[gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hello guys, just to be sure here Removals are completely up to the maintainer to decide, with expection of QA removal where the package must be already broken to get punted. If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote: If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which also expects you to take care of the bugs (QA can prune it even if you take the maintainership

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/1 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote: If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which also expects you to take care of the bugs (QA can prune

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/02/2013 18:00, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: No, they won't get anyone looking over their shoulder unless they decide to neglect the bugs as few maintainers did. I didn't see a lot forced removals caused by qa, did you? As far as I can tell, they come down to two: - webmin; which was saved