On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 11:24 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric
kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 17:24:49
Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 2013-09-28, at 9:43 AM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 17:24:49
Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com
Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2013, 20:11:04 schrieb Kent Fredric:
On 27 September 2013 05:57, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.comwrote:
virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted.
How would you recommend it?
How about doing someting eclass-based, similar to add_kdebase_dep, and let
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more of poppler-like issues to occur.
Well, the best technical solution for this is probably subslot dictionaries
as suggested in bug 462138. Then,
Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 17:24:49
Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm
tl;dr: We should use EAPI5 features
I've noticed some libraries (e.g. poppler) having (almost) all their
consumers migrated to eapi5 subslots.
So upgrading those is now really neato.
Other libraries are still a bit less optimal. So there's lots of
revdep-rebuild / emerge @preserved-rebuild
Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 15:15:38
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Thus I suggest declaring a policy:
Any library bump that would trigger revdep-rebuild should be done with
the affected library package.mask'ed until all its consumers have been
properly bumped to subslot-aware
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more of poppler-like issues to occur.
Can you give a an example package which:
-
Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2013, 16:04:22 schrieb Kent Fredric:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more of
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid
forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only
cause more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/09/13 11:24 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric
kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
How do we handle packages which install multiple
please, not this again...
please spend your time on something useful:
fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think better
for fixing the problems those bugs describe.
subslots are far from perfect atm
On 27 September 2013 03:10, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
app-text/poppler
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462020
Reading this bug re-fuels my wish for virtuals to un-happen. Maintaining a
virtual with a massive list of || ( ) conditions is so so painful,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
please spend your time on something useful:
fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think better
for fixing the problems those bugs describe.
Those are both an awful lot of work for a very minimal
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:00:01 +1200
Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
( virtual/perl-* is a maintenance nightmare )
virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:53:14 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
please spend your time on something useful:
fix bug #449094 and bug #462138 or propose something you think
better for
On 27 September 2013 06:00, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
ie: every time there is a new iteration of Foo, one must iterate all the
virtuals that relate to it, and vet their need to be updated, and every
single update you do is just something thats easy to get wrong, when it
On 27 September 2013 05:57, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.comwrote:
virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted.
How would you recommend it?
Like for instance, we really do need virtuals ( or equivalent ) for many
things in there, because those things may stop being part of dev-lang/perl
at
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:06:44 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:53:14 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:53:53 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
please spend your time on something useful:
20 matches
Mail list logo
