On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Doug Goldstein wrote:
sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage
integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead
of stable for that portion.
--
Doug Goldstein
I
On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Re , William Hubbs said:
All,
This message is an announcement and a reminder.
OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
days.
If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies:
remember
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Re , William Hubbs said:
All,
This message is an announcement and a reminder.
OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
days.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
lost their net configs
So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs
(anybody
* Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org [130816 10:43]:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
lost their net configs
So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
And hence the value of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/08/13 10:57 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org [130816 10:43]:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few
people lost their
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. There are details in
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
handbook as a result.
For regular users, who won't be up to developer standards, maybe the
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
handbook as a result.
For regular users, who won't be up to developer
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
Doug Goldstein wrote:
sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage
integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead
of stable for that portion.
--
Doug Goldstein
I think this is something dispatch-conf does too. I use that but still
make a
11 matches
Mail list logo
