[gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-02 Thread Tom Eastman
At the moment, my kernel is a somewhat random mix of things that are compiled directly in, compiled as modules, or compiled as external modules (like nvidia). I'm about to go from gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.9-r9 to 2.6.10, but I was wondering just what would happen if I simply went through my kernel c

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-02 Thread Nick Rout
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:12:29 +1300 Tom Eastman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the moment, my kernel is a somewhat random mix of things that are > compiled directly in, compiled as modules, or compiled as external modules > (like nvidia). > > I'm about to go from gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.9-r9 to 2

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-02 Thread Karsten Baumgarten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Eastman wrote: | I'm about to go from gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.9-r9 to 2.6.10, but I was | wondering just what would happen if I simply went through my kernel config | and compiled absolutely *everything* that can be a module, as a module. | | In my h

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-02 Thread afabian
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:12:29PM +1300, Tom Eastman wrote: > What do people think? Does it seem like a good idea? Or is it just > immensely stupid? > > Tom Modules are handy, but the way I figure it, things like modules and initrd's are a pain to do by hand, and mostly exist to meet the nee

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-02 Thread Nicolas Bailey
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:34:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:12:29PM +1300, Tom Eastman wrote: > > > What do people think? Does it seem like a good idea? Or is it just > > immensely stupid? > > > > Tom > > Modules are handy, but the way I figure

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 22:34:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modules are handy, but the way I figure it, things like modules and > initrd's are a pain to do by hand, and mostly exist to meet the needs of > generic distributions and LiveCD's and the like. If you don't blow away > your source tree

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling *everything* as a kernel module.

2005-02-03 Thread Douglas James Dunn
comparing the number of new kernels I use compared to how often I upgrade hardware. For me I dont unload kernel modules. the only modules I have are sound and video. I think you have to load them as modules. Anyways depending on how often you upgrade your kernel and if you actually need to modu