 Steven J Long wrote:
I can find nothing overriding it in portage, which makes sense, since in
general one cannot know if the package in question uses gmake .LIBPATTERNS
to link to locally-built libs. However I can't help thinking of it as
harmful for a package
On Friday 20 April 2012 15:38:19 Leho Kraav wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz
(-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they
want to kill off the extra
On Friday 20 April 2012 16:06:02 Leho Kraav wrote:
On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up.
$ EPATCH_OPTS=--ignore-whitespace emerge -va pf-sources
that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside
the openssl project has started a new trend in keeping minor versions ABI
compatible. in the past, 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 had different SONAMEs (because they
diff ABIs). but now with 1.0.1, the minor/patch versions should have the same
SONAME and ABI.
however, the new 1.0.1 ebuilds have been masked
no complaints, so here's the patch. precedence order is EPATCH_COMMON_OPTS
then EPATCH_OPTS then whatever has been specified on the cmdline.
so you can do:
EPATCH_OPTS=-F0
epatch all these patches will use -F0
epatch -p0 patches will use -p0 and -F0
epatch all
On Thursday 19 April 2012 23:24:19 Mike Frysinger wrote:
@@ -445,6 +473,7 @@ epatch() {
local patch_cmd
while [[ ${count} -lt 5 ]] ; do
patch_cmd=${BASH_ALIASES[patch]:-patch} -p${count}
+einfo $patch_cmd
# Generate
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 12:59:13 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700 Zac Medico wrote:
Funtoo has support for FEATURES=localpatch, which does the epatch_user
thing before src_prepare. I think it should really go after
src_prepare, in order to apply patches after
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 22:14:54 hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
How about unmasking it now?
file a bug for the arm team to request keywordings. we'll probably say yes.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
You can just follow the version bump request:
On Sunday 15 April 2012 04:16:41 Ryan Hill wrote:
Is there any reason why this couldn't just be done in the package manager,
making user patches available for all ebuilds without code changes?
i originally added it to eutils eclass and only called it in some ebuilds
because people were against
On Sunday 15 April 2012 21:04:01 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote:
Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
be a way to compare eix outputs with ${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME} from bug
summaries (bugs without that naming
On Thursday 12 April 2012 15:53:07 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
There is consensus in the gentoo-pms mailing list that we should
tighten the rules for the position of the EAPI assignment in ebuilds,
namely that it should take place in the first non-blank and
non-comment line.
The devmanual already
On Thursday 12 April 2012 19:30:08 Richard Yao wrote:
I am running Gentoo on ZFS using the kernel modules from sys-kernel/spl
and sys-fs/zfs. If I put swap on ZFS, the kernel appears to deadlock
when it tries to use it. I am having trouble getting a backtrace.
Does anyone have any
there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything
that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark
it a blocker of 370409).
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
once glibc-2.14 starts stabilizing, i'll be moving 2.15 into unstable
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 26 February 2012 06:34:13 Kacper Kowalik wrote:
I've been asked by a user to remove valid SRC_URI for a package that has
RESTRICT=fetch. The package in question requires you to go to
upstream's webpage, sign license agreement and then you're fed with
download link. User argues that
On Monday 02 April 2012 22:29:47 Naohiro Aota wrote:
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org writes:
Will CC cjk team then to let them know you are interested to join
(looks like there are four devs in cjk alias...)
Any updates on this?
I didn't notice him been working to return dev, I sent
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:44:05 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote:
there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything
that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and
mark it a blocker of 370409
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
bin/isolated-functions.sh |2 +-
bin/portageq |8
pym/portage/output.py |6 ++
pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py |8 ++--
4 files changed, 17
On Sunday 11 March 2012 03:09:05 Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
--- a/pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py
+++ b/pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py
-from portage.output import style_to_ansi_code
+from portage.output
follow up: have base.eclass leverage unpacker.eclass when it's available
-mike
--- base.eclass 14 Dec 2011 23:38:09 - 1.55
+++ base.eclass 5 Feb 2012 05:19:28 -
@@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ base_src_unpack() {
pushd ${WORKDIR} /dev/null
- [[ -n ${A} ]] unpack ${A}
+
please post it inline to make review easier
# @MAINTAINER: mozi...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR: Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org
goes on newline, not inlined
# @DESCRIPTION: Array containing the list of language pack xpis available
text starts on the next line, not the existing line
#
On Friday 03 February 2012 11:44:42 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
mozlinguas() {
missing eclass documentation
Is it really needed for private functions? Nothing should ever call this.
needed ? no. nice ? sure. up
On Thursday 02 February 2012 03:06:46 Michał Górny wrote:
#v+
SRC_URI=foo-bar-baz.rar
inherit unpacker
inherit goes before SRC_URI
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
here's v2
-mike
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/eutils.eclass,v 1.377 2012/01/03
08:45:36 jlec Exp $
# @ECLASS: unpacker.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# base-sys...@gentoo.org
# @BLURB:
On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of
maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list
maintainer-needed@g.o which I think should be the first step in
searching for a new maintainer.
if
any feedback before merging this initial version ?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/399019
-mike
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/eutils.eclass,v 1.377 2012/01/03
08:45:36 jlec Exp
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 19:58:32 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 28 January 2012 07:26:59 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
I've run nbench on two amd64 systems both running the same kernel
vanilla-3.2.2.
i don't think nbench is a good
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:30:16 Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:05:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
# You have to specify the off_t size ... I have no idea how to
extract that # information out of the binary executable myself.
Basically you pass in # the size of the off_t
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:51:52 Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:44:14 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
# @USAGE: [archives that we will unpack]
# @RETURN: Dependencies needed to unpack all the archives
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Walk all the specified files (defaults
601 - 700 of 3211 matches
Mail list logo
