Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:34:14 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Alexis Ballier > wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:00:16 -0500 > > "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote: > > > >> However, what alternative do we have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

Hi, mysql project is using https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/mysql-extras.git/ (i.e. an own repository) to track patches. What I like about it: 1) We track patches/changes due to using a VCS. 2) We can fetch directly from gitweb.gentoo.org, i.e. no need to adjust SRC_URI when changing a patch.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:00:16 -0500 > "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote: > >> However, what alternative do we have to throwing the patches up in a >> devspace? > > mirror://gentoo, aka

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:00:16 -0500 "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote: > On 2017-12-17 14:21, Michał Górny wrote: > > Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be > > larger than 32 KiB. If the package needs more auxiliary files, they > > should be put into

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On 2017-12-19 21:44, R0b0t1 wrote: > How easy is it to move patches to Gentoo infrastructure if the patches > are not provided by upstream? I am slightly uncomfortable with > everything being pushed to websites like GitHub by default. Don't get me wrong but this a *dev* mailing list. Your

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 3:44:26 PM EST R0b0t1 wrote: > How easy is it to move patches to Gentoo infrastructure if the patches > are not provided by upstream? I am slightly uncomfortable with > everything being pushed to websites like GitHub by default. How are patches different from other

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

And it would be nice to also recall the overlays, which can also use repoman (and/or mgorny's travis hook for that), but at the same time have no possibility to self-host the patches... // well, I personally would prefer that repoman had an option to "ignore" some (specified as an argument)

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hello, everyone. >> >> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has >> accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: >> >> Total size of 'files'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017, at 07:21 CST, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has > accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: > > Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > On 12/18/17 14:01, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> Whether we remove all files/ or the entire package dir from the repo, >> I'd suggest that this become more standardized if we wanted to go down >> one of these roads.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On 12/18/17 14:01, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> It would be interesting instead to evaluate ways to remove _all_ files/ dirs >> from the tree, keeping ebuilds separated from data. > Arguably you could go a step further and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > It would be interesting instead to evaluate ways to remove _all_ files/ dirs > from the tree, keeping ebuilds separated from data. Arguably you could go a step further and not distribute even the ebuilds except on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On 12/17/17 14:21, Michał Górny wrote: > ... > Rationale > = > > At this moment, syncing the repository implies fetching 'files' > directories of all packages, even though the relevant files are used > only when a ebuild referencing them is being built. This means that our > users fetch

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

W dniu nie, 17.12.2017 o godzinie 13∶39 -0500, użytkownik Mike Gilbert napisał: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has > > accepted a new policy. The accepted

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> It is a policy, not an absolute rule. > What's the difference? Is QA not going to enforce the policy? It is described here: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Policies#General_Notes The QA team can grant an exception if for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> I just want to voice my opinion on this: as a developer, this policy >> is a royal pain in the ass. > >> I would ask the council to please increase this limit to at least

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I just want to voice my opinion on this: as a developer, this policy > is a royal pain in the ass. > I would ask the council to please increase this limit to at least > 100 KiB, preferably more. It is a policy, not an absolute rule. Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:23:21 +0100 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Am Sonntag, 17. Dezember 2017, 14:21:10 CET schrieb Michał Górny: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has > > accepted a new policy. The accepted

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On 17/12/17 20:35, Lars Wendler wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Gilbert >> wrote: >>> I just want to voice my opinion on this: as a developer, this >>> policy is a royal pain in the ass. >>> >>> I would ask the council to please increase this limit to at >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

Am Sun, 17 Dec 2017 13:40:35 -0500 schrieb Mike Gilbert : > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Gilbert > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny > > wrote: > >> Hello, everyone. > >> > >> It's my pleasure to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

Am Sonntag, 17. Dezember 2017, 14:21:10 CET schrieb Michał Górny: > Hello, everyone. > > It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has > accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: > > Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger > than 32

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hello, everyone. >> >> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has >> accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has > accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: > > Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger >

[gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

Hello, everyone. It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger than 32 KiB. If the package needs more auxiliary files, they should be put into