On 01/20/11 21:55, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Unless if you are on some git repo, we have commit mails which can serve
this purpose very well.
I am on a git repo, and a commit list serves a different purpose: low
level tracking of changes.
Sebastian
On 01/20/11 22:06, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Version bumps have no place on the dev-announce list /unless/ they
impact developers' work directly.
Fine.
(and not because you want to celebrate the glory of another version release).
I'm not sure if I'm just interpreting things, but I wish you
Bumped to 2.3.0-p20100820.
Sebastian
Hello!
I have just released genkernel 3.4.11 to the testing tree.
From a high level point of view this release brings:
- Slightly faster startup
- Updated versions of busybox, LVM, e2fsprogs/blkid
- A few new features, e.g. GnuPG support
- A bunch of bug fixes (see below)
Below you can find
On 01/13/11 21:39, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
Excerpts from Sebastian Pipping's message of Thu Jan 13 17:20:00 +0100 2011:
I get errors for all of 2.02.28, 2.02.36 and 2.02.74.
I've create some draft-patch for lvm 2.02.28.
Awesome! Thank you!
Please let me know if
it's OK, and I'll
Hello!
As you may have seen in my comments on bugs [1] and [2], I need help
with getting LVM to compile from genkernel.
I get errors for all of 2.02.28, 2.02.36 and 2.02.74.
I have tried applying patches from Gentoo ebuilds, too.
Please help. These commands can get you started:
# git clone
Hello!
As of bug #342169 [1] the Tomoyo feature of Linux has not been usable
for a few month due to an outstanding bump of sys-apps/tomoyo-tools to
versio 2.3.0-p20100820. I would like to
1. Ask for work on that
by anyone skilled to do with a bit of time
proxied or not, and
On 01/11/11 20:13, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:30:03 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I've noticed at least two forums threads that suggest there might be a
bug resulting in automatic flip of system python to python3:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-859654-highlight-.html
On 01/07/11 09:49, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Besides the bump to 1.7.10... - in tree is 1.7.8-r2.
Where did you find 1.7.10? http://ftp.davidashen.net/PreTI/RNV/ does
not contain that.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rnv/
sebastian
On 01/06/11 13:17, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
app-text/rnv
Near to no maintenance work.
Besides the bump to 1.7.10... - in tree is 1.7.8-r2.
Sebastian
Hello!
I have just released genkernel 3.4.10.908 to the testing tree.
From a high level point of view this release brings:
- Unreleased patches laying around in Git (details below)
- A much more up to date man page
Below you can find details on the changes since 3.4.10.907.
Besides the people
On 11/26/10 00:17, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Zac already blogged about it almost two months ago --
http://blogs.gentoo.org/zmedico/2010/09/07/portage_2-1-9_release/
Awesome. Seems like i missed it.
Sebastian
On 12/03/10 17:24, Matthew Summers wrote:
I have started a GuideXML doc for this. You can find it in my devspace
[1]. Its really just a base bones doc at the moment, as I am no overly
fond of pomp and circumstance when writing.
Glad you are interested in helping out.
I don't find status quo
On 12/04/10 16:38, Thomas Sachau wrote:
I think, the complete python code, behaviour and eclass is way too
complicated to easily manage or
even understand it. E.g. why do we need 2 active versions by default? If i
set e.g. python-2.6 as
default, i want everything to be installed for that
Sadly, it's not done yet.
Please collect related bugs into this tracker:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347639
Sebastian
Hello,
to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use:
- a portage news entry
- notifications from within ebuilds
- a users guide counterpart of
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/Python/developersguide.xml
- mentioning in 'man make.conf'
This is overdue and has some urgency.
Are you
On 12/03/10 12:50, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 03-12-2010 11:35:14 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use:
- a portage news entry
why portage?
I'm speaking of GLEP 42. No idea if pkgcore or paludis support these.
That's why i said portage.
http
On 12/03/10 13:05, Michał Górny wrote:
The first question that comes into my mind is -- why do we need
to communicate that? I think that USE_PYTHON is a pretty specific
variable which should be used only if specially required (i.e. to keep
multiple Python versions ready for use).
What needs
On 12/03/10 13:23, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Good point. Still, as of now that's where to put USE_PYTHON.
^^^ referring to /etc/make.conf itself.
I'm unsure if that's a reason strong enough to add it.
^^^ referring to the man page of 'make.conf'.
Sebastian
On 12/03/10 14:16, Michał Górny wrote:
Then the question would be -- if that version causes so much trouble
and requires a careful re-consideration of upgrade schema, why didn't
anyone mask it yet?
I didn't dare to.
Sebastian
Hello!
Current situation
=
Without specifying USE_PYTHON in /etc/make.conf ebuilds based on the
python eclass will install packages for no more ABIs than the two active
versions on the 2.x and 3.x lines. To give an example: with Python 2.6,
2.7 and 3.1 installed and 2.7 set as
Hello!
In the mean time I have sent the attached patch to people involved with
building Gentoo stages. Before further taking action on/with that patch
I am waiting for their response.
I am now posting it here in order to let you know about this change in
status and to give potentially
On 12/01/10 05:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
As Arfrever noted, this is likely the cause of the broken automated
weekly stages for this past week. By not having a python symlink /
wrapper, stages generation failed on stage2 run.
Yes, a fellow dev already reported that issue to me.
I
Hello,
the proposed changes have been applied to all ebuilds of dev-lang/python
in Gentoo's main tree as of now.
So it's in CVS now, mirrors take longer.
If you stumble upon problems with it please
- file bugs with details
- reply here, pointing to the bug
NOTE: If you plan to explicitly
On 11/30/10 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yes, hopefully something like this will do it:
pkg_preinst() {
main_active_python=$(eselect python show)
}
pkg_postinst() {
if [[ -n $main_active_python
$main_active_python != $(eselect python show) ]] ; then
Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Pipping sebast...@pipping.org
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:52:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] dev-lang/python: Apply combined restoring (zmedico) and repair
(arfrever) of active python version
---
dev-lang/python/Manifest|2 +-
dev-lang/python
On 11/29/10 16:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
It wasn't any mistake. Please actually read that code:
eselect_python_update() {
if [[ -z $(eselect python show --python${PV%%.*}) ]]; then
eselect python update --python${PV%%.*}
fi
}
${PV%%.*} == 2
On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
There will probably be no active version of Python set.
You had two weeks to come up with this.
Please find my on IRC to team up on an agreed fix.
Sebastian
On 11/29/10 02:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Sebastian Pipping recently removed automatic upgrade of active version of
Python, so
python-2.7.1.ebuild does not upgrade active version of Python.
The ebuilds you just added for 2.7.1 and 3.1.3 do contain
eselect_python_update
On 11/29/10 10:07, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sebastian Pipping recently removed automatic upgrade of active version of
Python, so
python-2.7.1.ebuild does not upgrade active version of Python
On 11/29/10 10:30, Graham Murray wrote:
Sorry, but on one of my ~x86 systems the installation of python-2.7.1
DID update the active python version to 2.7. Worse than that, now
python-updater is running it is removing all of the
usr/lib/python-2.6/site-packages/ files and for multi-version
On 11/29/10 13:10, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
$ eselect python --help
Manage Python symlinks
Usage: eselect python action options
[...]
updateSwitch to the most recent CPython interpreter
--if-unsetDo not override existing implementation
--ignore SLOT
On 11/29/10 13:24, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/29/10 12:45 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Sorry to hear. Please put a line like
USE_PYTHON=2.6 2.7 3.1
into /etc/make.conf. It sounded like that's the versions you want.
Is that documented anywhere? I couldn't find it easily
On 11/29/10 13:42, Markos Chandras wrote:
*sigh*, Planet is not a place to inform users about these things. How
about a -dev-announce or even better a news item. Do you expect
everyone to read planet or ML? News item is such a wonderful feature. Please
please please use it.
I did not invent
On 11/29/10 16:37, Markos Chandras wrote:
Revbump otherwise get ready for a series of bug reports from frustrated
users
I don't think this case qualifies for a revbump.
The set of files produced is the same. The new revision offers nothing
new to anyone having installed the previous revision.
On 11/29/10 16:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
It wasn't any mistake. Please actually read that code:
eselect_python_update() {
if [[ -z $(eselect python show --python${PV%%.*}) ]]; then
eselect python update --python${PV%%.*}
fi
}
${PV%%.*} == 2
On 11/29/10 17:31, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
I guess it is triggered from pkg_postrm() of python-2.6.6-r1 which
until two days ago unconditionally called the following eselect
action:
eselect python update --python2
So unless you had updated your python-2.6 during the last two days,
the
On 11/29/10 18:33, Zac Medico wrote:
You could also cancel it out, by checking the state in pkg_preinst and
saving it in an environment variable so that you can restore it in
pkg_postinst.
Could you show a mockup of that?
I'm not really sure how that would work.
Would it work for pkg_postrm
On 11/28/10 19:04, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
You probably broke generation of stages :) .
(I have restored a minimal version of eselect_python_update() in python
overlay.)
Could you elaborate on that, please? How did I break stages? Which
stages? Future stage tarballs?
On 11/27/10 13:27, Lionel Orry wrote:
[Lionel] In fact you can customize the toc level with a 'toclevel'
attribute on the command-line, see the Makefile. I did several tries
but you can get the same level as the original doc with '-a
toclevels=4' if I remember well. In short, it's not a
On 11/23/10 11:43, Branko Badrljica wrote:
I figured it still beats classic interpreter.
Have you compared to optimized Python byte code, i.e. .pyo files?
Sebastian
On 11/23/10 02:46, Markos Chandras wrote:
Thank you. Like the fellow devs said before, KEYWORDS are there to
indicate whether a package works for an arch or not. Empty keywords
simply means hey, this package is not tested in this arch which is the
exact point of a live ebuild. However, p.mask
Diego,
On 11/21/10 15:29, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
The reason why many of them are in p.mask is usually because _I_ added
them there as they didn't mask with KEYWORDS=, and simply dropping
keywords would have users angry.
Why does KEYWORDS= on live ebuilds make users angry?
Where can I
On 11/21/10 08:47, Ryan Hill wrote:
toolchain revbumps are expensive
How expansive? More than a rebuild of GCC itself?
Best,
Sebastian
On 11/21/10 17:27, Markos Chandras wrote:
Where can I find the rest of this thread?
Ehh, maybe on gentoo archives?
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_4934999b1188cf3ecc53fea784054afb.xml
Is that what you are asking for?
In a way, yes, thanks. Should have thought of looking there. I
On 11/21/10 20:30, Ryan Hill wrote:
Actually not. Users are already familiar with the - concept so there
is no point to add extra obstacles in their way. I am trying to find out
corner cases where double masking makes sense. Otherwise it makes no
sense to me. Actually the majority of users
On 11/14/10 22:42, Florian Philipp wrote:
Is there a chance to do the same for perl and perl-cleaner?
I understand perl is not slotted at the moment and there are probably
good technical reasons for not doing so but I still wanted to ask. :)
I'm not sure if the Perl team is watching this
Hello,
thanks for your interest. This thread is not about Python 3.x in
particular, in case you wonder.
In this mail
- Typical GCC update (for comparison)
- Python 2.7 update simulation (and how it fails)
- The scenario
- What happens
- How it happens
- Conclusion
Hey there,
like etc-update and dispatch-conf _conf-update_ seems to be one of the
more central tools in Gentoo.
I have the impression that it is unmaintained because...
- metadata.xml says maintainer-needed, and
- upstream seems to be a single _retired_ Gentoo dev, only.
There is lots of
Hello!
I assume this Makefile to work with any non-GNU make:
CFLAGS=`sdl-config --cflags` -Wall -Wextra
LDFLAGS=`sdl-config --libs`
OBJ=tron.o pixel.o
.PHONY: clean run
tron: $(OBJ)
run: tron
./tron
clean:
rm -f *.o tron
Now how would we fix this to respect
I like that one better.
Both proposals leave a question open to me, though:
Do I understand correctly that I could integrate the in-profile value with
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} foo bar
in /etc/make.conf? Maybe that's something people want to do. If so
maybe add a hint?
Sebastian
On 07/21/10 15:49, Nathan Eloe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello portage developers
My name is Nathan Eloe, and I'm working on a Google Summer of Code
project in which I'm writing a library that will create an Abstract
Syntax Tree of the bash grammar. In essence I am
On 07/21/10 16:56, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
A few things I haven't seen, yet:
# Adjacent changes in quotation
echo abc''def # Makes abcdef
# Escape sequences like ..
echo abc\def
# Invocation from ibnside strings
echo foo $(echo foo), bar `echo bar`
# Heredocs (and their variations ..)
cat
Enrico,
thanks for sharing your changes with us.
I had a look at the diff as I was curious.
While I may lacking understanding that the zlib maintainers in Gentoo do
have, your changes look self-explaining to me.
Maybe you could comment on the diff and explain your changes.
Best,
Sebastian
On 07/06/10 19:07, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Enrico,
thanks for sharing your changes with us.
I had a look at the diff as I was curious.
While I may lacking understanding that the zlib maintainers in Gentoo do
have, your changes look self-explaining to me.
^ do
From: Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org
To: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
beide 404, aber
Arun,
On 07/02/10 16:23, Arun Raghavan wrote:
The problem is not noise. The problem is that an issue that needs to
be escalated to Devrel could not be resolved by the involved
developers or the people who were present at the time. Moreover, there
are strong emotions from the devs (and often
Hello Jorge,
I stumbled upon this in the section on community related beliefs of yours:
[T]he Gentoo community is made of its members and they are what they
are. We have a mostly technical adult male community, including a
few people with rough or challenging social skills.
How do you
Arun,
On 06/22/10 07:13, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On reading again, you do have suggestions on how you would deal with
most of what you've spoken. The only one that I think could use more
details (other than all the references to tone which I think we
should let rest for a while) is Opening up
Arfrever,
On 06/28/10 22:26, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Is there any reason you are so non-verbose here? 'cvs log' or '$EDITOR
ChangeLog' equally give us no information about your commit. You are
making it hard on other devs in my opinion, I don't think intentionally,
but
Hello!
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
Thanks for your vote!
Best,
Sebastian
Petteri,
On 06/21/10 20:20, Petteri Räty wrote:
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
- Building sites
- Active Council
- More direct democracy
- New conflict resolution team (reforming DevRel)
- Ownership and territories
-
Arun,
On 06/21/10 21:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
My manifesto up here now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~sping/council-manifesto-2010-sping.txt
For all your points where you do not have a concrete proposal of how
you intend to tackle the problem, could you please elaborate?
please take your time to
On 06/22/10 03:46, Brian Harring wrote:
Your proposed solutions in your manifesto is to just throw out the
manifest bits that need completion, in the process ignoring the
infrastructural and security reasons for their existance. Same goes
for ignoring the commit hooks chunk for rsync
Jorge,
On 06/19/10 05:20, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
you're confusing talk and jokes between developers on a particular
private room with tone between members of the global community in public
mediums.
It wasn't #gentoo-roughshit, it was in #gentoo-infra - the place devs go
on infra
Nirbheek,
On 06/19/10 17:34, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
No, really, flaming #gentoo-infra on the gentoo-dev mailing list is
silly, useless *and* ironic (in this case).
It's not about the infra team, it's about communication in the
#gentoo-infra channel. All of silly, useless *and* ironic could
Jeremy,
On 06/19/10 06:45, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 06/18/2010 09:25 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
In #gentoo-infra snip
#gentoo-infra is a private channel and you don't have to be in there. No
public community members/users are in there. The tone can be anything
that is acceptable
On 06/19/10 08:43, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Now that's tone in Gentoo. Brilliant.
And you're ugly!
Hey, you're doing it yourself. You're using sarcasm (I assume you do,
otherwise the positive Brilliant. doesn't fit in the context of Oh
dear, these rude people said that!)
You got me.
Brian,
On 06/19/10 11:37, Brian Harring wrote:
and you do not go into someone's home and tell them
what they can/cannot say.
right. #gentoo-infra is not anybody's home though: it's an infra-matter
channel of Gentoo.
If you like to view it as anybody's home it's home of Gentoo and
therefore
On 06/19/10 19:50, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
If #gentoo-infra bangs their moms the rest of the community deserves to
know.
Oh? What do you do at night with your girlfriend (or boyfriend or yourself)?
The community deserves to know!
My point was about the style of communication in there, not
On 06/19/10 19:59, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
This is a point that deserves more consideration. One of the top
reasons (as witnessed in forum discussions)
Unfortunately, that's selecting a rather biased audience. The success
of a forum depends upon the number of active posters it has. The number
Ciaran,
On 06/19/10 21:16, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
No, that's the nice thing about delivering a product based upon
technical merit: most of the time, there are right answers and there
are wrong answers, and careful investigation and good management can
lead to it being determined which is
Hello.
As some people seem to be interested in examples of out of the line tone
in Gentoo I feel like sharing an example just happened a few minutes ago:
In #gentoo-infra people are talking about banging each others moms
right now. I was told this is normal in there. As I mentioned it's
On 06/18/10 05:43, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Hmm - thats interesting, I subconsciously read the two questions into
the one posted. I accept you point. Its something I am likely to
write myself without thinking about it too much too.
Oh, this is a good one. Without introducing the problem, it
On 06/17/10 05:24, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Well, apart from explaining technical stuff[1] as in the example above,
we could obviously explain how our developers work, how much most of
them get payed for doing that, inform users of our services what they
can and cannot expect to get.
It sounds a
Hello!
I would like to nominate phajdan.jr (Pawel Hajdan, Jr.).
Sebastian
Ciaran,
the mindset I hear in your mail sounds a lot more like (my understanding
of) Exherbo than Gentoo.
I would appreciate if you stayed on topic which is improving tone in
Gentoo. Thanks.
Best,
Sebastian
Jorge,
On 06/17/10 02:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
1) Make the list of subscribers to the devrel alias public
I don't know what gave you the idea that the list of the Developer
Relations project members is private.
You can check the alias members directly by running grep devrel
Petteri,
On 06/17/10 09:52, Petteri Räty wrote:
Wrong mailing list. This thread belongs to gentoo-project.
that's what I am referring to with tone in Gentoo.
I want the other 80% of you on the council.
In my opinion the DevRel topic is too important to hide it on a mailing
list with a
Duncan,
On 06/17/10 09:56, Duncan wrote:
DevRel is
understaffed. I've seen observations to the effect that most developers
aren't interested in getting involved in that area, particularly in
reference to the conflict resolution subgroup
when I offered to join DevRel last time in reply
Patrick,
On 06/17/10 18:21, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Now of course this will cause friction. I've noticed it especially with
germanic and slavic languages that are more terse than english.
For example Sit down! is acceptable in all situations in german,
maybe acceptable, sure not polite or
Petteri,
On 06/17/10 17:45, Petteri Räty wrote:
We communicate in English but that doesn't mean we all the same cultural
background. My native language doesn't do small talk and doesn't have a
word for please. Of course when writing English I try use please when
required by the other party
On 06/17/10 16:37, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
I don't know what gave you the idea that the list of the Developer
Relations project members is private.
Also, Willinks reports the alias to be empty, unlike with other aliases:
[00:44] sping expn devrel
[00:44] willikins devrel =
A question
On 06/16/10 07:43, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
That's a conclusion first, then a premise?
Tone is not a strength of Gentoo is my own obserservation.
Please be more verbose - I fail to understand the core of your question.
- How come tone is so rough when we actually meant to be
a friendly
Roy,
On 06/16/10 21:40, Roy Bamford wrote:
As a native English speaker (from England) I view Jers reply as terse
and to the point, completely lacking in tone.
interesting. Looking at the sentence
When did you point this out to devrel?
I would like to say that while it's not impolite per
Angelo,
On 06/16/10 19:07, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
I've seen some bugs [sorry no references right now] where some
developers point out facts in a *very* aggressive way.
bug replies, yes! I remember replies like
you obviously have no clue how xzz works
from developer to developer on a bug
Pawel,
On 06/16/10 18:39, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I have searched a few places for rules on tone,
I believe one can't solve this problem by using rules.
any ideas what could help?
We need leadership. I remember very well when the leader of one of the
Gentoo projects I participate in
Nikos,
thanks for speaking up on this matter.
I encourage more Gentoo users to make them heard with this.
Best,
Sebastian
Hello!
yngwin's devaway message still reads
inactive, pending resolution of devrel issue.
yngwin retired. I woudn't go as far as saying that his case made him
retire but I definitely say that _DevRel failed on his case_.
I believe I had enough insight to be able to say.
I would like to
Jeroen,
On 06/16/10 21:31, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) that there are probably some good examples of the bad tone that sping
referred to, perhaps in the devrel/userrel domain and therefore not
initially public, and that unless those projects fail (to uphold the
CoC), we should probably not be
Jorge,
On 06/17/10 02:01, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
There was a mostly silent agreement between some teams, including
DevRel, UserRel, Council and Trustees, that after the Proctors project
was terminated, the enforcement of the CoC, including any moderation or
banning actions, would
Jorge,
On 06/17/10 02:14, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Sebastian, I understand your concern, but as Alec puts it, we have gone
a long way since the 2007-2008 low regarding this type of behaviour.
I'm not advocating that communication in Gentoo mediums has become
perfect, but I don't see
Hello!
Tone is currently not a strength of Gentoo.
As I have heard there are people not joining Gentoo because the
atmosphere in Gentoo is lacking respect and empathy.
I have searched a few places for rules on tone, looking at the Gentoo
Social Contract [1], the Code of Conduct [2] and the
Hello!
When you are active in Gentoo during one week and less active during the
next it may happen that people (sometimes jokingly) call you a
slacker. This pattern seems to have become common enough that people
even started calling themselves slackers when they are less active than
potentially
On 06/13/10 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
If we want to find a way to not drop the maintainer-needed packages, I'd
prefer we move them to sunset and not to sunrise.
Agreed.
If there is a user-maintainer move to sunrise, if there isn't move to
sunset.
As this overlay is
likely to
Thomas, Arfrever,
the way this discussion currently works does not look fruitful to me.
Questions I would like to raise:
- How come you don't agree on facts?
- Is this about processes or results?
- Have you tried to understand the other side's problem?
- Could you try a
On 06/05/10 16:36, Alex Legler wrote:
Chainsaw, Fauli and sping please.
Thanks. I accept nomination.
Sebastian
Thomas,
On 06/06/10 01:04, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Every slot and every version *should* satisfy a dev-lang/python dependency,
but currently such
unspecified version dependency does automaticly pull in the latest
version/slot, which in case of
python does mean python-3*, even when you have
Thomas,
On 06/06/10 04:01, Thomas Sachau wrote:
[..] so even if it is not pulled in during installation, it will be pulled in
during world update.
sounds right. Preventing this requires either masking or a
dont-pull-uninstalled-slots switch for portage (which I am not
suggesting), right?
Tobias,
On 06/04/10 05:53, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
I wasn't able to attend that meeting, as i noticed it just a day or
two before. From then on ... I heard just nothing wrt the Wiki
project.
Have you contacted people who took part in the meeting asking for
details and results?
Sebastian
101 - 200 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
