-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
While I tend towards the cleaner design, not the don't fix what isn't
*broken* approach -- I'm fine either way. But I think the handbook or
some tool should obnoxiously spit the flags (and a minor
justification for each flag and/or the set of flags)
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22 January 2013 03:28, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com
wrote:
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Alexander Berntsen
alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
While I tend towards the cleaner design, not the don't fix what isn't
*broken* approach -- I'm fine either way. But I think the handbook or
some tool should obnoxiously spit the flags (and a minor
justification
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/01/13 13:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
As a long-time user, I can't put myself in a first-time user's frame of
reference. But it would be useful for me whenever I'm installing
Gentoo on a new device, if I were able to have the profile's USE-flags
Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:12:06 -0500 as excerpted:
Should we therefore list all the flags on the system and which ones are
enabled and disabled?
I guess we could, but it is a REALLY long list.
In practice I find that the way I tend to use USE flags is that I just
ignore
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote
As a long-time user, I can't put myself in a first-time user's frame
of reference. But it would be useful for me whenever I'm installing
Gentoo on a new device, if I were able to have the profile's USE-flags
listed. (I know I
On 1/21/2013 02:01, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:27:18 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21 January 2013 12:16, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
I don't build server machines every day, others do and it would be
much appreciated
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com wrote:
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
directories have dozens of -flag entries for packages with ridiculous
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:51:54AM -0600, Dustin C. Hatch wrote
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my
/etc/portage/package.use directories have dozens of -flag entries for
packages with ridiculous defaults, and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:28:47PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com
wrote:
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
On 22 January 2013 03:28, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com
wrote:
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
On 22 January 2013 10:36, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
I think we may have to admit that one size does not fit all. There
are just too many individual scenarios. A truly minimal build should be
sufficient to boot to a text console, and have networking and portage to
be able to
On 17/01/2013 19:35, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
my 2ct:
* dri and cups should probably be moved to desktop profile
* pppd is a local useflag and should be enabled by default in the capi ebuild
Definitely agree. Can
13 matches
Mail list logo
