On 14.03.2015 23:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Trying to explain to a new user that the Portage tree refers to the
collection of ebuilds used by a PMS-compliant package manager (eg
Portage) is problematic.
Full ack. Let's limit portage to the piece of software, please.
Questions: 0. What
On 15.03.2015 10:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
consider moving other repositories there -- at least the
official ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having
everything hosted on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, exp;
should the tree be in one of those namespaces, a new namespace, or be
without a namespace?
On 27 March 2015 at 10:32, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
It would be great to logically separate ebuild repositories (main tree and
overlays) somehow logically from code, data, ...
How about adding an additional level repo for everything that contains
ebuild trees?
On 03/14/2015 18:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo, because it originally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
git://anongit.gentoo.org/portage-tree.git ?
1. afaik everyone is calling it this way already anyway.
2. Since it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:32:41 +0100
Jan Matejka y...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Questions:
0. What names for the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is that ebuild tree that is the core to
what makes it a gentoo system.
I think this is really the heart of your argument and others who feel
gentoo is the best name for the repository.
I'm not going to argue against
On 14 March 2015 at 23:30, Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org wrote:
iirc most deb and rpm based distributions use main for their central
repository, so +1 for gentoo-main.
Add me for gentoo-main too.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 03/15/2015 02:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
The name simply must be 'gentoo'.
Agreed: it should match repo_name.
As for the namespace, proj/ makes most sense of the current namespaces.
I agree with this too, but I don't care if we namespace it or make it
top-level.
On 15-03-2015 11:20:45 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official
ones. Of course, it would be a nice
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Instead of trying to emphasize it's the main repository, we ought to
drop the notion of 'main repository'. That was the goal of all changes
in Portage, so stop trying to regress for the sake of good ol' times.
But, if the
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
As for the namespace, proj/ makes most sense of the current
namespaces.
So on gitweb.gentoo.org our main tree would be listed amongst some
200 other proj repositories, between proj/gentoo-wiki-tyrian.git and
proj/proj/gentoolkit.git.
I think it
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official
ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted
on git.g.o as
On 15 March 2015 at 21:54, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
. In that vain, gentoo-base
could also work?
I like this idea. I was initially toying with gentoo-overlay because it
was more specific than repo but it didn't float well because the model
was wrong.
gentoo-base however kinda
Dnia 2015-03-14, o godz. 22:25:56
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the
gentoo makes a lot of sense to me. gentoo-main works, as well.
Anything with ebuilds doesn't make as much as sense to me, since it
also contains profiles, eclasses, etc. In that vain, gentoo-base
could also work?
I don't really get the need for this whole namespacing thing, so I'd
prefer to do
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
Outside the context of Portage, repo can mean any git repository of any
kind, not merely a portage-usable repository.
Yeah, or an RPM repo, or a Mercurial repo... repo as a term is way
overloaded, so use it with care
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo (it's also the repo_name)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or
potentially confusing...
Definitely, it should be gentoo. Without portage, x86, or any
other
Am Samstag, 14. März 2015, 22:25:56 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 15 March 2015 at 06:34, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
Our repo is already named gentoo, so this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 14.03.2015 23:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Robin H. Johnson
robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
Suggestions: gentoo-repo gentoo-repository gentoo-main
gentoo-repo-main
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
IMO this is the only really accurate name.
(it's also the repo_name)
There you go. It already has the name gentoo. :)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or
potentially confusing...
Yes
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo, because it originally was
only for x86. Here's the very first ebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
proj/gentoo would be fine for me (with the same logic as in the
wiki that Gentoo is the main project)
Personally I would find this a bit confusing so I'd prefer a separate
namespace or no namespace, if going for a separate namespace it might
On 15 March 2015 at 06:34, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
Our repo is already named gentoo, so this makes the most sense.
But I wouldn't mind gentoo-main either. But then we should
Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Calling it gentoo makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes
gentoo.
Exactly. And the repo already has this name set in repo_name.
But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and because ebuilds/
might have other gentoo-official repos too, then perhaps
On 15 March 2015 at 11:37, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Suggestions:
gentoo-repo
gentoo-repository
gentoo-main
gentoo-repo-main
gentoo-repository-main
Similarly in the solve confusion as to purpose for newbies:
gentoo-packages
gentoo-ebuilds
The names would be possibly be
ebuilds/gentoo.git
or
ebuilds/gentoo-main.git
Namespacing things in ebuilds/ might be convenient in the future if we
pursue other types of official ebuild repositories.
Calling it gentoo makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes
gentoo. But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld zx...@gentoo.org wrote:
Calling it gentoo makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes
gentoo. But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and because ebuilds/ might
have other gentoo-official repos too, then perhaps gentoo-main makes more
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
Suggestions:
gentoo-repo
gentoo-repository
gentoo-main
gentoo-repo-main
gentoo-repository-main
1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, exp; should
the
Rich Freeman wrote:
Calling it gentoo makes sense
The thing is, Gentoo is more than a bunch of ebuilds.
Sure, but the gentoo ebuild repo is just a bunch of ebuilds.
Gentoo as name can and should be used elsewhere too of course.
Certainly they're a HUGE part of Gentoo, but they alone
* Andreas K. Huettel schrieb am 14.03.15 um 23:34 Uhr:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
+1
My furst idea, too.
--
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317
3723 296C 6CCA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or potentially
confusing...
1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/14/2015 11:34 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
imho,
Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo (it's also the repo_name)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or
potentially confusing...
1. We have
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
IMO this is the only really accurate name.
I completely agree (with everything else in this email as well).
36 matches
Mail list logo
