I am currently running qmail + fetchmail + procmail + spamassassin. Everything
works pretty well, but I'm a little dissapointed in spamassassin's accuracy.
I'd ideally like something similar to spambayes, which is trainable.
Unfortunately spambayes does not appear to work with maildir. I'd reall
bogofilter might be what you're looking for. I'm using it on my
postfix+mailfilter system, but it should work fine with procmail.
Wes
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Larry Wright wrote:
> I am currently running qmail + fetchmail + procmail + spamassassin. Everything
> works pretty well, but I'm a littl
I've been using bogofilter (http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/) with
procmail with great success. A few false negatives now and then but I
haven't seen a false positive yet. The only thing I don't like about the
setup is that I have to go to a commandline to mark the spam that slipped
through bogof
Try the current spamassassin (2.54).
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin
Looking for bayesian only then bogofilter may be a better choice (I prefer
spamassassin on the server & popfile on the client).
emerge net-mail/bogofilter
Paul
At 08:31 AM 06/05/2003 -0500, you wrote:
* On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:31:48 -0500, Larry Wright wrote:
> I am currently running qmail + fetchmail + procmail + spamassassin. Everything
> works pretty well, but I'm a little dissapointed in spamassassin's accuracy.
> I'd ideally like something similar to spambayes, which is trainable.
>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:31:48AM -0500 or thereabouts, Larry Wright wrote:
> I am currently running qmail + fetchmail + procmail + spamassassin. Everything
> works pretty well, but I'm a little dissapointed in spamassassin's accuracy.
As Jens said, the latest version of SpamAssassin supports b
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 09:40, Ryan wrote:
> I've been using bogofilter (http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/) with
> procmail with great success. A few false negatives now and then but I
> haven't seen a false positive yet. The only thing I don't like about the
> setup is that I have to go to a comma
On 2003.06.05 09:31, Larry Wright wrote:
I am currently running qmail + fetchmail + procmail + spamassassin.
Everything
works pretty well, but I'm a little dissapointed in spamassassin's
accuracy.
I'd ideally like something similar to spambayes, which is trainable.
Unfortunately spambayes does not
If you are using qmail, consdier qconfirm: It requires you to expose
your qmail to the net but as long as you have an always on connection,
it is easy to do with dyndns.org. It virtual elminates SPAM, because
only those that have explicitly responded to a confirmation request, or
you have explic
On 2003-06-05 20:45, Anthony Ventimiglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I mean by buckets, Popfile lets you have as many as you want,
> which I like so I can sort normal mail, work related, mailing lists, spam,
> etc.. as many categories as I want.
Well, you were right about bogofilte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 June 2003 01:09 am, Luke Ravitch wrote:
> On 2003-06-05 20:45, Anthony Ventimiglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's what I mean by buckets, Popfile lets you have as many as you want,
> > which I like so I can sort normal mail, work re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 June 2003 09:31 am, Larry Wright wrote:
> I am currently running qmail + fetchmail + procmail + spamassassin.
> Everything works pretty well, but I'm a little dissapointed in
> spamassassin's accuracy. I'd ideally like something similar
On 2003-06-05 07:15, Anthony Ventimiglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bogofilter should be more *nixy since it was written by esr, but I
> don't know if it supports more than two buckets.
Not sure what you mean by buckets. Bogofilter doesn't really care how
many mailboxes you use. It operates on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 June 2003 09:43 pm, Luke Ravitch wrote:
> On 2003-06-05 07:15, Anthony Ventimiglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you mean classification buckets, Bogofilter can be set to classify
> mail as spam, not spam (ham), and not sure. That's
14 matches
Mail list logo
