On Wednesday 09 February 2005 04:45 am, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
If you emerge a program and it fails.. and you then re-emerge it, is
there a way to tell emerge to continue compiling from where it left
off using the .o files that are already compiled?
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
If you emerge a program and it fails.. and you then re-emerge it, is
there a way to tell emerge to continue compiling from where it left off
using the .o files that are already compiled?
OpenOffice has failed on me twice now.. and on a PIII laptop starting at
Square 1 ,
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 11:25, Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
OpenOffice has failed on me twice now.. and on a PIII laptop starting
at Square 1 , again and again is consuming a lot of time!
You should really consider openoffice-bin. OOo is a behemoth package
that takes six hours to compile on my
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
* Holly Bostick wrote:
Actually, emerge does compile from where it left off in some respect; it
does start the process from the beginning, but if the section is found
to already be compiled, it is not recompiled; Portage just goes on to
the next part.
Compiling OO.o just
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 11:25 schrieb ext Shaun Lipscombe:
If you emerge a program and it fails.. and you then re-emerge it, is
there a way to tell emerge to continue compiling from where it left off
using the .o files that are already compiled?
ebuild /path/to/ebuild compile
ebuild
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:43:10 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
ebuild /path/to/ebuild compile
ebuild /path/to/ebuild install
ebuild /path/to/ebuild qmerge
ebuild /path/to/ebuild merge
will do it.
--
Neil Bothwick
(A)bort (R)etry (S)ell it
pgpLDsu056bz7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 11:25 schrieb ext Shaun Lipscombe:
If you emerge a program and it fails.. and you then re-emerge it, is
there a way to tell emerge to continue compiling from where it left off
using the .o files that are already compiled?
ebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
| * Holly Bostick wrote:
|
|
|Actually, emerge does compile from where it left off in some respect; it
|does start the process from the beginning, but if the section is found
|to already be compiled, it is not recompiled; Portage
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:01:26 +0100, Karsten Baumgarten wrote:
Not so weird after all. You are running out of memory while compiling
openoffice.org. The kernel tries to free up some memory and thus is
happy to kill everything he thinks is not necessary (including GNOME, X,
...) to keep the
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 12:49 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:43:10 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
ebuild /path/to/ebuild compile
ebuild /path/to/ebuild install
ebuild /path/to/ebuild qmerge
ebuild /path/to/ebuild merge
will do it.
You're right, I misunderstood the
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 12:50 schrieb ext Bastian Balthazar Bux:
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
ebuild /path/to/ebuild compile
maybe I'm remembering wrong but compile before to start issue the
equivalent of a make clean
If it's wrong please post, it's usefull to know.
Yes, it is. It starts
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 12:50 schrieb ext Bastian Balthazar Bux:
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
ebuild /path/to/ebuild compile
maybe I'm remembering wrong but compile before to start issue the
equivalent of a make clean
If it's wrong please post, it's
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:01:25 +, Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
Either start the emerge from a virtual console or a screen session.
That way the terminal won't be closed when the WM shots down and the
compile will continue.
Well I decided to use ssh, since even if it disconnects me I'll at
Quoting Leif B. Kristensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You should really consider openoffice-bin. OOo is a behemoth package
that takes six hours to compile on my 3.0 GHz P-4. I flushed it after
the third recompile and emerged openoffice-bin instead. Except for the
install time, I can't notice any
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 15:26, Mark Brier wrote:
I beg to differ, compiled Ooo runs much faster than the binary
version. It's a long compile, but worth it IMO. Took about 6 hours on
my athlon-xp 2000 with half a gig of ram (ximian version).
I'm using plain text editors for all my
Anyway.. I have a 512MB swap partition, I was running top and I wasn't
even using that much swap.. I have 256MB RAM in the laptop..
Does that still seem like I'm running out?
Yes. There is too little combined memory. Things like gcc, glibc, and
firefox have peak memory requirements of
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Bob Sanders wrote:
Anyway.. I have a 512MB swap partition, I was running top and I wasn't
even using that much swap.. I have 256MB RAM in the laptop..
Does that still seem like I'm running out?
Yes. There is too little combined memory. Things like gcc, glibc,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
|
| Anyway.. I have a 512MB swap partition, I was running top and I wasn't
| even using that much swap.. I have 256MB RAM in the laptop..
|
| Does that still seem like I'm running out?
|
You should try your emerge of OO without a
I have a system with 128mb + 256mb of swap. It has been enough to compile
everything including OOo. I've seen (very rarely) the swap usage to go
up to about 150-200mb, but it has never run out of memory yet.
The reason for this may be that I don't use gnome or kde on that computer
and I
You should try your emerge of OO without a desktop running. This
will reduce the the amount of memory that is used by the desktop.
If you use gdm:
rc-update del gdm default
replace gdm with whatever desktop manager you are using then reboot
and you should have a text login. Login
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Bob Sanders wrote:
Sorry, just reporting what I've observed on an amd64 system while running
Enlightenment, with a 1280x1024 jpeg background, 2 Eterms and 1 top.
If so, how come I've been able to compile all this stuff on my box...?
It also depends on whether c++ and
21 matches
Mail list logo
