On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:52 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> All, on behalf of the ARM64 project, we are announcing that the ARM64 profiles
> are now stable.
>
Does this mean you're no longer going to break them? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
All, on behalf of the ARM64 project, we are announcing that the ARM64 profiles
are now stable.
Thank you to all who have contributed across the community.
--
Cheers,
Aaron
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi All,
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears that
someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP
things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate.
A) Could the guilty party come forward?
B) If there was something
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears
that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some
WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate.
A) Could
On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears
that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of
On 30 Mar 2015 09:54, Tom Gall wrote:
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears
that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some
WIP
things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate.
just use the web viewer:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but
it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in
profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without bothering to
On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but
it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:37 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears
that someone
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02 Mar 2015 17:14, Tom Gall wrote:
I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space.
See:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall
you should take over uploading to our existing experimental space:
On 02 Mar 2015 17:14, Tom Gall wrote:
I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space. See:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall
you should take over uploading to our existing experimental space:
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/arm64/
should be easy to do ...
and
Thanks for doing that Yixun,
I’ll start on your list a little bit later this evening.
Best,
Tom
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:49 PM, Yixun Lan d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14:27 Wed 18 Feb , Tom Gall wrote:
So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board
is going to
I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space. See:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall
For this week plan to test install stage3 on the HiKey and start to get the
handbook updated in the wiki. We’ll end up with an img that can be dd’ed to sd
media
On 14:27 Wed 18 Feb , Tom Gall wrote:
So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is
going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64
bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of memory
on the board but
On 19/02/15 01:05, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
I have about $1000 in grant money. Want to recommend some equipment?
The dragonboard might be good BUT there are doubts on software availability.
lu
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall tg...@gentoo.org wrote:
So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board
is going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way
64 bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of
So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is
going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64 bit
ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of memory on the
board but it’s not a bad device. I’ve had one for about 2-3
On Feb 18, 2015, at 2:32 PM, C Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall tg...@gentoo.org
mailto:tg...@gentoo.org wrote:
So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is
going to start shipping in March for ~$129.
On 02/18/15 15:32, C Bergström wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall tg...@gentoo.org wrote:
So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board
is going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way
64 bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:06 -0600
Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:43:49 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser.
If I could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:44:20 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
So I don't need shell access any more, at least not in this context.
If you are interested in fixing things feel free to ping me and we
can get you ssh access (assuming that an Opteron 2376 is sufficient)
prior to
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:43:49 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. If I
could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me
understand the issue.
I can give you an accout here; system is Opteron 2000
Thanks!
The issue and fix are clear by now (for details:
http://sourceforge.net/p/uriparser/bugs/24/).
So I don't need shell access any more, at least not in this context.
Best, Sebastian
On 25.01.2015 18:49, Tom Gall wrote:
Least speaking for myself I can help you out starting Feb 15th,
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 14:10 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
On 20:57 Sat 24 Jan , Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been
throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has
all been painfully remote and
On 25/01/15 03:57, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve
been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access
to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less
than optimal for massive key wording
On 01/24/15 21:57, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been
throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all
been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for
massive key wording
On 20:57 Sat 24 Jan , Tom Gall wrote:
Hi All,
This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been
throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all
been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for
massive key
Least speaking for myself I can help you out starting Feb 15th, presuming all
the stars are in alignment. If someone else doesn’t help you before, please
mark it on your calendar and bug me again then cause I’m sure I’ll forget!
Best,
Tom
On Jan 25, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping
Hi!
I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. If I
could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me
understand the issue.
Best,
Sebastian
Hi All,
This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been
throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all
been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for
massive key wording efforts.
That’s about to change.
So if
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:43:24PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:13:16 +0400
Mikle Kolyada zlog...@gentoo.org wrote:
22.04.2014 21:59, Mike Gilbert пишет:
Ok, then the stable keyword is going to get lost when I drop old
versions.
Vapier can restore stable
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:50:03 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The arm64 profiles are marked exp in profiles.desc, so we don't have
to care about the keyword status.
Ah okay; nevermind then, my concern didn't take that into account.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
On 04/23/2014 05:04 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:50:03 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The arm64 profiles are marked exp in profiles.desc, so we don't have
to care about the keyword status.
Ah okay; nevermind then, my concern didn't take that into account.
I
I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of packages.
When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these packages,
is there an arm64 arch team I should copy? If not, these stable
keywords are just going to get lost as old ebuilds get dropped.
For an example,
22.04.2014 21:40, Mike Gilbert пишет:
I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of
packages.
When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these packages,
is there an arm64 arch team I should copy? If not, these stable
keywords are just going to get lost
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Mikle Kolyada zlog...@gentoo.org wrote:
22.04.2014 21:40, Mike Gilbert пишет:
I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of
packages.
When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these packages,
is there an arm64 arch team
22.04.2014 21:59, Mike Gilbert пишет:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Mikle Kolyada zlog...@gentoo.org wrote:
22.04.2014 21:40, Mike Gilbert пишет:
I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of
packages.
When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:13:16 +0400
Mikle Kolyada zlog...@gentoo.org wrote:
22.04.2014 21:59, Mike Gilbert пишет:
Ok, then the stable keyword is going to get lost when I drop old
versions.
Vapier can restore stable keywords for newest version if needed, i
think
Repeating that is a
38 matches
Mail list logo
