On 05/08/2012 02:01 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
There's a server profile which could be the answer.
I've never seen that as being a terribly useful profile. Servers tend
to be very minimal configurations. Maybe if we
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 07:33:59AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
The bottom line is that we don't need 47 different profile targets -
there will always be a use for 1 more. That's why we all run Gentoo
- we aren't bound by the decisions made for us by the package
maintainers.
There's a server
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
There's a server profile which could be the answer.
I've never seen that as being a terribly useful profile. Servers tend
to be very minimal configurations. Maybe if we ever ripped sshd out
of the default profile we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/06/2012 03:04 AM, Ben wrote:
On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay
the same unless we do something to change them. If things change
without us doing the
On Sun, 06 May 2012 10:23:25 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/06/2012 03:04 AM, Ben wrote:
On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay
the
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't think even heavyweight DE/WM usually needs ldap...
Tend to agree. I don't think we want to create a new profile every
time we want to change one of the flags.
Some other questionable ones:
emboss - Adds support for
El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 07:33 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't think even heavyweight DE/WM usually needs ldap...
Tend to agree. I don't think we want to create a new profile every
time we want to change one of
On 05/06/2012 03:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 07:33 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Michał Górnymgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't think even heavyweight DE/WM usually needs ldap...
Tend to agree. I don't think we want to create a new
On Sun, 6 May 2012 07:33:59 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Some other questionable ones:
emboss - Adds support for the European Molecular Biology Open
We've had this discussion before... The question is not are people
likely to want emboss?. The question is of people who use
Hi,
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more users
w/o ldap auth on desktops than with it.
So my proposal is to remove it from
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more users
w/o ldap auth on desktops than
On 05/05/2012 08:10 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsovmaksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are
2012/5/5 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are
On Saturday 05 May 2012 13:10:10 Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/05/2012 06:10 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov
maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi, I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default
On May 5, 2012 3:14 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/05/2012 06:10 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov
maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi, I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote:
On May 5, 2012 3:14 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
mailto:hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/05/2012 06:10 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov
maksbo...@gentoo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/05/2012 09:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Not to mention, you add the possibility that the user may miss the
change since they are not expecting it. I would expect it when I
was changing profiles but not so much just coming out of the blue.
We
2012/5/5 Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/05/2012 09:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Not to mention, you add the possibility that the user may miss the
change since they are not expecting it. I would expect it when I
was changing profiles but not so
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote:
I don't like this change much. There are valid use cases for an ldap use
flag in the desktop profile that could break easily with this change.
There are valid use cases for every USE flag in
Michael Weber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/05/2012 09:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Not to mention, you add the possibility that the user may miss the
change since they are not expecting it. I would expect it when I
was changing profiles but not so much just coming
On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay the
same unless we do something to change them. If things change without us
doing the change, we tend to freak out a bit. We don't need any
freaking out.
Sounds to me like
Ben wrote:
On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay the
same unless we do something to change them. If things change without us
doing the change, we tend to freak out a bit. We don't need any
freaking out.
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 21:20 -0500, Dale wrote:
Ben wrote:
On 6 May 2012 08:29, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned this once a long time ago. We expect things to stay the
same unless we do something to change them. If things change without us
doing the change, we tend to freak
24 matches
Mail list logo
