In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua
Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't
installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, especially
since no part of the system seems to actually require it. It is there if
you need it. I
141005 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074),
Joshua Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems
where PAM isn't installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not,
especially since no part of the system seems to actually require
Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo version.
Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it
breaks. If you can get upstream to just apply that patch, you solve your
problem. Insulting developers as it's happening on that bug will bring you
Am 05. Oct 2014, 15:20 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it
breaks.
Upstream bug is at [1]. According to comment 1 also upstream does not
seem to test non-pam use cases all that often.
I have the
Thanks for looking it up Matthias. Sounds like me or someone else will get
to it asap (not on my laptop right now to commit).
On Oct 5, 2014 4:45 PM, Matthias Maier tamiko+gen...@kyomu.43-1.org
wrote:
Am 05. Oct 2014, 15:20 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu
:
Simple as this:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 14:20:49 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
Insulting developers as it's happening on that bug will bring you
nowhere.
Sadly, the person in question has been on my watch list for a very long
time.
jer
