On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 18:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:35:06 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
> > Yes. Current stable version is 2.5.7-r5, and 2.5.7-r2 does not exist in
> > the main Portage tree any more (though you can get it from the attic).
>
> You can also get it from /var/
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:35:06 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Yes. Current stable version is 2.5.7-r5, and 2.5.7-r2 does not exist in
> the main Portage tree any more (though you can get it from the attic).
You can also get it from /var/db/pkg/cat-egory/package/. Copy it to your
portage overlay, yo
Holly Bostick wrote:
Not to reply to myself, but I might be a bit off:
Hmm... Is the reason for the upgrade/downgrade because there's no more
2.5.7-r2 in the ebuilds??
Yes. Current stable version is 2.5.7-r5, and 2.5.7-r2 does not exist in
the main Portage tree any more (though you can get it fro
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 18:36, Heinz Sporn wrote:
Hi!
Lots of confusion out there ;-)
Question: when did you perform your last emerge sync?
2 days ago.
squid-2.4.7.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha mips hppa"
squid-2.5.5-r3.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha hppa ~ia64 s390
am
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 19:39, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:30:28 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> >>
> >>>Using -> www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> >>>--- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.mask: www-proxy/squid-2.5
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 18:36, Heinz Sporn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Lots of confusion out there ;-)
>
> Question: when did you perform your last emerge sync?
2 days ago.
squid-2.4.7.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha mips hppa"
squid-2.5.5-r3.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha hppa ~ia64 s390
amd64 p
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 16:18, Nicolas Bailey wrote:
> > Putting :
> > >www-proxy/squid-2.5.7
> > [ebuild UD] www-proxy/squid-2.5.6-r3 [2.5.7-r2]
> >
> > It wants to Downgrade to 2.5.6
> >
> > using
> > >=www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> > [ebuild UD] www-proxy/squid-2.5.6-r3 [2.5.7-r2]
> >
> >
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 16:36, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:06:18 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
>
> > > Read the previous replies again. you already have 2.5.7-r2 s you don't
> > > want to mask that, you want to mask everything greater than it. The
> > > line is package.mask should be "
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:30:28 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Using -> www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
--- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.mask: www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating depe
On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:06 am, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:30:28 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > > Using -> www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> > > --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.mask:
> > > www-proxy/
Hi!
Lots of confusion out there ;-)
Question: when did you perform your last emerge sync?
The reason I am asking: as of today Squid Version v2.5.7-r5 will be
found both in the stable and in the unstable (~x86) branch.
Since you're having trouble with v2.5.7-r4 it might well be that you
suffer f
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:06:18 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > Read the previous replies again. you already have 2.5.7-r2 s you don't
> > want to mask that, you want to mask everything greater than it. The
> > line is package.mask should be ">www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2". Putting an
> > = after the > as
> Putting :
> >www-proxy/squid-2.5.7
> [ebuild UD] www-proxy/squid-2.5.6-r3 [2.5.7-r2]
>
> It wants to Downgrade to 2.5.6
>
> using
> >=www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> [ebuild UD] www-proxy/squid-2.5.6-r3 [2.5.7-r2]
>
> It _still_ wants to downgrade..
I don't understand the confusion. There
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:30:28 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
>
> > Using -> www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> > --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.mask: www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >
> > Calc
Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 18:30 +0800, Ow Mun Heng a écrit :
> Using -> www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.mask: www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
you probably typed > www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2 , and not
>www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2 (no space between > and www-proxy...)
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:30:28 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> Using -> www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.mask: www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild U ] www-proxy/squid-2
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:20, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 03:01 am, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I read about using package.mask and thus I placed
> >
> > >=www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
> >
> > Doing that and doing an emerge -uDpv world, I see that inst
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 03:01 am, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I read about using package.mask and thus I placed
>
> >=www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
>
> Doing that and doing an emerge -uDpv world, I see that instead of
> wanting to upgrade, it now wants to downgrade it.
>
> How do I t
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:01:06 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> I read about using package.mask and thus I placed
>
> >=www-proxy/squid-2.5.7-r2
>
> Doing that and doing an emerge -uDpv world, I see that instead of
> wanting to upgrade, it now wants to downgrade it.
If you currently have 2.5.7-r2 you
I have a dilemma. and I don;t know gentoo well enough to solve it on my
own.
I don't want to perform compiles _every_ single day/week to catch up
with x86. Doing emerge -uDv world is great at first but gets a bit
tiring in the end as one has to fix/figure out what bombed (if any.)
There are also
20 matches
Mail list logo
