Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-20 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:07 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Devs should be communicating with maintainers when they touch their packages. That's basically all I said. The rest looks like imagination and flame about elephants and the end of the world while I clearly didn't refer to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote: Is there a communication problem? I don't remember getting either: * a bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote: .. What saddens me the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:30 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: * teams in gentoo are a mess, because they mostly work without much communication and are sort of a badge for people to randomly touch ebuilds they are not familiar with So, this is also something I don't like about our

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Thursday 19 February 2015 10:07:30 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: What saddens me the most is that these pointless threads are becoming sort of a habit not because the reporter is really offended by the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/19/2015 10:31 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: On Thursday 19 February 2015 10:07:30 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: What saddens me the most is that these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand k...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/19/2015 10:31 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: On Thursday 19 February 2015 10:07:30 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: What saddens me

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread hasufell
Patrick Lauer: On Thursday 19 February 2015 00:48:18 hasufell wrote: Patrick Lauer: Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason? Because the python herd doesn't currently maintain the package, nor did they ask me to be co-maintainers. So you put a python package in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-19 Thread hasufell
Rich Freeman: Devs should be communicating with maintainers when they touch their packages. That's basically all I said. The rest looks like imagination and flame about elephants and the end of the world while I clearly didn't refer to any of that. This isn't about protocol, it's about

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-18 Thread hasufell
Is there a communication problem? I don't remember getting either: * a bug report * a ping * a review request Did I miss something? Justin Lecher (jlec): jlec15/02/17 13:39:15 Modified: ChangeLog Added:watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild Log: Version Bump

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 18 Feb 2015 23:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote: Is there a communication problem? I don't remember getting either: * a bug report * a ping * a review request

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote: Is there a communication problem? I don't remember getting either: * a bug report * a ping * a review request Did I miss something? Yes. Why is this package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-18 Thread hasufell
Patrick Lauer: Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason? Because the python herd doesn't currently maintain the package, nor did they ask me to be co-maintainers. Also Why are you pretending to own packages when we're supposed to be working together as a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-18 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote: Is there a communication problem? I don't remember getting either: * a bug report * a ping * a review request Did I miss something? Yes. Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason? Also Why are you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog

2015-02-18 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Thursday 19 February 2015 00:48:18 hasufell wrote: Patrick Lauer: Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason? Because the python herd doesn't currently maintain the package, nor did they ask me to be co-maintainers. So you put a python package in the dev-python