Re: [gentoo-dev] Why gcc-config is a separate utility, not a module for eselect?

2015-03-02 Thread viv...@gmail.com
good memory, maybe someone could write a frontend in eselect to gcc-config, to have a proved manager _and_ everything in one place. Il 28/02/2015 13:41, malc ha scritto: Read these :) There was an attempt, many years ago when I was still a Dev, but it never quite worked as intended and ended up

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 04/02/2015 10:24, Ben de Groot ha scritto: From an upstream that I care about: https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/FFmpeg-versus-Libav Based on that I would say we should switch back the default to ffmpeg. on that page I see a information about why gentoo should stick with libav,

Re: [gentoo-dev] toolchain.eclass: need to revert fixincludes commit

2015-02-02 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 02/02/2015 23:30, Pacho Ramos ha scritto: El sáb, 31-01-2015 a las 16:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió: Hi everyone, We need to revert the following change to toolchain.eclass: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/toolchain.eclass?r1=1.647r2=1.648 It turns

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Review: news item and script for CPU_FLAGS_X86

2015-01-26 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/01/2015 00:12, Michał Górny ha scritto: $ emerge -1v app-portage/cpuinfo2cpuflags $ cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86.py it's cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 w/o the .py here

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving CPU flags into USE_EXPAND

2015-01-15 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 15/01/2015 11:30, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 + (UTC) Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote: Christopher Head ch...@chead.ca wrote: All that requires is knowing the names, though; it would be fine if no package actually uses the feature yet. ++ More

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/12/2014 09:13, Zac Medico ha scritto: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use flag combinations and the rest? The current approach is to store the data in an xpak segment that is appended to the end of the tbz2 file.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/12/2014 17:07, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 12/24/2014 04:01 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Il 24/12/2014 09:13, Zac Medico ha scritto: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use flag combinations and the rest? The current

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-10 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 09/12/2014 15:26, Martin Vaeth ha scritto: viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote: - The project only has 20 commit, last one 8 months ago https://github.com/m-click/mcpdf.git The project is just a few lines anyway: merely a wrapper to the library. All the work happens in the itext

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support @profile package set for bug #532224

2014-12-10 Thread viv...@gmail.com
just a typo: confgured BTW could this be used to shrink the @system set, and remove stuff like mandb for example? cheers, Francesco R.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 08/12/2014 00:17, Martin Vaeth ha scritto: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Have you tried mcpdf? I heard about it now for the first time. If I understand correctly, it uses the same library as pdfTK, only a somewhat later version (e.g. with improved unicode handling). The main

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 08/12/2014 01:05, Gordon Pettey ha scritto: On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Kristian Fiskers By all means, thanks for informing about an alternative, but I personally believe that it is important for the overall distribution to keep a wider perspective than personal non-free

[gentoo-dev] overlays.g.o status

2014-12-01 Thread viv...@gmail.com
hi, what's the status of o.g.o? May I offer an lxc container? Regards, Francesco Riosa http://infra-status.gentoo.org/ The CVS and Git Overlays services have been successfully migrated to the new hosts. Please note the following: Gitweb as well as the http://overlays.gentoo.org/ and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-19 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 20/11/2014 00:58, Rich Freeman ha scritto: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/19/2014 06:27 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, hasufell wrote: In the end, I'm not sure if this is actually such a big problem. You can still use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-19 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 20/11/2014 01:00, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto: On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:54:05 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: At that point it is forked. I don't see what's wrong with forking. Forking wouldn't be the problem. Duplication of effort would be the problem. jer worse, mutually

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-18 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 18/11/2014 14:12, Jauhien Piatlicki ha scritto: On 11/18/2014 04:19 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org writes: It would be probably good to have in the tree only the core components and move other stuff to the thematic overlays. Then we can have a clear

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm

2014-11-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 07/11/2014 20:08, hasufell ha scritto: Also, I don't understand these discussions. The time dependency resolving takes is marginal compared to the whole update process, no matter what PM you use. The time dependency resolving takes is marginal compared to the whole update process ^^^ this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm

2014-11-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 08/11/2014 14:35, Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 09:29:52 +0100 viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote: The time dependency resolving takes is marginal compared to the whole update process ^^^ this is an utter lie for frequent updates Uh, how long are your resolves

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-12 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Hi, have you considered to stabilize gcc:4.9 instead possibly 4.9.2 ? I'm not really suggesting to do so, but seem that most of the problems of 4.9.1 are the same of 4.8.3 so maybe it's worth considering. Il 11/10/2014 13:57, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. ha scritto: In my earlier thread

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add bc back to the stage3

2014-09-17 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 17/09/2014 14:09, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto: On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Luca Barbato wrote: The bc utility is part of the posix tools and it might be used to build linux among the other stuff. Luca, bc is not in the system set and is a dependency of the kernel or any other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

2014-09-16 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 16/09/2014 20:02, Duncan ha scritto: Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:55:31 -0400 as excerpted: Or they could just clone the git tree, and they can look at per-file logs anytime they want to. Give me ro access to a current git repo and I'll *VERY* happily leave changelogs to

Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

2014-09-14 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 14/09/2014 14:03, Michał Górny ha scritto: The rsync tree -- We'd also propagate things to rsync. We'd have to populate it with old ChangeLogs, new ChangeLog entries (autogenerated from git) and thick Manifests. So users won't notice much of a change. If this will change all

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using .xz for doc/man/info compression

2014-05-14 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 05/13/14 13:01, Andrew Savchenko wrote: f we are trying to consider a majority of users (and thus to select reasonable defaults), from disk usage + decompression overhead point of view it will be the best to store compressed files if they are at least one filesystem block smaller than

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Hosting daily gx86 squashfs images and deltas

2014-01-27 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 01/27/14 08:35, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 21:00 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: Hi again. If someone is interested in the results of my tests and benchmarks, I've uploaded the initial version of my article on the topic in our dev-space.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Hosting daily gx86 squashfs images and deltas

2014-01-17 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 01/17/14 17:27, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, all. I'm using squashfs to hold my Gentoo repositories on all of my systems for some time. As you probably know, this allows me to save space while keeping portage fast. However, it makes updating the tree quite burdensome and time-consuming. Me

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2013-12-26 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 12/26/13 14:27, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: That is funny that you mention cleaning up. I remember last time when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted your outdated repoman warning to be correct. You didn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in libraries?

2013-12-19 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 12/19/13 16:17, Jan Kundrát wrote: On Thursday, 19 December 2013 10:18:55 CEST, Michał Górny wrote: Would it be possible to have a consistent ABI for both C++03 and C++11? The simpler changes like adding new fields can be backported quite easily (even if it would mean having dummy fields in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-10 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 08/09/13 15:54, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-08-09, o godz. 14:14:12 viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com napisał(a): On 08/09/13 13:38, Pacho Ramos wrote: El vie, 09-08-2013 a las 19:39 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: On 08/09/2013 07:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-09 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 08/09/13 13:38, Pacho Ramos wrote: El vie, 09-08-2013 a las 19:39 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: On 08/09/2013 07:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: You just removed the upgrade path for users. The upgrade path is to

Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet

2013-08-05 Thread viv...@gmail.com
[snip] :p I'm actually thinking netrc if Robin is ok with it. William replaying to a random message in the tree Not going to suggest a name but if has to be something for general consumption, it should avoid the gentoo inside the name just my 0.2¢

Re: [gentoo-dev] s/disk space/drive space

2013-07-30 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 07/30/13 15:03, Alexander Berntsen wrote: On 30/07/13 14:55, Douglas Freed wrote: How is it wrong? I don't have a disk so informing me that I don't have enough disk space does not make any sense.. I think my suggestion and its justification has been made clear, so I will not proceed to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-18 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 06/18/13 09:06, Duncan wrote: What on earth is a teoric fallacy? My question too. Wictionary and google both appear to agree, however, that while teoric isn't English, it's Catalan (or Aranese/Occitan, the area is NE Spain into south France) for theoretical, which it /is/ close enough

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-17 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 06/15/13 19:02, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have implemented a certain behavior,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2013-06-17 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 06/16/13 11:49, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: app-arch/tarsync * app-arch/tarsync Available versions: (~)0.2.1 (~)0.2.1-r1 Homepage:http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/tarsync/ Description: Delta

[gentoo-dev] RFC how to handle disappearing USE in (portage) dependency calculation

2013-06-07 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Hi everybody, sometimes a package depend from another with a particular USE flag turned on, example llvm-3.2 on dev-libs/udis86 +pic Sometimes a new ebuild can change IUSE, indeed udis86-1.7-r1 removed pic use which was present in 1.7-r0. This RFC is to understend what we (you actually) want

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC how to handle disappearing USE in (portage) dependency calculation

2013-06-07 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 06/07/13 14:37, Sergey Popov wrote: 07.06.2013 15:26, viv...@gmail.com пишет: Hi everybody, sometimes a package depend from another with a particular USE flag turned on, example llvm-3.2 on dev-libs/udis86 +pic Sometimes a new ebuild can change IUSE, indeed udis86-1.7-r1 removed pic use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Draft news item: MySQL/MariaDB packages dropping support for PrimeBase (PBXT) engine

2013-06-02 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 06/01/13 02:37, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi all, See attached the draft news item for MySQL/MariaDB dropping PBXT support. from the draft: All users who have data stored in PBXT-backed tables should convert the tables to another format before upgrading to MySQL/MariaDB 5.5, as the tables

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe?

2013-06-02 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 06/02/13 13:54, Duncan wrote: viv...@gmail.com posted on Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:14:41 +0200 as excerpted: While portage can be safe, for various reason (including the resultant pkg) I do prefer to do the move in post_src_install() #1 All my tests have been done against a manually converted

Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs

2013-05-22 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 05/21/13 23:38, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, 15:38:44 schrieb Thomas Sachau: And if a maintainer is not responding within 30 days, you can ping him or, without a response, try to get a different maintainer. Just assuming that a stable request is ok without a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

2013-05-22 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 05/22/13 11:43, Michael Palimaka wrote: On 22/05/2013 19:22, viv...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/21/13 23:38, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, 15:38:44 schrieb Thomas Sachau: And if a maintainer is not responding within 30 days, you can ping him or, without a response, try

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

2013-05-22 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 05/22/13 13:06, Michael Palimaka wrote: On 22/05/2013 20:41, Thomas Sachau wrote: Michael Palimaka schrieb: On 22/05/2013 20:07, viv...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/22/13 11:43, Michael Palimaka wrote: On 22/05/2013 19:22, viv...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/21/13 23:38, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CPU use flag detection

2013-05-19 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 05/19/13 17:47, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: [...] ...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc? all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many packages use them: we already

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND is not an IUSE replacement [was: New USE_EXPAND: CLAWS_MAIL_PLUGINS]

2013-05-04 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 04/05/2013 08:11, Dustin C. Hatch ha scritto: On 5/3/2013 16:08, René Neumann wrote: Am 03.05.2013 22:20, schrieb Zac Medico: Is it worth changing? Nope. What's worth changing is the excessive use of USE_EXPAND for no reason (your described usecase makes sense for reasonable USE_EXPAND

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/id3lib: metadata.xml ChangeLog id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild

2013-05-04 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 04/05/2013 19:42, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto: On Fri, 03 May 2013 20:18:42 +0200 Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: + 03 May 2013; Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org +id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild, + metadata.xml: + Fix obsolete macros to work with automake-1.13, #467704; bumped to EAPI=5 and +

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC

2013-04-25 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 04/24/13 21:17, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:16:06 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: This means when you emerge or upgrade to openrc-0.12, the net.* scripts will no longer be included. I am going to

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: libpng16 won't be able to show some broken icons libpng15 was still able to

2013-04-23 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 04/22/13 13:03, Tobias Klausmann wrote: Hi! Since we probably will have to fix the files coming out of tarballs until the various upstreams have fixed them, I propose running a PNG fixer during or after the install phase. Since having pngcrush as dep for everything is not exactly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/01/2013 20:21, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto: On 01/24/13 13:58, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: How about, you know what you're doing and are going to build a new kernel as soon as the emerge finishes (since the emerge is also bringing in a new gentoo-sources)?? If you're going to upgrade both

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/01/2013 21:45, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto: On 01/24/13 15:39, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 01/24/13 15:26, viv...@gmail.com wrote: If you're going to upgrade both anyway, you should be upgrading the kernel first. That way if you lose power or the system crashes, the box can reboot

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-22 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 22/01/2013 04:38, Robin H. Johnson ha scritto: I'm raising this patch because of the recent spate of bugs with the latest udev that now fails to boot your system if CONFIG_DEVTMPFS is not available in your kernel. Bugs: 408947, 409393, 437320, 453074 CONFIG_CHECK has not been fatal for

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-18 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 09/01/2013 23:13, William Hubbs ha scritto: All, as you probably know by now, udev-197 has hit the tree. This new version implements a new feature called predictable network interface names [1], which I have currently turned off for live systems, because it will require migration on the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new qt category

2013-01-17 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 17/01/2013 14:57, Ben de Groot ha scritto: Hi guys, Presently we already have a good number of split qt-* library packages in x11-libs. With the arrival of Qt5 upstream has gone a lot further in modularization, so we expect the number of packages to grow much more. We, the Gentoo Qt team,

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 16/01/2013 17:25, Mike Gilbert ha scritto: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi! On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Greg KH wrote: So anyone who relies on network names right now to be deterministic, and you have more than one network device in your system,

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 07/01/2013 17:13, Richard Yao ha scritto: On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go ?!, so if anyone knows of any issues please let us know. We probably should not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories?

2012-12-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/12/2012 10:11, Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 03:17:06 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: On 20.12.2012 19:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: The tree is a database. It belongs in /var/db/. yes and no, yes it contain data and executable needed to update gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-18 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 17/12/2012 11:11, Tomáš Chvátal ha scritto: Hi lads, lately I am having bit of problems from getting relevant debug info from users. Since we already have splitdebug for quite time (and I suppose quite few of us are using it) how about making it to default profiles default enabled and add -g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 17/12/2012 11:42, Diego Elio Pettenò ha scritto: On 17/12/2012 11:33, Sven Eden wrote: on my system I have set up everything with splitdebug enabled. My CFLAGS use - march=native, -O2 and -ggdb. That's -ggdb that increases the size. In short FEATURES=compressdebug should be stable and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/profiler

2012-11-28 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 28/11/2012 00:04, Sebastian Pipping ha scritto: # Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org (27 Nov 2012) # Masked for removal in 30 days. # Licensing issues, turned out not distributable (bug #444332) app-admin/profiler uhm, maybe for licensing issues the grace period of 30 days could be

Re: [gentoo-dev] About DESCRIPTION in ebuilds needing to end with a dot .

2012-10-19 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 19/10/2012 21:36, Thomas Sachau ha scritto: Pacho Ramos schrieb: Hello At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ., would you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman warning? Thanks for your opinions I dont know any such requirement from

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal

2012-09-18 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 18/09/2012 11:38, Ulrich Mueller ha scritto: Which is longer than the original.;-) Ulrich RDEPEND==sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4 =app-arch/bzip2-1.0.2 app-arch/xz-utils DEPEND=${RDEPEND} virtual/pkgconfig DEPENDENCIES==sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4 =app-arch/bzip2-1.0.2 app-arch/xz-utils

Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5?

2012-09-12 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 11/09/2012 18:43, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 09/11/2012 09:36 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Dunno where to place this request, but if we go for something like EJOBS could we also make it phase specific? So compile, install and test could have a different number of jobs running. Possibly three

Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5?

2012-09-11 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 04/09/2012 19:15, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 09/04/2012 04:00 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 05:20:02PM -0700, Brian Harring wrote This approach is fine imo, although I'd *potentially* look at adding a magic $PROC_COUNT var that is the # of cpu threads on the system; either

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Questions about SystemD and OpenRC

2012-08-12 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 12/08/2012 11:43, Duncan ha scritto: Peter Stuge posted on Sun, 12 Aug 2012 02:12:38 +0200 as excerpted: viv...@gmail.com wrote: First problem udev/SD has is that it can't see all the file system labels, for some reason it only see sda and sdb so it's able to partly proceed in the boot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Questions about SystemD and OpenRC

2012-08-12 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 12/08/2012 14:25, Rich Freeman ha scritto: On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Peter Stuge posted on Sun, 12 Aug 2012 02:12:38 +0200 as excerpted: What software parses the filesystem labels when you boot with openrc? (I ask because I never use labels

Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions about SystemD and OpenRC

2012-08-12 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 12/08/2012 09:44, Michał Górny ha scritto: On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:29:43 +0200 viv...@gmail.comviv...@gmail.com wrote: 2. I saw on some lists that Gnome/Kde and Xfce plan to use some SystemD API, so does it means that we will need to install SystemD aside of OpenRC ? It's not possible at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions about SystemD and OpenRC

2012-08-11 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 07/08/2012 14:47, Sylvain Alain ha scritto: Hi everyone, for a couple of months now, I see on the list some of activities about OpenRC been ported to FreeBSD or OpenRC to Debian and other stuff related to SystemD. I have some basic questions about all that : 1. The SystemD and Udev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in dev-perl/XML-Parser: XML-Parser-2.410.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-08-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 07/08/2012 18:26, Fabian Groffen ha scritto: On 07-08-2012 18:03:14 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: * Fabian Groffen (grobian)grob...@gentoo.org: grobian 12/08/07 15:21:54 Modified: ChangeLog Added:XML-Parser-2.410.0-r1.ebuild Log: Fix expat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage FEATURE suggestion - limited-visibility builds

2012-07-31 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 31/07/2012 21:27, Michał Górny ha scritto: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:16:34 -0400 Rich Freemanri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Stakenviciusa...@gentoo.org wrote: Although that is true, it would be -WAY- too slow to generate said list via equery/q* helpers; I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev

2012-07-12 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 11/07/2012 22:33, Mike Gilbert ha scritto: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:54 PM, William Hubbswilli...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:27:41PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: Just to put a number to this, there are currently 126 packages in the tree with a dependency on sys-fs/udev.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel compiles and you

2012-07-05 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 05/07/2012 10:27, Tobias Klausmann ha scritto: I vaguely remembered the rm-rf bug, but I was unable to find any reference to it (at least not easily), do you happen to have a pointer? Regards, Tobias neither I, but look at this bug for an example

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES=userpriv usersandbox by default?

2012-07-03 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 02/07/2012 22:45, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 07/02/2012 01:36 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Il 02/07/2012 22:01, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 07/02/2012 12:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 28-05-2012 a las 14:34 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: Hi, In case you aren't familiar with FEATURES

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES=userpriv usersandbox by default?

2012-07-02 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 02/07/2012 22:01, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 07/02/2012 12:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 28-05-2012 a las 14:34 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: Hi, In case you aren't familiar with FEATURES=userpriv, here's the description from the make.conf(5) man page: Allow portage to drop root

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] gcc-native-flags() proposal addition to toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-06-20 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Meeting with bug: #409471 suggested that some ebuilds could benefit from expanding -march=native to the actual flags the compiler use. Cannot suggest where to use it at the moment, but implementation was simple enough and possibly someone on this list could have a use for it. # @FUNCTION:

Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 release candidate

2012-06-06 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 06/06/2012 21:40, Gregory M. Turner ha scritto: - Original Message - i'm pleased to announce the initial x32 release candidate: http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/stage3-amd64-x32-20120605.tar.xz Also pleased to hear this! Thanks! Can't wait to find the time to play with it. Did

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: iotop needs to run as root after kernel change

2012-04-04 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 04/04/2012 08:43, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. ha scritto: On 4/4/12 8:32 AM, justin wrote: 1. Leave it to root (Fedora and Suses way) I think that's the best option, at least for now. 2. suid it (bad in my view) Agreed, that'd be very bad, any crashing bug in it could become a privilege escalation

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-27 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 27/03/2012 20:53, Ian Stakenvicius ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to decide on *before*